• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Procalcitonin kinetics following abdominal aortic surgery and its value for postoperative intestinal ischaemia detection

T. Novotny, R. Staffa, J. Tomandl, T. Krivka, P. Kruzliak, M. Tomandlova, O. Slaby, J. Sponiar, M. Caprnda, L. Gaspar, L. Rodrigo, I. Mozos, L. Kubicek, E. Biros, R. Vlachovsky, L. Radova, A. Konieczna

. 2023 ; 31 (6) : 1061-1068. [pub] 20220520

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000569

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to describe perioperative kinetics of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients undergoing aortic surgery, to compare the kinetics in the open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), and to evaluate the ability of PCT to detect intestinal ischaemia. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized observational cohort study in 80 patients (62 men and 18 women) undergoing elective aortic surgery was performed. Serum PCT was measured at baseline and defined intraoperative and postoperative timepoints up to postoperative day 7. MRI contrast-enhanced imaging was used to detect intestinal ischaemia. RESULTS: The comparison of the AAA and AIOD cohort did not show any significant difference in PCT levels. Patients with intestinal ischaemia had higher serum PCT at multiple timepoints postoperatively. The most accurate timepoints for early diagnosis were postoperative day 3, followed by 24 h after declamping of the vascular reconstruction, and postoperative day 7. The sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100% in all mentioned timepoints. However, event at the best timepoint the specificity was 89% and the positive predictive value 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin levels in the postoperative period at proper timepoints might help to detect postoperative intestinal ischaemia. The limitation of this marker is its low specificity for intestinal ischaemia and low positive predictive value. The highest value of this marker is that it can rule out this complication because normal PCT levels mean that intestinal ischaemia is very unlikely.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000569
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093251.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/17085381221102812 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35594244
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Novotny, Tomas $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Procalcitonin kinetics following abdominal aortic surgery and its value for postoperative intestinal ischaemia detection / $c T. Novotny, R. Staffa, J. Tomandl, T. Krivka, P. Kruzliak, M. Tomandlova, O. Slaby, J. Sponiar, M. Caprnda, L. Gaspar, L. Rodrigo, I. Mozos, L. Kubicek, E. Biros, R. Vlachovsky, L. Radova, A. Konieczna
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to describe perioperative kinetics of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients undergoing aortic surgery, to compare the kinetics in the open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), and to evaluate the ability of PCT to detect intestinal ischaemia. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized observational cohort study in 80 patients (62 men and 18 women) undergoing elective aortic surgery was performed. Serum PCT was measured at baseline and defined intraoperative and postoperative timepoints up to postoperative day 7. MRI contrast-enhanced imaging was used to detect intestinal ischaemia. RESULTS: The comparison of the AAA and AIOD cohort did not show any significant difference in PCT levels. Patients with intestinal ischaemia had higher serum PCT at multiple timepoints postoperatively. The most accurate timepoints for early diagnosis were postoperative day 3, followed by 24 h after declamping of the vascular reconstruction, and postoperative day 7. The sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100% in all mentioned timepoints. However, event at the best timepoint the specificity was 89% and the positive predictive value 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin levels in the postoperative period at proper timepoints might help to detect postoperative intestinal ischaemia. The limitation of this marker is its low specificity for intestinal ischaemia and low positive predictive value. The highest value of this marker is that it can rule out this complication because normal PCT levels mean that intestinal ischaemia is very unlikely.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a prokalcitonin $7 D000077740
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a břicho $7 D000005
650    12
$a ateroskleróza $7 D050197
650    12
$a Lericheův syndrom $7 D007925
650    12
$a mezenteriální ischemie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D065666
650    _2
$a pooperační období $7 D011184
650    _2
$a ischemie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D007511
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Staffa, Robert $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tomandl, Josef $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Krivka, Tomas $u Department of Medical Imaging, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kruzliak, Peter $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000290101766
700    1_
$a Tomandlova, Marie $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Slaby, Ondrej $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sponiar, Jan $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Caprnda, Martin $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Gaspar, Ludovit $u Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Trnava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Rodrigo, Luis $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo and Central University Hospital of Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
700    1_
$a Mozos, Ioana $u Department of Functional Sciences, Discipline of Pathophysiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania $u Center for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
700    1_
$a Kubicek, Lubos $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Biros, Ernest $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vlachovsky, Robert $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Radova, Lenka $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Konieczna, Anna $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00007624 $t Vascular $x 1708-539X $g Roč. 31, č. 6 (2023), s. 1061-1068
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35594244 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093248 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049310 $s 1210263
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 31 $c 6 $d 1061-1068 $e 20220520 $i 1708-539X $m Vascular $n Vasc $x MED00007624
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace