-
Something wrong with this record ?
Does the application of autologous injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) affect the patient's daily performance during the retraction of upper canines? A single-centre randomized split-mouth controlled trial
T. Zeitounlouian, R. Haddad, B. Brad, MA. Ballouk, P. Fudalej
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Tooth Extraction methods MeSH
- Platelet-Rich Fibrin * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pain, Postoperative MeSH
- Dental Care MeSH
- Mouth MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have assessed different aspects concerning the applications of i-PRF in the oral cavity. However, nothing is known regarding patients' perceptions of the injection of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). OBJECTIVES: To investigate patients' perceptions after injecting platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the course of retracting upper canines. METHODS: Twenty-one patients, whose treatments required extractions of both upper first premolars, were recruited. Extraction side was randomly allocated to the intervention or control sides. After the alignment phase, i-PRF was injected twice with a one-month interval on the buccal and palatal aspects of the extraction sites (intervention side). Patients' perceptions were evaluated with two questionnaires: the first was used to assess the level of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating and swallowing difficulties as well as jaw movement restriction after 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 6 h (T3), 24 h (T4) and 48 h (T5) of the second injection; the second questionnaire was used to assess the acceptance of the i-PRF injection and overall satisfaction with this technique at the end of canine retraction phase. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was adopted for this purpose. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare between both sides at all time points while Friedman's Test was the selected test for detecting variables' changes over time. Post-hoc Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Tests were applied when any of the results were significant. As to the multiplicity of tests, Bonferroni Correction was implemented. RESULTS: Pain and swelling levels were significantly higher on the experimental compared to the control sides at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05), whereas they declined sharply and went back to almost normal values at T4 (after 24 h). At T5 they were 0. Discomfort and difficulty in mastication on intervention sides were significant only at T1 and T2. Pain, swelling, and chewing difficulties were significant (P < 0.001) during the 4 assessed time points. The increase was insignificant regarding swallowing difficulties and jaw movement limitations at all time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting autologous (i-PRF) during orthodontic canine retraction is a well-perceived and well-tolerated method due to the limited discomfort which significantly diminishes 24 h afterwards. TRIAL'S REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier Number: NCT03399422. 16/01/2018).
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry Damascus University Damascus Syria
Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Damascus University Damascus Syria
Department of Paediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry Damascus University Damascus Syria
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000655
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093314.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12903-023-03646-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37978474
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Zeitounlouian, Talar $u Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria. talarzeitounian@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000224880968
- 245 10
- $a Does the application of autologous injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) affect the patient's daily performance during the retraction of upper canines? A single-centre randomized split-mouth controlled trial / $c T. Zeitounlouian, R. Haddad, B. Brad, MA. Ballouk, P. Fudalej
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Previous studies have assessed different aspects concerning the applications of i-PRF in the oral cavity. However, nothing is known regarding patients' perceptions of the injection of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). OBJECTIVES: To investigate patients' perceptions after injecting platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the course of retracting upper canines. METHODS: Twenty-one patients, whose treatments required extractions of both upper first premolars, were recruited. Extraction side was randomly allocated to the intervention or control sides. After the alignment phase, i-PRF was injected twice with a one-month interval on the buccal and palatal aspects of the extraction sites (intervention side). Patients' perceptions were evaluated with two questionnaires: the first was used to assess the level of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating and swallowing difficulties as well as jaw movement restriction after 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 6 h (T3), 24 h (T4) and 48 h (T5) of the second injection; the second questionnaire was used to assess the acceptance of the i-PRF injection and overall satisfaction with this technique at the end of canine retraction phase. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was adopted for this purpose. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare between both sides at all time points while Friedman's Test was the selected test for detecting variables' changes over time. Post-hoc Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Tests were applied when any of the results were significant. As to the multiplicity of tests, Bonferroni Correction was implemented. RESULTS: Pain and swelling levels were significantly higher on the experimental compared to the control sides at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05), whereas they declined sharply and went back to almost normal values at T4 (after 24 h). At T5 they were 0. Discomfort and difficulty in mastication on intervention sides were significant only at T1 and T2. Pain, swelling, and chewing difficulties were significant (P < 0.001) during the 4 assessed time points. The increase was insignificant regarding swallowing difficulties and jaw movement limitations at all time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting autologous (i-PRF) during orthodontic canine retraction is a well-perceived and well-tolerated method due to the limited discomfort which significantly diminishes 24 h afterwards. TRIAL'S REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier Number: NCT03399422. 16/01/2018).
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fibrin bohatý na krevní destičky $7 D000073183
- 650 _2
- $a ústa $7 D009055
- 650 _2
- $a extrakce zubů $x metody $7 D014081
- 650 _2
- $a stomatologická péče $7 D003729
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační bolest $7 D010149
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Haddad, Rania $u Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
- 700 1_
- $a Brad, Bassel $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
- 700 1_
- $a Ballouk, Muhammed Al-Huda $u Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000349610611
- 700 1_
- $a Fudalej, Piotr $u Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, Medical Faculty, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland $u Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187777434
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006812 $t BMC oral health $x 1472-6831 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2023), s. 872
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37978474 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093311 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049351 $s 1210349
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 23 $c 1 $d 872 $e 20231117 $i 1472-6831 $m BMC oral health $n BMC Oral Health $x MED00006812
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109