Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

How reliable is the application of the sex classifier based on exocranial surface (Musilová et al., 2016) for geographically and temporally distant skull series

T. Meinerová, D. Šutoová, P. Brukner Havelková, J. Velemínská, J. Dupej, Š. Bejdová

. 2023 ; 352 (-) : 111850. [pub] 20231002

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago

Sex estimation is one of the crucial trends in cases of findings of unknown skeletal remains in forensics and bioarchaeology. The changing nature of sexual dimorphism (population specificity, secular trend, other external and internal factors influence) brings challenges to developing new methods; and there are new aims to be independent of these changes such, as the method by Musilová et al. (2016). These methods need to be evaluated on different datasets to determine if they are truly reliable among populations from different places and times, in the case of bioarchaeology. This study assessed the application of the aforementioned method on non-European contemporary and ancient populations to identify the reliability of the method on this separate dataset. The study sample consisted of 96 CT scans of skulls from contemporary Egyptians and 54 3D models of skulls from the Egyptian Old Kingdom Period (2700-2180 BC). The classifier method, previously tested on both Czech and French populations, yielded high accuracies (over 90 %) for sex estimation. For the contemporary Egyptian skull sample, the classifier was able to determine males versus females with an 89.59 % accuracy rate and an AUC value (area under the curve - a measure of the combined specificity and sensitivity of the test) of 0.99; this proves that the classifier is reliable even with a lower degree of accuracy. Conversely, the Old Kingdom Period sample yielded a lower level of accuracy at around 70 % (61.11 %, precisely), although with an AUC value of 0.92, the result is not considered reliable.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000808
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093402.0
007      
ta
008      
240109e20231002ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111850 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37827023
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Meinerová, Tereza $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic. Electronic address: meinerot@natur.cuni.cz
245    10
$a How reliable is the application of the sex classifier based on exocranial surface (Musilová et al., 2016) for geographically and temporally distant skull series / $c T. Meinerová, D. Šutoová, P. Brukner Havelková, J. Velemínská, J. Dupej, Š. Bejdová
520    9_
$a Sex estimation is one of the crucial trends in cases of findings of unknown skeletal remains in forensics and bioarchaeology. The changing nature of sexual dimorphism (population specificity, secular trend, other external and internal factors influence) brings challenges to developing new methods; and there are new aims to be independent of these changes such, as the method by Musilová et al. (2016). These methods need to be evaluated on different datasets to determine if they are truly reliable among populations from different places and times, in the case of bioarchaeology. This study assessed the application of the aforementioned method on non-European contemporary and ancient populations to identify the reliability of the method on this separate dataset. The study sample consisted of 96 CT scans of skulls from contemporary Egyptians and 54 3D models of skulls from the Egyptian Old Kingdom Period (2700-2180 BC). The classifier method, previously tested on both Czech and French populations, yielded high accuracies (over 90 %) for sex estimation. For the contemporary Egyptian skull sample, the classifier was able to determine males versus females with an 89.59 % accuracy rate and an AUC value (area under the curve - a measure of the combined specificity and sensitivity of the test) of 0.99; this proves that the classifier is reliable even with a lower degree of accuracy. Conversely, the Old Kingdom Period sample yielded a lower level of accuracy at around 70 % (61.11 %, precisely), although with an AUC value of 0.92, the result is not considered reliable.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a soudní antropologie $x metody $7 D018732
650    12
$a určení pohlaví podle kostry $x metody $7 D054881
650    _2
$a lebka $x diagnostické zobrazování $x anatomie a histologie $7 D012886
650    _2
$a hlava $7 D006257
650    _2
$a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Šutoová, Denisa $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Brukner Havelková, Petra $u Department of Anthropology, Natural History Museum, National Museum in Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Velemínská, Jana $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dupej, Ján $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bejdová, Šárka $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001844 $t Forensic science international $x 1872-6283 $g Roč. 352 (20231002), s. 111850
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37827023 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093359 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049427 $s 1210502
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 352 $c - $d 111850 $e 20231002 $i 1872-6283 $m Forensic science international $n Forensic Sci Int $x MED00001844
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...