Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sensory and locomotor responses following CrossFit, Les Mills and traditional resistance trainings in sedentary subjects

Habil Hamdouni, Brian Kliszczewicz, Wissem Dhahbi, Fatma Z. Ben Salah, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman

. 2023 ; 53 (1) : 1-10. [pub] 20231024

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu klinická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24002329

Background: There is a paucity of literature on the effects of fitness programs such as CrossFit (CF), Les Mills (LM), and traditional resistance training (TRAD) on sensorimotor responses, which define overall motor skills levels that are major factors in improving quality of life of fitness training practitioners. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the sensorimotor responses after 16 weeks of CF, LM and TRAD trainings. Methods: A total of one hundred and seven sedentary participants (81 men, 26 women, age 30.5 ± 5.7 years, weight 78.9 ± 11.1 kg, height 174.9 cm, fat mass 25.4 ± 5.3%) were assigned randomly into 3 groups CF (n = 34), LM (n = 33) and TRAD (n = 40), they followed the training allocated at the rate of 5 sessions/week for 16 weeks. On three occasions: before (T0), after eight (T1) and sixteen weeks (T2) of training, participants underwent different tests of sensorimotor measures; coordination (Extremity Motor Coordination Test), accuracy (Motor Accuracy Test), agility (Illinois Agility Test) and balance (Y Balance Test).Results: Coordination improved only in the LM group for upper (T0-T1: p < .001, d = 0.09-0.13; T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.16-0.18) and lower limbs coordination (T0-T1: p < .001, d = 0.16-0.25; T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.24-0.26). Agility test showed improvements for LM (T0-T1: p < .001, d = 0.55; T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.87) and CF (T0-T1: p = .002, d = 0.20; T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.40) and no difference for TRAD. For balance, results showed improvements in lower limbs for CF (T0-T1: p < .001, d = 0.08-0.14, T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.05-0.23) and TRAD (T0-T1: p ≤ .003, d = 0.05-0.08, T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.08-0.13) and at T2 for LM (p = 0.04, d = 0.06-0.2), for the upper limbs, results showed improvements for CF (T0-T1: p < .001, d = 0.04-0.09; T1-T2: p < .001, d = 0.15-0.28), at T2 for TRAD (p = .01-.03, d = 0.03-0.10) and no difference for LM. For motor accuracy, results did not show any difference. Conclusions: CF and LM trainings helps develop agility; however, CF and TRAD are more oriented to balance while LM are to coordination improvement, all three trainings have no effect on motor accuracy.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24002329
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240322180254.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
240206s2023 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/ag.2023.012 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Hamdouni, Habil $u Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" (LR09SEP01), National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia $u Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said; Tunis, Tunisia
245    10
$a Sensory and locomotor responses following CrossFit, Les Mills and traditional resistance trainings in sedentary subjects / $c Habil Hamdouni, Brian Kliszczewicz, Wissem Dhahbi, Fatma Z. Ben Salah, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman
520    9_
$a Background: There is a paucity of literature on the effects of fitness programs such as CrossFit (CF), Les Mills (LM), and traditional resistance training (TRAD) on sensorimotor responses, which define overall motor skills levels that are major factors in improving quality of life of fitness training practitioners. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the sensorimotor responses after 16 weeks of CF, LM and TRAD trainings. Methods: A total of one hundred and seven sedentary participants (81 men, 26 women, age 30.5 ± 5.7 years, weight 78.9 ± 11.1 kg, height 174.9 cm, fat mass 25.4 ± 5.3%) were assigned randomly into 3 groups CF (n = 34), LM (n = 33) and TRAD (n = 40), they followed the training allocated at the rate of 5 sessions/week for 16 weeks. On three occasions: before (T0), after eight (T1) and sixteen weeks (T2) of training, participants underwent different tests of sensorimotor measures; coordination (Extremity Motor Coordination Test), accuracy (Motor Accuracy Test), agility (Illinois Agility Test) and balance (Y Balance Test).Results: Coordination improved only in the LM group for upper (T0-T1: p &lt; .001, d = 0.09-0.13; T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.16-0.18) and lower limbs coordination (T0-T1: p &lt; .001, d = 0.16-0.25; T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.24-0.26). Agility test showed improvements for LM (T0-T1: p &lt; .001, d = 0.55; T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.87) and CF (T0-T1: p = .002, d = 0.20; T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.40) and no difference for TRAD. For balance, results showed improvements in lower limbs for CF (T0-T1: p &lt; .001, d = 0.08-0.14, T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.05-0.23) and TRAD (T0-T1: p ≤ .003, d = 0.05-0.08, T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.08-0.13) and at T2 for LM (p = 0.04, d = 0.06-0.2), for the upper limbs, results showed improvements for CF (T0-T1: p &lt; .001, d = 0.04-0.09; T1-T2: p &lt; .001, d = 0.15-0.28), at T2 for TRAD (p = .01-.03, d = 0.03-0.10) and no difference for LM. For motor accuracy, results did not show any difference. Conclusions: CF and LM trainings helps develop agility; however, CF and TRAD are more oriented to balance while LM are to coordination improvement, all three trainings have no effect on motor accuracy.
650    17
$a sedavý životní styl $7 D057185 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a odporový trénink $x klasifikace $x metody $7 D055070 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a motorické dovednosti $7 D009048 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a cvičení $x fyziologie $x klasifikace $7 D015444 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a senzorická zpětná vazba $7 D056228 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a dospělí $7 D000328 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260 $2 czmesh
655    _7
$a klinická studie $7 D000068397 $2 czmesh
700    1_
$a Kliszczewicz, Brian $u Department of Exercise Science and Sports Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA
700    1_
$a Dhahbi, Wissem $u Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" (LR09SEP01), National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia $u Training Department, Qatar Police College, Doha, Qatar
700    1_
$a Ben Salah, Fatma Z. $u Department of Medicine Physical and Functional Rehabilitation, National Institute of Orthopedics "M. T. Kassab", Tunis, Tunisia
700    1_
$a Ben Abderrahman, Abderraouf $u Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said; Tunis, Tunisia
773    0_
$t Acta Gymnica $x 2336-4912 $g Roč. 53, č. 1 (2023), s. 1-10 $w MED00190456
856    41
$u https://gymnica.upol.cz/artkey/gym-202301-0012_sensory_and_locomotor_responses_following_crossfit_les_mills_and_traditional_resistance_trainings_in_sedentary.php $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20240206 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240322180247 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2054547 $s 1212044
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 53 $c 1 $d 1-10 $e 20231024 $i 2336-4912 $m Acta Gymnica $x MED00190456
LZP    __
$c NLK193 $d 20240320 $b NLK111 $a Actavia-MED00190456-20240206

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace