-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty Using BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AT. Wang, AC. Panayi, S. Fischer, YF. Diehm, C. Tapking, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, M. Mastroianni, B. Pomahac, V. Haug
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články
PubMed
36411260
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjac293
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamoplastika * psychologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module is an established tool for outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess key parameters affecting pre- and postoperative scores, with specific foci on patient characteristics and tissue resection weights. METHODS: This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED (National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD), Google Scholar (Google; Mountain View, CA), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics; Philadelphia, PA) were searched. All studies published before August 1, 2021, were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were prospective or retrospective studies in 6 languages that reported quality of life after reduction mammoplasty employing the BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module. Quality of included studies was assessed employing the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Analysis was performed per Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 28 papers were included in the systematic review, 13 for preoperative meta-analysis, and 17 for postoperative meta-analysis. Postoperative scores in all 3 quality of life domains (psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being) and satisfaction with breasts increased significantly after reduction mammoplasty compared with preoperative scores. Satisfaction with breasts showed the greatest improvement, from 22.9 to 73.0. Preoperative scores were lower than normative data, with improvement to comparable scores as the healthy population postoperatively. Improvements in BREAST-Q scores did not correlate with patient comorbidities, complication rates, or amount of breast tissue resected. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammoplasty provides marked improvement in BREAST-Q patient-reported quality of life as well established in literature. However, these improvements do not correlate with tissue resection weights, warranting further inquiry of insurance-defined resection requirements.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24003202
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240509113218.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240220s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/asj/sjac293 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36411260
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Wang, Alice T $1 https://orcid.org/0000000150358201
- 245 10
- $a Patient-Reported Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty Using BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c AT. Wang, AC. Panayi, S. Fischer, YF. Diehm, C. Tapking, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, M. Mastroianni, B. Pomahac, V. Haug
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module is an established tool for outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess key parameters affecting pre- and postoperative scores, with specific foci on patient characteristics and tissue resection weights. METHODS: This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED (National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD), Google Scholar (Google; Mountain View, CA), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics; Philadelphia, PA) were searched. All studies published before August 1, 2021, were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were prospective or retrospective studies in 6 languages that reported quality of life after reduction mammoplasty employing the BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module. Quality of included studies was assessed employing the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Analysis was performed per Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 28 papers were included in the systematic review, 13 for preoperative meta-analysis, and 17 for postoperative meta-analysis. Postoperative scores in all 3 quality of life domains (psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being) and satisfaction with breasts increased significantly after reduction mammoplasty compared with preoperative scores. Satisfaction with breasts showed the greatest improvement, from 22.9 to 73.0. Preoperative scores were lower than normative data, with improvement to comparable scores as the healthy population postoperatively. Improvements in BREAST-Q scores did not correlate with patient comorbidities, complication rates, or amount of breast tissue resected. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammoplasty provides marked improvement in BREAST-Q patient-reported quality of life as well established in literature. However, these improvements do not correlate with tissue resection weights, warranting further inquiry of insurance-defined resection requirements.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 12
- $a mamoplastika $x psychologie $7 D016462
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Panayi, Adriana C
- 700 1_
- $a Fischer, Sebastian $1 https://orcid.org/0000000334451902
- 700 1_
- $a Diehm, Yannick F
- 700 1_
- $a Tapking, Christian
- 700 1_
- $a Hundeshagen, Gabriel
- 700 1_
- $a Kneser, Ulrich
- 700 1_
- $a Mastroianni, Melissa
- 700 1_
- $a Pomahac, Bohdan
- 700 1_
- $a Haug, Valentin $1 https://orcid.org/000000022964979X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166521 $t Aesthetic surgery journal $x 1527-330X $g Roč. 43, č. 4 (2023), s. NP231-NP241
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36411260 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240220 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240509113212 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2088858 $s 1212942
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 43 $c 4 $d NP231-NP241 $e 20230315 $i 1527-330X $m Aesthetic surgery journal $n Aesthet. surg. j. $x MED00166521
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240220