-
Something wrong with this record ?
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties
K. Ratislavová, J. Horová, P. Marek
Status not-indexed Language English Country Poland
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2014
Europe PubMed Central
from 2014
ProQuest Central
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-07-29
Open Access Digital Library
from 2014-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2010-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2010-01-01
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 2010-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2010-01-01
Sciendo
from 2010-07-29
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of the quality of care provided. Evaluating women's satisfaction with childbirth is essential to improving obstetric care and ensuring a positive experience for mothers and newborns. The tools used to measure women's satisfaction with childbirth are very heterogeneous and multidimensional. Assessment tools used in practice should be tested and meet characteristics that are consistently validated.The aim is to identify currently available instruments measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth and to evaluate their structure, content and psychometric properties. METHODS: A systematic search for sources was carried out according to the criteria set. For the included studies, psychometric properties were assessed in accordance with the principles of the guideline for completing systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures, COSMIN. RESULTS: The review included 31 studies that reported the psychometric properties of six measurement instruments (questionnaires, scales). Content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and cross-cultural validity were assessed for the included studies. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ/CEQ2) and Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R) were the most commonly used questionnaires in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough testing of tools measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth, and adapting them to cultural and social contexts, is still essential. It is crucial that valid and reliable questionnaires are available for midwives in practice, for use in research, to inform clinical practice and for the results to help develop the services offered.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24005499
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240412130957.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240405s2024 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38517034
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Ratislavová, Kateřina $u University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Health Care Studies, Husova street 11, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000235987322 $7 mzk2008463656
- 245 10
- $a Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties / $c K. Ratislavová, J. Horová, P. Marek
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of the quality of care provided. Evaluating women's satisfaction with childbirth is essential to improving obstetric care and ensuring a positive experience for mothers and newborns. The tools used to measure women's satisfaction with childbirth are very heterogeneous and multidimensional. Assessment tools used in practice should be tested and meet characteristics that are consistently validated.The aim is to identify currently available instruments measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth and to evaluate their structure, content and psychometric properties. METHODS: A systematic search for sources was carried out according to the criteria set. For the included studies, psychometric properties were assessed in accordance with the principles of the guideline for completing systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures, COSMIN. RESULTS: The review included 31 studies that reported the psychometric properties of six measurement instruments (questionnaires, scales). Content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and cross-cultural validity were assessed for the included studies. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ/CEQ2) and Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R) were the most commonly used questionnaires in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough testing of tools measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth, and adapting them to cultural and social contexts, is still essential. It is crucial that valid and reliable questionnaires are available for midwives in practice, for use in research, to inform clinical practice and for the results to help develop the services offered.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Horová, Jana $u University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Health Care Studies, Husova street 11, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000195946066 $7 xx0240649
- 700 1_
- $a Marek, Patrice $u University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Technicka street 8, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245529018
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190087 $t Zdravstveno varstvo $x 0351-0026 $g Roč. 63, č. 2 (2024), s. 100-108
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38517034 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240412130950 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2075934 $s 1215261
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 63 $c 2 $d 100-108 $e 20240320 $i 0351-0026 $m Zdravstveno varstvo $n Zdr Varst $x MED00190087
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240405