-
Something wrong with this record ?
INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice
X. Leleu, HC. Lee, JA. Zonder, M. Macro, K. Ramasamy, C. Hulin, J. Silar, M. Kuhn, K. Ren, N. Bent-Ennakhil, D. Cherepanov, DM. Stull, E. Terpos
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Meta-Analysis, Journal Article
Grant support
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
PubMed
38197267
DOI
10.2217/fon-2023-0604
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Dexamethasone therapeutic use MeSH
- Glycine * analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Lenalidomide therapeutic use MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma * drug therapy MeSH
- Multicenter Studies as Topic MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Boron Compounds therapeutic use MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
Aim: We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Materials & methods: INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit MI 48201 USA
CHU de Bordeaux Bordeaux 33000 France
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno 602 00 Czech Republic
M D Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX 77030 USA
Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington MA 02421 USA
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG Opfikon 8152 Switzerland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006501
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155323.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2217/fon-2023-0604 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38197267
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Leleu, Xavier $u Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, Department of Hematology, CHU La Milétrie-Poitiers, Poitiers, 86000, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000298224170
- 245 10
- $a INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice / $c X. Leleu, HC. Lee, JA. Zonder, M. Macro, K. Ramasamy, C. Hulin, J. Silar, M. Kuhn, K. Ren, N. Bent-Ennakhil, D. Cherepanov, DM. Stull, E. Terpos
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Materials & methods: INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a sloučeniny boru $x terapeutické užití $7 D001896
- 650 _2
- $a dexamethason $x terapeutické užití $7 D003907
- 650 12
- $a glycin $x analogy a deriváty $7 D005998
- 650 _2
- $a lenalidomid $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077269
- 650 _2
- $a multicentrické studie jako téma $7 D015337
- 650 12
- $a mnohočetný myelom $x farmakoterapie $7 D009101
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lee, Hans C $u M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Zonder, Jeffrey A $u Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Macro, Margaret $u CHU de Caen, Caen, 14000, France
- 700 1_
- $a Ramasamy, Karthik $u Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LE, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Hulin, Cyrille $u CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 33000, France
- 700 1_
- $a Silar, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics & Analyses, Ltd, Brno, 602 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kuhn, Matyas $u Institute of Biostatistics & Analyses, Ltd, Brno, 602 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ren, Kaili $u Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA 02421, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Bent-Ennakhil, Nawal $u Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, 8152, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Cherepanov, Dasha $u Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA 02421, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Stull, Dawn Marie $u Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA 02421, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Terpos, Evangelos $u Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens,115 27, Greece
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008687 $t Future oncology $x 1744-8301 $g Roč. 20, č. 14 (2024), s. 935-950
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38197267 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155320 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2080849 $s 1216268
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 20 $c 14 $d 935-950 $e 20240110 $i 1744-8301 $m Future oncology $n Future Oncol $x MED00008687
- GRA __
- $p Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412