• Something wrong with this record ?

Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters

E. Mazzone, G. Gandaglia, D. Robesti, P. Rajwa, J. Gomez Rivas, L. Ibáñez, TFW. Soeterik, L. Bianchi, L. Afferi, C. Kesch, C. Darr, H. Guo, J. Zhuang, F. Zattoni, WP. Fendler, D. Amparore, NA. Huebner, A. Giesen, S. Joniau, R. Schiavina, E....

. 2024 ; 7 (2) : 231-240. [pub] 20230909

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: The role of local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has scarcely been explored. Limited data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP; on the contrary, those more likely to benefit already have systemic disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence in surgically managed PCa patients with lymphadenopathies on a PSMA PET/CT scan by integrating clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PSMA PET/CT parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 519 patients treated with RP and extended lymph node dissection, and who received preoperative PSMA PET between 2017 and 2022 in nine referral centers. Among them, we selected 88 patients with nodal uptake at preoperative PSMA PET (miTxN1M0). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The outcome was PSA persistence, defined as a PSA value of ≥0.1 ng/ml at the first measurement after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the predictors of PSA persistence. Covariates consisted of biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group, clinical stage at MRI, and number of positive spots at a PET/CT scan. A regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, lymph node invasion (LNI) was detected in 63 patients (72%) and 32 (36%) experienced PSA persistence after RP. At multivariable analyses, having more than two lymph nodal positive findings at PSMA PET, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at MRI, and ISUP grade group >3 at biopsy were independent predictors of PSA persistence (all p < 0.05). At the regression tree analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups according to biopsy ISUP grade, number of positive findings at PET/CT, and clinical stage at MRI. The model depicted good discrimination at internal validation (area under the curve 78%). CONCLUSIONS: One out of three miN1M0 patients showed PSA persistence after surgery. Patients with ISUP grade 2-3, as well as patients with organ-confined disease at MRI and a single or two positive nodal findings at PET are those in whom RP may achieve the best oncological outcomes in the context of a multimodal approach. Conversely, patients with a high ISUP grade and extracapsular extension or SVI or more than two spots at PSMA PET should be considered as potentially affected by systemic disease upfront. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our novel and straightforward risk classification integrates currently available preoperative risk tools and should, therefore, assist physician in preoperative counseling of men candidates for radical treatment for prostate cancer with positive lymph node uptake at prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.

Department of Nuclear Medicine IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milan Italy

Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Duisburg Essen Germany

Department of Oncology Division of Urology San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital Turin Italy

Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Drum Tower Hospital Medical School of Nanjing University Institute of Urology Nanjing University Jiangsu China

Department of Urology Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid Spain

Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Luzern Switzerland

Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology St Antonius Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands

Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Department of Urology West German Cancer Center University of Duisburg Essen Germany

Department Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology Urologic Unit University of Padova Padua Italy

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Division of Urology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Bologna Italy

German Cancer Consortium University Hospital Essen Essen Germany

Unit of Urology Division of Oncology Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24006628
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155417.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37689506
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Mazzone, Elio $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: mazzone.elio@hsr.it
245    10
$a Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters / $c E. Mazzone, G. Gandaglia, D. Robesti, P. Rajwa, J. Gomez Rivas, L. Ibáñez, TFW. Soeterik, L. Bianchi, L. Afferi, C. Kesch, C. Darr, H. Guo, J. Zhuang, F. Zattoni, WP. Fendler, D. Amparore, NA. Huebner, A. Giesen, S. Joniau, R. Schiavina, E. Brunocilla, A. Mattei, F. Dal Moro, J. Moreno Sierra, F. Porpiglia, M. Picchio, A. Chiti, R. van den Bergh, SF. Shariat, F. Montorsi, A. Briganti
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The role of local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has scarcely been explored. Limited data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP; on the contrary, those more likely to benefit already have systemic disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence in surgically managed PCa patients with lymphadenopathies on a PSMA PET/CT scan by integrating clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PSMA PET/CT parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 519 patients treated with RP and extended lymph node dissection, and who received preoperative PSMA PET between 2017 and 2022 in nine referral centers. Among them, we selected 88 patients with nodal uptake at preoperative PSMA PET (miTxN1M0). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The outcome was PSA persistence, defined as a PSA value of ≥0.1 ng/ml at the first measurement after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the predictors of PSA persistence. Covariates consisted of biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group, clinical stage at MRI, and number of positive spots at a PET/CT scan. A regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, lymph node invasion (LNI) was detected in 63 patients (72%) and 32 (36%) experienced PSA persistence after RP. At multivariable analyses, having more than two lymph nodal positive findings at PSMA PET, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at MRI, and ISUP grade group >3 at biopsy were independent predictors of PSA persistence (all p < 0.05). At the regression tree analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups according to biopsy ISUP grade, number of positive findings at PET/CT, and clinical stage at MRI. The model depicted good discrimination at internal validation (area under the curve 78%). CONCLUSIONS: One out of three miN1M0 patients showed PSA persistence after surgery. Patients with ISUP grade 2-3, as well as patients with organ-confined disease at MRI and a single or two positive nodal findings at PET are those in whom RP may achieve the best oncological outcomes in the context of a multimodal approach. Conversely, patients with a high ISUP grade and extracapsular extension or SVI or more than two spots at PSMA PET should be considered as potentially affected by systemic disease upfront. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our novel and straightforward risk classification integrates currently available preoperative risk tools and should, therefore, assist physician in preoperative counseling of men candidates for radical treatment for prostate cancer with positive lymph node uptake at prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prostatický specifický antigen $7 D017430
650    _2
$a prostata $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D011467
650    _2
$a PET/CT $x metody $7 D000072078
650    _2
$a semenné váčky $x patologie $7 D012669
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $x patologie $7 D008207
650    12
$a nádory prostaty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a lymfatické uzliny $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D008198
650    _2
$a prostatektomie $7 D011468
650    _2
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    12
$a lymfadenopatie $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D000072281
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Gandaglia, Giorgio $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Robesti, Daniele $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
700    1_
$a Gomez Rivas, Juan $u Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Ibáñez, Laura $u Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Soeterik, Timo F W $u Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Bianchi, Lorenzo $u Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
700    1_
$a Afferi, Luca $u Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Kesch, Claudia $u Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
700    1_
$a Darr, Christopher $u Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
700    1_
$a Guo, Hongqian $u Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
700    1_
$a Zhuang, Junlong $u Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
700    1_
$a Zattoni, Fabio $u Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
700    1_
$a Fendler, Wolfgang P $u German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany
700    1_
$a Amparore, Daniele $u Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Huebner, Nicolai A $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Giesen, Alexander $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Joniau, Steven $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Schiavina, Riccardo $u Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
700    1_
$a Brunocilla, Eugenio $u Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
700    1_
$a Mattei, Agostino $u Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Dal Moro, Fabrizio $u Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
700    1_
$a Moreno Sierra, Jesus $u Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Porpiglia, Francesco $u Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Picchio, Maria $u Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Chiti, Arturo $u Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a van den Bergh, Roderick $u Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Montorsi, Francesco $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
773    0_
$w MED00205913 $t European urology oncology $x 2588-9311 $g Roč. 7, č. 2 (2024), s. 231-240
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37689506 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155414 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2080939 $s 1216395
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 7 $c 2 $d 231-240 $e 20230909 $i 2588-9311 $m European urology oncology $n Eur Urol Oncol $x MED00205913
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...