• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of different regimens of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy

E. Krsakova, A. Cermak, M. Fedorko

. 2024 ; 145 (-) : 83-87. [pub] 20240112

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24006918

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignant solid tumour in men aged >70 years and is the second most common cause of death from oncological circumstances. AIM: To evaluate the effect of different short-term prophylactic antibiotic regimens in transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) on the incidence of infectious complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided PB between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in the prospective randomized study. According to the regimen of prophylaxis, patients were randomized into three groups: (1) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before the procedure + ciprofloxacin 500 mg, 2 h before the procedure; (2) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before and 24 h after the procedure; (3) ciprofloxacin 500 mg 12, 2 h before the procedure, and 12 h after the procedure. A rectal swab was performed 1-2 weeks before PB to evaluate the culture findings. Complications were evaluated during follow-up visits within one month after PB. FINDINGS: In the monitored period, 605 PBs were performed, and 544 patients met the inclusion criteria (184, 161, and 199 in groups 1, 2, and 3). Infectious complications occurred in 10 cases (1.83%), namely 3, 4, and 3 according to patient groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the individual groups. None of the patients required hospitalization and all were free of symptoms of sepsis. CONCLUSION: Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in PB using fosfomycin trometamol, ciprofloxacin, or their combination appears to be effective. Fosfomycin trometamol is a suitable alternative to fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24006918
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155557.0
007      
ta
008      
240412e20240112enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.12.012 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38219833
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Krsakova, E $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia
245    10
$a Comparison of different regimens of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy / $c E. Krsakova, A. Cermak, M. Fedorko
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignant solid tumour in men aged >70 years and is the second most common cause of death from oncological circumstances. AIM: To evaluate the effect of different short-term prophylactic antibiotic regimens in transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) on the incidence of infectious complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided PB between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in the prospective randomized study. According to the regimen of prophylaxis, patients were randomized into three groups: (1) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before the procedure + ciprofloxacin 500 mg, 2 h before the procedure; (2) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before and 24 h after the procedure; (3) ciprofloxacin 500 mg 12, 2 h before the procedure, and 12 h after the procedure. A rectal swab was performed 1-2 weeks before PB to evaluate the culture findings. Complications were evaluated during follow-up visits within one month after PB. FINDINGS: In the monitored period, 605 PBs were performed, and 544 patients met the inclusion criteria (184, 161, and 199 in groups 1, 2, and 3). Infectious complications occurred in 10 cases (1.83%), namely 3, 4, and 3 according to patient groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the individual groups. None of the patients required hospitalization and all were free of symptoms of sepsis. CONCLUSION: Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in PB using fosfomycin trometamol, ciprofloxacin, or their combination appears to be effective. Fosfomycin trometamol is a suitable alternative to fluoroquinolone antibiotics.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a prostata $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D011467
650    _2
$a antibiotická profylaxe $x metody $7 D019072
650    12
$a fosfomycin $x terapeutické užití $7 D005578
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a tromethamin $7 D014325
650    _2
$a rektum $7 D012007
650    _2
$a biopsie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D001706
650    _2
$a ciprofloxacin $x terapeutické užití $7 D002939
650    _2
$a antibakteriální látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cermak, A $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Fedorko, M $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Electronic address: fedorko.michal@fnbrno.cz
773    0_
$w MED00002716 $t The Journal of hospital infection $x 1532-2939 $g Roč. 145 (20240112), s. 83-87
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38219833 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155554 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081099 $s 1216685
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 145 $c - $d 83-87 $e 20240112 $i 1532-2939 $m The Journal of hospital infection $n J Hosp Infect $x MED00002716
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...