Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prolonged use of closed-loop inspired oxygen support in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial

TMR. Schouten, A. Abu-Hanna, AH. van Kaam, MEN. van den Heuvel, TE. Bachman, RW. van Leuteren, GJ. Hutten, W. Onland

. 2024 ; 109 (2) : 221-226. [pub] 20240219

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007099
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci

OBJECTIVE: This randomised study in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support investigated the effectiveness of automated oxygen control (A-FiO2) in keeping the oxygen saturation (SpO2) within a target range (TR) during a 28-day period compared with manual titration (M-FiO2). DESIGN: A single-centre randomised control trial. SETTING: A level III neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation) on non-invasive respiratory support. INTERVENTIONS: A-FiO2 versus M-FiO2 control. METHODS: Main outcomes were the proportion of time spent and median area of episodes in the TR, hyperoxaemia, hypoxaemia and the trend over 28 days using a linear random intercept model. RESULTS: 23 preterm infants (median gestation 25.7 weeks; birth weight 820 g) were randomised. Compared with M-FiO2, the time spent within TR was higher in the A-FiO2 group (68.7% vs 48.0%, p<0.001). Infants in the A-FiO2 group spent less time in hyperoxaemia (13.8% vs 37.7%, p<0.001), but no difference was found in hypoxaemia. The time-based analyses showed that the A-FiO2 efficacy may differ over time, especially for hypoxaemia. Compared with the M-FiO2 group, the A-FiO2 group had a larger intercept but with an inversed slope for the daily median area below the TR (intercept 70.1 vs 36.3; estimate/day -0.70 vs 0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A-FiO2 control was superior to manual control in keeping preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support in a prespecified TR over a period of 28 days. This improvement may come at the expense of increased time below the TR in the first days after initiating A-FiO2 control. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6731.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007099
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155723.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325831 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37827816
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Schouten, Tim M R $u Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $u Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
245    10
$a Prolonged use of closed-loop inspired oxygen support in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial / $c TMR. Schouten, A. Abu-Hanna, AH. van Kaam, MEN. van den Heuvel, TE. Bachman, RW. van Leuteren, GJ. Hutten, W. Onland
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: This randomised study in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support investigated the effectiveness of automated oxygen control (A-FiO2) in keeping the oxygen saturation (SpO2) within a target range (TR) during a 28-day period compared with manual titration (M-FiO2). DESIGN: A single-centre randomised control trial. SETTING: A level III neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation) on non-invasive respiratory support. INTERVENTIONS: A-FiO2 versus M-FiO2 control. METHODS: Main outcomes were the proportion of time spent and median area of episodes in the TR, hyperoxaemia, hypoxaemia and the trend over 28 days using a linear random intercept model. RESULTS: 23 preterm infants (median gestation 25.7 weeks; birth weight 820 g) were randomised. Compared with M-FiO2, the time spent within TR was higher in the A-FiO2 group (68.7% vs 48.0%, p<0.001). Infants in the A-FiO2 group spent less time in hyperoxaemia (13.8% vs 37.7%, p<0.001), but no difference was found in hypoxaemia. The time-based analyses showed that the A-FiO2 efficacy may differ over time, especially for hypoxaemia. Compared with the M-FiO2 group, the A-FiO2 group had a larger intercept but with an inversed slope for the daily median area below the TR (intercept 70.1 vs 36.3; estimate/day -0.70 vs 0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A-FiO2 control was superior to manual control in keeping preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support in a prespecified TR over a period of 28 days. This improvement may come at the expense of increased time below the TR in the first days after initiating A-FiO2 control. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6731.
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
650    12
$a kyslík $7 D010100
650    _2
$a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
650    _2
$a porodní hmotnost $7 D001724
650    _2
$a hypoxie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000860
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Abu-Hanna, Ameen $u Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $u Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a van Kaam, Anton H $u Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $u Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a van den Heuvel, Maria E N $u Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Bachman, Thomas E $u Czech Technical University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000239689402
700    1_
$a van Leuteren, Ruud W $u Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $u Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000184682544
700    1_
$a Hutten, G Jeroen $u Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $u Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Onland, Wes $u Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands w.onland@amsterdamumc.nl $u Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000296230606
773    0_
$w MED00004943 $t Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition $x 1468-2052 $g Roč. 109, č. 2 (2024), s. 221-226
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37827816 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155719 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081222 $s 1216866
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 109 $c 2 $d 221-226 $e 20240219 $i 1468-2052 $m Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition $n Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed $x MED00004943
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...