Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study

S. Elavsky, L. Knapova, K. Janiš, R. Cimler, J. Kuhnova, T. Cernicky

. 2024 ; 26 (-) : e45492. [pub] 20240207

Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007187

BACKGROUND: Despite the ever-increasing offering of SMART technologies (ie, computer-controlled devices acting intelligently and capable of monitoring, analyzing or reporting), a wide gap exists between the development of new technological innovations and their adoption in everyday care for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the barriers and concerns related to the adoption of SMART technologies among different groups of stakeholders. METHODS: Data from 4 sources were used: semistructured in-person or internet-based interviews with professional caregivers (n=12), structured email interviews with experts in the area of aging (n=9), a web-based survey of older adults (>55 years) attending the Virtual University of the Third Age (n=369), and a case study on the adoption of new technology by an older adult care facility. RESULTS: Although all stakeholders noted the potential of SMART technologies to improve older adult care, multiple barriers to their adoption were identified. Caregivers perceived older adults as disinterested or incompetent in using technology, reported preferring known strategies over new technologies, and noted own fears of using technology. Experts viewed technologies as essential but expressed concerns about cost, low digital competency of older adults, and lack of support or willingness to implement technologies in older adult care. Older adults reported few concerns overall, but among the mentioned concerns were lack of ability or interest, misuse of data, and limited usefulness (in specific subgroups or situations). In addition, older adults' ratings of the usefulness of different technologies correlated with their self-rating of digital competency (r=0.258; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults appeared to have more positive views of various technologies than professional caregivers; however, their concerns varied by the type of technology. Lack of competence and lack of support were among the common themes, suggesting that educationally oriented programs for both older adults and their caregivers should be pursued.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007187
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155758.0
007      
ta
008      
240412e20240207xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2196/45492 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38324345
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Elavsky, Steriani $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250700481 $7 xx0234975
245    10
$a Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study / $c S. Elavsky, L. Knapova, K. Janiš, R. Cimler, J. Kuhnova, T. Cernicky
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Despite the ever-increasing offering of SMART technologies (ie, computer-controlled devices acting intelligently and capable of monitoring, analyzing or reporting), a wide gap exists between the development of new technological innovations and their adoption in everyday care for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the barriers and concerns related to the adoption of SMART technologies among different groups of stakeholders. METHODS: Data from 4 sources were used: semistructured in-person or internet-based interviews with professional caregivers (n=12), structured email interviews with experts in the area of aging (n=9), a web-based survey of older adults (>55 years) attending the Virtual University of the Third Age (n=369), and a case study on the adoption of new technology by an older adult care facility. RESULTS: Although all stakeholders noted the potential of SMART technologies to improve older adult care, multiple barriers to their adoption were identified. Caregivers perceived older adults as disinterested or incompetent in using technology, reported preferring known strategies over new technologies, and noted own fears of using technology. Experts viewed technologies as essential but expressed concerns about cost, low digital competency of older adults, and lack of support or willingness to implement technologies in older adult care. Older adults reported few concerns overall, but among the mentioned concerns were lack of ability or interest, misuse of data, and limited usefulness (in specific subgroups or situations). In addition, older adults' ratings of the usefulness of different technologies correlated with their self-rating of digital competency (r=0.258; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults appeared to have more positive views of various technologies than professional caregivers; however, their concerns varied by the type of technology. Lack of competence and lack of support were among the common themes, suggesting that educationally oriented programs for both older adults and their caregivers should be pursued.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a zlepšení kvality $7 D058996
650    12
$a technologie $7 D013672
650    _2
$a stárnutí $7 D000375
650    _2
$a elektronická pošta $7 D034742
650    _2
$a strach $7 D005239
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Knapova, Lenka $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213668961
700    1_
$a Janiš, Kamil $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171842289
700    1_
$a Cimler, Richard $u Anume Ltd, Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000167129894
700    1_
$a Kuhnova, Jitka $u Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Karlove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000192235672
700    1_
$a Cernicky, Tomas $u SeneCura SeniorCentrum HŠH Inc, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000368185953
773    0_
$w MED00007388 $t JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $x 1438-8871 $g Roč. 26 (20240207), s. e45492
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38324345 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155754 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081272 $s 1216954
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 26 $c - $d e45492 $e 20240207 $i 1438-8871 $m JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $n J Med Internat Res $x MED00007388
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...