-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study
S. Elavsky, L. Knapova, K. Janiš, R. Cimler, J. Kuhnova, T. Cernicky
Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 1999
Free Medical Journals
od 1999
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1999
PubMed Central
od 1999
Europe PubMed Central
od 1999
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2005-02-24
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1999
PubMed
38324345
DOI
10.2196/45492
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- elektronická pošta MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stárnutí MeSH
- strach MeSH
- technologie * MeSH
- zlepšení kvality * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Despite the ever-increasing offering of SMART technologies (ie, computer-controlled devices acting intelligently and capable of monitoring, analyzing or reporting), a wide gap exists between the development of new technological innovations and their adoption in everyday care for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the barriers and concerns related to the adoption of SMART technologies among different groups of stakeholders. METHODS: Data from 4 sources were used: semistructured in-person or internet-based interviews with professional caregivers (n=12), structured email interviews with experts in the area of aging (n=9), a web-based survey of older adults (>55 years) attending the Virtual University of the Third Age (n=369), and a case study on the adoption of new technology by an older adult care facility. RESULTS: Although all stakeholders noted the potential of SMART technologies to improve older adult care, multiple barriers to their adoption were identified. Caregivers perceived older adults as disinterested or incompetent in using technology, reported preferring known strategies over new technologies, and noted own fears of using technology. Experts viewed technologies as essential but expressed concerns about cost, low digital competency of older adults, and lack of support or willingness to implement technologies in older adult care. Older adults reported few concerns overall, but among the mentioned concerns were lack of ability or interest, misuse of data, and limited usefulness (in specific subgroups or situations). In addition, older adults' ratings of the usefulness of different technologies correlated with their self-rating of digital competency (r=0.258; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults appeared to have more positive views of various technologies than professional caregivers; however, their concerns varied by the type of technology. Lack of competence and lack of support were among the common themes, suggesting that educationally oriented programs for both older adults and their caregivers should be pursued.
Anume Ltd Hradec Kralové Czech Republic
Department of Human Movement Studies University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Faculty of Science University of Hradec Karlove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007187
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155758.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412e20240207xxc f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2196/45492 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38324345
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxc
- 100 1_
- $a Elavsky, Steriani $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250700481 $7 xx0234975
- 245 10
- $a Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study / $c S. Elavsky, L. Knapova, K. Janiš, R. Cimler, J. Kuhnova, T. Cernicky
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Despite the ever-increasing offering of SMART technologies (ie, computer-controlled devices acting intelligently and capable of monitoring, analyzing or reporting), a wide gap exists between the development of new technological innovations and their adoption in everyday care for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the barriers and concerns related to the adoption of SMART technologies among different groups of stakeholders. METHODS: Data from 4 sources were used: semistructured in-person or internet-based interviews with professional caregivers (n=12), structured email interviews with experts in the area of aging (n=9), a web-based survey of older adults (>55 years) attending the Virtual University of the Third Age (n=369), and a case study on the adoption of new technology by an older adult care facility. RESULTS: Although all stakeholders noted the potential of SMART technologies to improve older adult care, multiple barriers to their adoption were identified. Caregivers perceived older adults as disinterested or incompetent in using technology, reported preferring known strategies over new technologies, and noted own fears of using technology. Experts viewed technologies as essential but expressed concerns about cost, low digital competency of older adults, and lack of support or willingness to implement technologies in older adult care. Older adults reported few concerns overall, but among the mentioned concerns were lack of ability or interest, misuse of data, and limited usefulness (in specific subgroups or situations). In addition, older adults' ratings of the usefulness of different technologies correlated with their self-rating of digital competency (r=0.258; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults appeared to have more positive views of various technologies than professional caregivers; however, their concerns varied by the type of technology. Lack of competence and lack of support were among the common themes, suggesting that educationally oriented programs for both older adults and their caregivers should be pursued.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a zlepšení kvality $7 D058996
- 650 12
- $a technologie $7 D013672
- 650 _2
- $a stárnutí $7 D000375
- 650 _2
- $a elektronická pošta $7 D034742
- 650 _2
- $a strach $7 D005239
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Knapova, Lenka $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213668961
- 700 1_
- $a Janiš, Kamil $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171842289
- 700 1_
- $a Cimler, Richard $u Anume Ltd, Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000167129894
- 700 1_
- $a Kuhnova, Jitka $u Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Karlove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000192235672
- 700 1_
- $a Cernicky, Tomas $u SeneCura SeniorCentrum HŠH Inc, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000368185953
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007388 $t JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $x 1438-8871 $g Roč. 26 (20240207), s. e45492
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38324345 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155754 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081272 $s 1216954
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 26 $c - $d e45492 $e 20240207 $i 1438-8871 $m JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $n J Med Internat Res $x MED00007388
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412