-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID
M. Klírová, A. Adamová, N. Biačková, O. Laskov, V. Renková, Z. Stuchlíková, K. Odnohová, T. Novák
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NU22-D-133
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic)
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2021-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2021-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
od 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * terapie MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- postakutní syndrom COVID-19 MeSH
- prefrontální mozková kůra fyziologie MeSH
- přímá transkraniální stimulace mozku * MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
The study aimed to assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), known as the long COVID. A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of prefrontal cortex active tDCS to sham-tDCS in treating NP-PASC. Patients diagnosed with NP-PASC, with a Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) score ≥ 40, were eligible for the study. Twenty tDCS sessions were administered within four weeks, with continuous, end-of-treatment, and follow-up measurements. The primary outcome was a change in the FIS at the end-of-treatment, analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Data from 33 patients assigned to active (n = 16) or sham-tDCS (n = 17) were analyzed. After the treatment, a decrease in the FIS score was more pronounced in the sham than in the active group, yet the intergroup difference was insignificant (11.7 [95% CI -11.1 to 34.5], p = 0.6). Furthermore, no significant intergroup differences were observed regarding anxiety, depression, quality of life, and cognitive performance. The small cohort sample, differences in baseline FIS scores between groups (non-stratified randomization), or chosen stimulation parameters may have influenced our findings. However, it might also be possible that the expected mechanism of action of tDCS is insufficient to treat these conditions.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007510
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423160026.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-024-52763-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38272997
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Klírová, Monika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic. klirovamonika@gmail.com $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. klirovamonika@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID / $c M. Klírová, A. Adamová, N. Biačková, O. Laskov, V. Renková, Z. Stuchlíková, K. Odnohová, T. Novák
- 520 9_
- $a The study aimed to assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), known as the long COVID. A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of prefrontal cortex active tDCS to sham-tDCS in treating NP-PASC. Patients diagnosed with NP-PASC, with a Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) score ≥ 40, were eligible for the study. Twenty tDCS sessions were administered within four weeks, with continuous, end-of-treatment, and follow-up measurements. The primary outcome was a change in the FIS at the end-of-treatment, analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Data from 33 patients assigned to active (n = 16) or sham-tDCS (n = 17) were analyzed. After the treatment, a decrease in the FIS score was more pronounced in the sham than in the active group, yet the intergroup difference was insignificant (11.7 [95% CI -11.1 to 34.5], p = 0.6). Furthermore, no significant intergroup differences were observed regarding anxiety, depression, quality of life, and cognitive performance. The small cohort sample, differences in baseline FIS scores between groups (non-stratified randomization), or chosen stimulation parameters may have influenced our findings. However, it might also be possible that the expected mechanism of action of tDCS is insufficient to treat these conditions.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a přímá transkraniální stimulace mozku $7 D065908
- 650 _2
- $a postakutní syndrom COVID-19 $7 D000094024
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 12
- $a COVID-19 $x terapie $7 D000086382
- 650 _2
- $a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
- 650 _2
- $a prefrontální mozková kůra $x fyziologie $7 D017397
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Adamová, Andrea $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Biačková, Nina $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Laskov, Olga $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Renková, Veronika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stuchlíková, Zuzana $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Odnohová, Karolína $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Novák, Tomáš $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 14, č. 1 (2024), s. 2193
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38272997 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423160022 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081485 $s 1217277
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 14 $c 1 $d 2193 $e 20240125 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- GRA __
- $a NU22-D-133 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic)
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412