-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The comparison of magnetic resonance and fluoroscopic imaging options in the preoperative assessment of boys with anorectal malformations and a colostomy
D. Máslová, Z. Holubová, L. Poš, N. Newland, M. Pavlíková, R. Škába, M. Kynčl
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- anorektální malformace * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- kolostomie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční spektroskopie MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody MeSH
- rektální píštěl * chirurgie MeSH
- rektum diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie abnormality MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: In recent decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained prominence as a standard diagnostic method for preoperative assessment in patients with anorectal malformations and a colostomy, with the potential to replace the classic fluoroscopic distal pressure colostogram (FDPC). Three MRI techniques are available: MRI-distal pressure colostogram with gadolinium (MRI-DPCG) or saline (MRI-DPCS) instillation into the colostomy and native MRI without colostomy instillation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (native MRI, MRI-DPCG and MRI-DPCS) in the preoperative workup of boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and to compare it to FDPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two boys with preoperative MRI using one of the three approaches and 43 with FDPC met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. The presence and localization of rectal fistulas according to the Krickenbeck classification were evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The accuracy of fistula detection for MRI in general (regardless of the technique), MRI-DPCS, MRI-DPCG, native MRI and FDPC was 95% (59/62, P<0.001), 100% (12/12, P=0.03), 100% (30/30, P<0.001), 85% (17/20, P=0.41) and 72% (31/43, P=0.82), respectively. The accuracy of describing fistula type in patients with a correctly detected fistula using these methods was 96% (45/47, P<0.001), 100% (9/9, P<0.001), 100% (23/23, P<0.001), 87% (13/15, P<0.001) and 67% (13/21, P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a reliable method for detecting and classifying fistulas in boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and can be considered the modality of first choice for preoperative workup.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007768
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423160238.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00247-023-05816-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38038736
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Máslová, Darja $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic. daryamaslava@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0009000578385005
- 245 14
- $a The comparison of magnetic resonance and fluoroscopic imaging options in the preoperative assessment of boys with anorectal malformations and a colostomy / $c D. Máslová, Z. Holubová, L. Poš, N. Newland, M. Pavlíková, R. Škába, M. Kynčl
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In recent decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained prominence as a standard diagnostic method for preoperative assessment in patients with anorectal malformations and a colostomy, with the potential to replace the classic fluoroscopic distal pressure colostogram (FDPC). Three MRI techniques are available: MRI-distal pressure colostogram with gadolinium (MRI-DPCG) or saline (MRI-DPCS) instillation into the colostomy and native MRI without colostomy instillation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (native MRI, MRI-DPCG and MRI-DPCS) in the preoperative workup of boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and to compare it to FDPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two boys with preoperative MRI using one of the three approaches and 43 with FDPC met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. The presence and localization of rectal fistulas according to the Krickenbeck classification were evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The accuracy of fistula detection for MRI in general (regardless of the technique), MRI-DPCS, MRI-DPCG, native MRI and FDPC was 95% (59/62, P<0.001), 100% (12/12, P=0.03), 100% (30/30, P<0.001), 85% (17/20, P=0.41) and 72% (31/43, P=0.82), respectively. The accuracy of describing fistula type in patients with a correctly detected fistula using these methods was 96% (45/47, P<0.001), 100% (9/9, P<0.001), 100% (23/23, P<0.001), 87% (13/15, P<0.001) and 67% (13/21, P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a reliable method for detecting and classifying fistulas in boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and can be considered the modality of first choice for preoperative workup.
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a anorektální malformace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000071056
- 650 _2
- $a rektum $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x abnormality $7 D012007
- 650 _2
- $a kolostomie $7 D003125
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 650 12
- $a rektální píštěl $x chirurgie $7 D012003
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční spektroskopie $7 D009682
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Holubová, Zuzana $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Poš, Lucie $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Newland, Natália $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlíková, Markéta $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343144357 $7 xx0093283
- 700 1_
- $a Škába, Richard $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kynčl, Martin $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000162106351
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003740 $t Pediatric radiology $x 1432-1998 $g Roč. 54, č. 1 (2024), s. 68-81
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38038736 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423160234 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081635 $s 1217535
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 54 $c 1 $d 68-81 $e 20231201 $i 1432-1998 $m Pediatric radiology $n Pediatr Radiol $x MED00003740
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412