Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The comparison of magnetic resonance and fluoroscopic imaging options in the preoperative assessment of boys with anorectal malformations and a colostomy

D. Máslová, Z. Holubová, L. Poš, N. Newland, M. Pavlíková, R. Škába, M. Kynčl

. 2024 ; 54 (1) : 68-81. [pub] 20231201

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007768
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) od 2008-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Family Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained prominence as a standard diagnostic method for preoperative assessment in patients with anorectal malformations and a colostomy, with the potential to replace the classic fluoroscopic distal pressure colostogram (FDPC). Three MRI techniques are available: MRI-distal pressure colostogram with gadolinium (MRI-DPCG) or saline (MRI-DPCS) instillation into the colostomy and native MRI without colostomy instillation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (native MRI, MRI-DPCG and MRI-DPCS) in the preoperative workup of boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and to compare it to FDPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two boys with preoperative MRI using one of the three approaches and 43 with FDPC met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. The presence and localization of rectal fistulas according to the Krickenbeck classification were evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The accuracy of fistula detection for MRI in general (regardless of the technique), MRI-DPCS, MRI-DPCG, native MRI and FDPC was 95% (59/62, P<0.001), 100% (12/12, P=0.03), 100% (30/30, P<0.001), 85% (17/20, P=0.41) and 72% (31/43, P=0.82), respectively. The accuracy of describing fistula type in patients with a correctly detected fistula using these methods was 96% (45/47, P<0.001), 100% (9/9, P<0.001), 100% (23/23, P<0.001), 87% (13/15, P<0.001) and 67% (13/21, P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a reliable method for detecting and classifying fistulas in boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and can be considered the modality of first choice for preoperative workup.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007768
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423160238.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00247-023-05816-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38038736
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Máslová, Darja $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic. daryamaslava@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0009000578385005
245    14
$a The comparison of magnetic resonance and fluoroscopic imaging options in the preoperative assessment of boys with anorectal malformations and a colostomy / $c D. Máslová, Z. Holubová, L. Poš, N. Newland, M. Pavlíková, R. Škába, M. Kynčl
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In recent decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained prominence as a standard diagnostic method for preoperative assessment in patients with anorectal malformations and a colostomy, with the potential to replace the classic fluoroscopic distal pressure colostogram (FDPC). Three MRI techniques are available: MRI-distal pressure colostogram with gadolinium (MRI-DPCG) or saline (MRI-DPCS) instillation into the colostomy and native MRI without colostomy instillation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (native MRI, MRI-DPCG and MRI-DPCS) in the preoperative workup of boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and to compare it to FDPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two boys with preoperative MRI using one of the three approaches and 43 with FDPC met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. The presence and localization of rectal fistulas according to the Krickenbeck classification were evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The accuracy of fistula detection for MRI in general (regardless of the technique), MRI-DPCS, MRI-DPCG, native MRI and FDPC was 95% (59/62, P<0.001), 100% (12/12, P=0.03), 100% (30/30, P<0.001), 85% (17/20, P=0.41) and 72% (31/43, P=0.82), respectively. The accuracy of describing fistula type in patients with a correctly detected fistula using these methods was 96% (45/47, P<0.001), 100% (9/9, P<0.001), 100% (23/23, P<0.001), 87% (13/15, P<0.001) and 67% (13/21, P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a reliable method for detecting and classifying fistulas in boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and can be considered the modality of first choice for preoperative workup.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a anorektální malformace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000071056
650    _2
$a rektum $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x abnormality $7 D012007
650    _2
$a kolostomie $7 D003125
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    12
$a rektální píštěl $x chirurgie $7 D012003
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční spektroskopie $7 D009682
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Holubová, Zuzana $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Poš, Lucie $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Newland, Natália $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pavlíková, Markéta $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343144357 $7 xx0093283
700    1_
$a Škába, Richard $u Department of Paediatric Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kynčl, Martin $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000162106351
773    0_
$w MED00003740 $t Pediatric radiology $x 1432-1998 $g Roč. 54, č. 1 (2024), s. 68-81
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38038736 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423160234 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081635 $s 1217535
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 54 $c 1 $d 68-81 $e 20231201 $i 1432-1998 $m Pediatric radiology $n Pediatr Radiol $x MED00003740
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...