-
Something wrong with this record ?
Restoring the spontaneous smile through free functional muscle transfer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the last twenty years' experience
KC. Bayezid, S. Morkuzu, E. Karabulut, A. Bajus, L. Streit
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Facial Paralysis * surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Masseter Muscle innervation MeSH
- Nerve Transfer * methods MeSH
- Facial Nerve surgery MeSH
- Smiling physiology MeSH
- Facial Expression MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: The recovery of the spontaneous smile has become a primary focus in facial reanimation surgery and its major determinant is the selected neurotizer. We aimed to compare the spontaneity outcomes of the most preferred neurotization methods in free functional muscle transfer for long-standing facial paralysis. METHODS: The Embase, Ovid Medline, and PubMed databases were queried with 21 keywords. All clinical studies from the last 20 years reporting the postoperative spontaneity rate for specified neurotization strategies [cross-face nerve graft (CFNG), contralateral facial nerve (CLFN), motor nerve to the masseter (MNM), and dual innervation (DI)] were included. A meta-analysis of prevalence was performed using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, I2 statistic, and generic inverse variance with a random-effects model. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality. RESULTS: The literature search produced 2613 results and 473 unique citations for facial reanimation. Twenty-nine studies including 2046 patients were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of eligible data (1952 observations from 23 studies) showed statistically significant differences between the groups (CFNG: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.00, CLFN: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00, MNM: 0.26; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54, DI: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00, P < 0.001). In pairwise comparisons, statistically significant differences were found between MNM and other neurotization strategies (P < 0.001 in CFNG compared with MNM, P = 0.013 for CLFN compared with MNM, P < 0.001 for DI compared with MNM). CONCLUSIONS: DI- and CLFN-driven strategies achieved the most promising outcomes, whereas MNM showed the potential to elicit spontaneous smile at a lower extent. Our meta-analysis was limited primarily by incongruency between spontaneity assessment systems. Consensus on a standardized tool would enable more effective comparisons of the outcomes.
Department of Biostatistics Faculty of Medicine Hacettepe University Ankara Turkey
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007792
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240618104352.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412e20231031ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.124 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37988971
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Bayezid, K Can $u Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Restoring the spontaneous smile through free functional muscle transfer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the last twenty years' experience / $c KC. Bayezid, S. Morkuzu, E. Karabulut, A. Bajus, L. Streit
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The recovery of the spontaneous smile has become a primary focus in facial reanimation surgery and its major determinant is the selected neurotizer. We aimed to compare the spontaneity outcomes of the most preferred neurotization methods in free functional muscle transfer for long-standing facial paralysis. METHODS: The Embase, Ovid Medline, and PubMed databases were queried with 21 keywords. All clinical studies from the last 20 years reporting the postoperative spontaneity rate for specified neurotization strategies [cross-face nerve graft (CFNG), contralateral facial nerve (CLFN), motor nerve to the masseter (MNM), and dual innervation (DI)] were included. A meta-analysis of prevalence was performed using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, I2 statistic, and generic inverse variance with a random-effects model. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality. RESULTS: The literature search produced 2613 results and 473 unique citations for facial reanimation. Twenty-nine studies including 2046 patients were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of eligible data (1952 observations from 23 studies) showed statistically significant differences between the groups (CFNG: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.00, CLFN: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00, MNM: 0.26; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54, DI: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00, P < 0.001). In pairwise comparisons, statistically significant differences were found between MNM and other neurotization strategies (P < 0.001 in CFNG compared with MNM, P = 0.013 for CLFN compared with MNM, P < 0.001 for DI compared with MNM). CONCLUSIONS: DI- and CLFN-driven strategies achieved the most promising outcomes, whereas MNM showed the potential to elicit spontaneous smile at a lower extent. Our meta-analysis was limited primarily by incongruency between spontaneity assessment systems. Consensus on a standardized tool would enable more effective comparisons of the outcomes.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a usmívání se $x fyziologie $7 D012904
- 650 _2
- $a výraz obličeje $7 D005149
- 650 12
- $a faciální paralýza $x chirurgie $7 D005158
- 650 _2
- $a nervus facialis $x chirurgie $7 D005154
- 650 _2
- $a musculus masseter $x inervace $7 D008406
- 650 12
- $a nervový transfer $x metody $7 D016067
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Morkuzu, Suat $u Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- 700 1_
- $a Karabulut, Erdem $u Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Bajus, Adam $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0318567
- 700 1_
- $a Streit, Libor $u Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: libor.streit@med.muni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008968 $t Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery $x 1878-0539 $g Roč. 88 (20231031), s. 196-207
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37988971 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240618104353 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081655 $s 1217559
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 88 $c - $d 196-207 $e 20231031 $i 1878-0539 $m Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery $n J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg $x MED00008968
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412