-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of postural control and space perception outcomes between robotic and conventional cochlear implantation in adults
S. Koutná, P. Kalitová, J. Jeřábek, K. Slabý, K. Kučerová, J. Bouček, O. Čakrt
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
Grantová podpora
GAUK 323721
Charles University Grant Agancy
grant NU21-08-00280
Cooperatio Program
NU20-08-00311
Cooperatio Program
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kochleární implantace * metody MeSH
- kochleární implantáty MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- posturální rovnováha * fyziologie MeSH
- roboticky asistované výkony * metody MeSH
- vnímání prostoru * fyziologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to capture the difference between the groups in direct relation to the type of electrode array insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). The robotic insertion is expected to be a more gently option. As recent studies have shown, there is a difference in perception of visual vertical (SVV) and postural control related to the CI. We assume that there can be differences in postural control and space perception outcomes depending on the type of the surgical method. METHODS: In total, 37 (24 females, mean age ± SD was 42.9 ± 13.0) candidates for CI underwent an assessment. In 14 cases, the insertion of the electrode array was performed by a robotic system (RobOtol, Colin, France) and 23 were performed conventionally. In all of these patients, we performed the same examination before the surgery, the first day, and 3 weeks after the surgery. The protocol consists of static posturography and perception of visual vertical. RESULTS: The both groups, RobOtol and conventional, responded to the procedure similarly despite the dissimilar electrode insertion. There was no difference between two groups in the dynamic of perception SVV and postural parameters. Patients in both groups were statistically significantly affected by the surgical procedure, SVV deviation appeared in the opposite direction from the implanted ear: 0.90° ± 1.25; - 1.67° ± 3.05 and - 0.19° ± 1.78 PRE and POST surgery (p < 0.001). And this deviation was spontaneously adjusted in FOLLOW-UP after 3 weeks (p < 0.01) in the both groups. We did not find a significant difference in postural parameters between the RobOtol and conventional group, even over time. CONCLUSION: Although the robotic system RobOtol allows a substantial reduction in the speed of insertion of the electrode array into the inner ear, our data did not demonstrate a postoperative effect on vestibular functions (SVV and posturography), which have the same character and dynamics as in the group with standard manual insertion. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The project is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05547113).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013344
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133959.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00405-024-08664-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38825603
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Koutná, Sára $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. sara.koutna@fnmotol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0009000875817118
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of postural control and space perception outcomes between robotic and conventional cochlear implantation in adults / $c S. Koutná, P. Kalitová, J. Jeřábek, K. Slabý, K. Kučerová, J. Bouček, O. Čakrt
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to capture the difference between the groups in direct relation to the type of electrode array insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). The robotic insertion is expected to be a more gently option. As recent studies have shown, there is a difference in perception of visual vertical (SVV) and postural control related to the CI. We assume that there can be differences in postural control and space perception outcomes depending on the type of the surgical method. METHODS: In total, 37 (24 females, mean age ± SD was 42.9 ± 13.0) candidates for CI underwent an assessment. In 14 cases, the insertion of the electrode array was performed by a robotic system (RobOtol, Colin, France) and 23 were performed conventionally. In all of these patients, we performed the same examination before the surgery, the first day, and 3 weeks after the surgery. The protocol consists of static posturography and perception of visual vertical. RESULTS: The both groups, RobOtol and conventional, responded to the procedure similarly despite the dissimilar electrode insertion. There was no difference between two groups in the dynamic of perception SVV and postural parameters. Patients in both groups were statistically significantly affected by the surgical procedure, SVV deviation appeared in the opposite direction from the implanted ear: 0.90° ± 1.25; - 1.67° ± 3.05 and - 0.19° ± 1.78 PRE and POST surgery (p < 0.001). And this deviation was spontaneously adjusted in FOLLOW-UP after 3 weeks (p < 0.01) in the both groups. We did not find a significant difference in postural parameters between the RobOtol and conventional group, even over time. CONCLUSION: Although the robotic system RobOtol allows a substantial reduction in the speed of insertion of the electrode array into the inner ear, our data did not demonstrate a postoperative effect on vestibular functions (SVV and posturography), which have the same character and dynamics as in the group with standard manual insertion. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The project is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05547113).
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a kochleární implantace $x metody $7 D019929
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a roboticky asistované výkony $x metody $7 D065287
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a vnímání prostoru $x fyziologie $7 D013028
- 650 12
- $a posturální rovnováha $x fyziologie $7 D004856
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a kochleární implantáty $7 D003054
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Kalitová, Petra $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jeřábek, Jaroslav $u Department of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slabý, Kryštof $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kučerová, Klára $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bouček, Jan $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Čakrt, Ondřej $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009617 $t European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology $x 1434-4726 $g Roč. 281, č. 7 (2024), s. 3839-3843
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38825603 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133953 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143264 $s 1225210
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 281 $c 7 $d 3839-3843 $e 20240602 $i 1434-4726 $m European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology $n Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00009617
- GRA __
- $a GAUK 323721 $p Charles University Grant Agancy
- GRA __
- $a grant NU21-08-00280 $p Cooperatio Program
- GRA __
- $a NU20-08-00311 $p Cooperatio Program
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725