-
Something wrong with this record ?
Variations of the Saphenopopliteal Junction: An Ultrasonography Study in a Young Population, A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis
M. Veselá, M. Beneš, G. Dostálová, . Aleš Linhart, D. Kachlík
Language English Country United States
Document type Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Journal Article, Review
- MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Popliteal Vein * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Saphenous Vein * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
Saphenopopliteal junction classification has been developing, but still the precise knowledge of junction type is crucial for proper surgical treatment. We examined the saphenopopliteal junction by duplex venous scanning in 244 extremities in healthy volunteers (median age: 23.0 years, 83 females, 39 male) and performed a meta-analysis of 13 studies focusing on structural types of the junction. According to Schweighoffer's classification we distinguished 5 types of the junction and we subdivided type A according to Cavezzi's classification of gastrocnemial veins termination into two. We added type F (small saphenous vein-SSV terminates into popliteal vein-PV), described especially in cadaveric studies. In our study, the most frequent type was A1 (96 cases), followed by C (70), B (48), A2 (20), E (6), D (3) and F (0). The pooled prevalence estimate for types A + B + D + E was 54.7% (95% CI 40.9-69.6%) and for type C 24.4% (95% CI 19.3-29.5%), whereas in 17.1% (95% CI 6.3-27.9%) of cases, the SSV terminated in the PV with no cranial extension present. The knowledge of the saphenopopliteal junction and its variations prevalence can help clinicians to quickly identify the real type of the junction during routine examination. In mid-European population, the main type is A1 and worldwide type A.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013426
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133311.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/00033197231164433 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36924269
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Veselá, Michaela $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000237826215
- 245 10
- $a Variations of the Saphenopopliteal Junction: An Ultrasonography Study in a Young Population, A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis / $c M. Veselá, M. Beneš, G. Dostálová, . Aleš Linhart, D. Kachlík
- 520 9_
- $a Saphenopopliteal junction classification has been developing, but still the precise knowledge of junction type is crucial for proper surgical treatment. We examined the saphenopopliteal junction by duplex venous scanning in 244 extremities in healthy volunteers (median age: 23.0 years, 83 females, 39 male) and performed a meta-analysis of 13 studies focusing on structural types of the junction. According to Schweighoffer's classification we distinguished 5 types of the junction and we subdivided type A according to Cavezzi's classification of gastrocnemial veins termination into two. We added type F (small saphenous vein-SSV terminates into popliteal vein-PV), described especially in cadaveric studies. In our study, the most frequent type was A1 (96 cases), followed by C (70), B (48), A2 (20), E (6), D (3) and F (0). The pooled prevalence estimate for types A + B + D + E was 54.7% (95% CI 40.9-69.6%) and for type C 24.4% (95% CI 19.3-29.5%), whereas in 17.1% (95% CI 6.3-27.9%) of cases, the SSV terminated in the PV with no cranial extension present. The knowledge of the saphenopopliteal junction and its variations prevalence can help clinicians to quickly identify the real type of the junction during routine examination. In mid-European population, the main type is A1 and worldwide type A.
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 12
- $a vena poplitea $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D011152
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 12
- $a vena saphena $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012501
- 650 _2
- $a duplexní dopplerovská ultrasonografie $7 D018616
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Beneš, Michal $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dostálová, Gabriela $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348091274 $7 xx0062947
- 700 1_
- $a Aleš Linhart, $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kachlík, David $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000357 $t Angiology $x 1940-1574 $g Roč. 75, č. 6 (2024), s. 527-535
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36924269 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133305 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143322 $s 1225292
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 75 $c 6 $d 527-535 $e 20230316 $i 1940-1574 $m Angiology $n Angiology $x MED00000357
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725