Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Variations of the Saphenopopliteal Junction: An Ultrasonography Study in a Young Population, A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis

M. Veselá, M. Beneš, G. Dostálová, . Aleš Linhart, D. Kachlík

. 2024 ; 75 (6) : 527-535. [pub] 20230316

Language English Country United States

Document type Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Journal Article, Review

Saphenopopliteal junction classification has been developing, but still the precise knowledge of junction type is crucial for proper surgical treatment. We examined the saphenopopliteal junction by duplex venous scanning in 244 extremities in healthy volunteers (median age: 23.0 years, 83 females, 39 male) and performed a meta-analysis of 13 studies focusing on structural types of the junction. According to Schweighoffer's classification we distinguished 5 types of the junction and we subdivided type A according to Cavezzi's classification of gastrocnemial veins termination into two. We added type F (small saphenous vein-SSV terminates into popliteal vein-PV), described especially in cadaveric studies. In our study, the most frequent type was A1 (96 cases), followed by C (70), B (48), A2 (20), E (6), D (3) and F (0). The pooled prevalence estimate for types A + B + D + E was 54.7% (95% CI 40.9-69.6%) and for type C 24.4% (95% CI 19.3-29.5%), whereas in 17.1% (95% CI 6.3-27.9%) of cases, the SSV terminated in the PV with no cranial extension present. The knowledge of the saphenopopliteal junction and its variations prevalence can help clinicians to quickly identify the real type of the junction during routine examination. In mid-European population, the main type is A1 and worldwide type A.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013426
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905133311.0
007      
ta
008      
240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/00033197231164433 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36924269
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Veselá, Michaela $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000237826215
245    10
$a Variations of the Saphenopopliteal Junction: An Ultrasonography Study in a Young Population, A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis / $c M. Veselá, M. Beneš, G. Dostálová, . Aleš Linhart, D. Kachlík
520    9_
$a Saphenopopliteal junction classification has been developing, but still the precise knowledge of junction type is crucial for proper surgical treatment. We examined the saphenopopliteal junction by duplex venous scanning in 244 extremities in healthy volunteers (median age: 23.0 years, 83 females, 39 male) and performed a meta-analysis of 13 studies focusing on structural types of the junction. According to Schweighoffer's classification we distinguished 5 types of the junction and we subdivided type A according to Cavezzi's classification of gastrocnemial veins termination into two. We added type F (small saphenous vein-SSV terminates into popliteal vein-PV), described especially in cadaveric studies. In our study, the most frequent type was A1 (96 cases), followed by C (70), B (48), A2 (20), E (6), D (3) and F (0). The pooled prevalence estimate for types A + B + D + E was 54.7% (95% CI 40.9-69.6%) and for type C 24.4% (95% CI 19.3-29.5%), whereas in 17.1% (95% CI 6.3-27.9%) of cases, the SSV terminated in the PV with no cranial extension present. The knowledge of the saphenopopliteal junction and its variations prevalence can help clinicians to quickly identify the real type of the junction during routine examination. In mid-European population, the main type is A1 and worldwide type A.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    12
$a vena poplitea $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D011152
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    12
$a vena saphena $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012501
650    _2
$a duplexní dopplerovská ultrasonografie $7 D018616
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Beneš, Michal $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dostálová, Gabriela $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348091274 $7 xx0062947
700    1_
$a Aleš Linhart, $u Department of Internal. Cardiovascular Medicine,. General University Hospital in Prague,. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kachlík, David $u Department of Anatomy, Charles University Second Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00000357 $t Angiology $x 1940-1574 $g Roč. 75, č. 6 (2024), s. 527-535
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36924269 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905133305 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143322 $s 1225292
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 75 $c 6 $d 527-535 $e 20230316 $i 1940-1574 $m Angiology $n Angiology $x MED00000357
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...