• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Blind deconvolution decreases requirements on temporal resolution of DCE-MRI: Application to 2nd generation pharmacokinetic modeling

J. Kratochvíla, R. Jiřík, M. Bartoš, M. Standara, Z. Starčuk, T. Taxt

. 2024 ; 109 (-) : 238-248. [pub] 20240319

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24013743

PURPOSE: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI with 2nd generation pharmacokinetic models provides estimates of plasma flow and permeability surface-area product in contrast to the broadly used 1st generation models (e.g. the Tofts models). However, the use of 2nd generation models requires higher frequency with which the dynamic images are acquired (around 1.5 s per image). Blind deconvolution can decrease the demands on temporal resolution as shown previously for one of the 1st generation models. Here, the temporal-resolution requirements achievable for blind deconvolution with a 2nd generation model are studied. METHODS: The 2nd generation model is formulated as the distributed-capillary adiabatic-tissue-homogeneity (DCATH) model. Blind deconvolution is based on Parker's model of the arterial input function. The accuracy and precision of the estimated arterial input functions and the perfusion parameters is evaluated on synthetic and real clinical datasets with different levels of the temporal resolution. RESULTS: The estimated arterial input functions remained unchanged from their reference high-temporal-resolution estimates (obtained with the sampling interval around 1 s) when increasing the sampling interval up to about 5 s for synthetic data and up to 3.6-4.8 s for real data. Further increasing of the sampling intervals led to systematic distortions, such as lowering and broadening of the 1st pass peak. The resulting perfusion-parameter estimation error was below 10% for the sampling intervals up to 3 s (synthetic data), in line with the real data perfusion-parameter boxplots which remained unchanged up to the sampling interval 3.6 s. CONCLUSION: We show that use of blind deconvolution decreases the demands on temporal resolution in DCE-MRI from about 1.5 s (in case of measured arterial input functions) to 3-4 s. This can be exploited in increased spatial resolution or larger organ coverage.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013743
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905133512.0
007      
ta
008      
240725e20240319ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38508292
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kratochvíla, Jiří $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kratochvila@isibrno.cz
245    10
$a Blind deconvolution decreases requirements on temporal resolution of DCE-MRI: Application to 2nd generation pharmacokinetic modeling / $c J. Kratochvíla, R. Jiřík, M. Bartoš, M. Standara, Z. Starčuk, T. Taxt
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI with 2nd generation pharmacokinetic models provides estimates of plasma flow and permeability surface-area product in contrast to the broadly used 1st generation models (e.g. the Tofts models). However, the use of 2nd generation models requires higher frequency with which the dynamic images are acquired (around 1.5 s per image). Blind deconvolution can decrease the demands on temporal resolution as shown previously for one of the 1st generation models. Here, the temporal-resolution requirements achievable for blind deconvolution with a 2nd generation model are studied. METHODS: The 2nd generation model is formulated as the distributed-capillary adiabatic-tissue-homogeneity (DCATH) model. Blind deconvolution is based on Parker's model of the arterial input function. The accuracy and precision of the estimated arterial input functions and the perfusion parameters is evaluated on synthetic and real clinical datasets with different levels of the temporal resolution. RESULTS: The estimated arterial input functions remained unchanged from their reference high-temporal-resolution estimates (obtained with the sampling interval around 1 s) when increasing the sampling interval up to about 5 s for synthetic data and up to 3.6-4.8 s for real data. Further increasing of the sampling intervals led to systematic distortions, such as lowering and broadening of the 1st pass peak. The resulting perfusion-parameter estimation error was below 10% for the sampling intervals up to 3 s (synthetic data), in line with the real data perfusion-parameter boxplots which remained unchanged up to the sampling interval 3.6 s. CONCLUSION: We show that use of blind deconvolution decreases the demands on temporal resolution in DCE-MRI from about 1.5 s (in case of measured arterial input functions) to 3-4 s. This can be exploited in increased spatial resolution or larger organ coverage.
650    12
$a kontrastní látky $x farmakokinetika $7 D003287
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a perfuze $7 D010477
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jiřík, Radovan $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Michal $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Technology and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, 182 08 Praha 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Standara, Michal $u Department of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Starčuk, Zenon $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Taxt, Torfinn $u Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, Bergen, Norway
773    0_
$w MED00003171 $t Magnetic resonance imaging $x 1873-5894 $g Roč. 109 (20240319), s. 238-248
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38508292 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905133506 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143507 $s 1225609
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 109 $c - $d 238-248 $e 20240319 $i 1873-5894 $m Magnetic resonance imaging $n Magn Reson Imaging $x MED00003171
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...