-
Something wrong with this record ?
Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
G. Raba, A. Durkech, T. Malík, D. Bassfeld, P. Grob, A. Hurtado-Chong, Fluomizin Study Group
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study, Clinical Trial, Phase IV
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2018
ProQuest Central
from 2018-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2018-01-01
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Administration, Intravaginal MeSH
- Administration, Oral MeSH
- Vaginosis, Bacterial * drug therapy MeSH
- Dequalinium * therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Metronidazole * therapeutic use MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase IV MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
IMPORTANCE: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. RESULTS: A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.
Gynedur s r o Dubnica nad Váhom Slovakia
Gyneko spol s r o Vsetin Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014058
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134350.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8661 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38696172
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Raba, Grzegorz $u Prywatny Gabinet Gynekologiczno, Zurawica, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial / $c G. Raba, A. Durkech, T. Malík, D. Bassfeld, P. Grob, A. Hurtado-Chong, Fluomizin Study Group
- 520 9_
- $a IMPORTANCE: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. RESULTS: A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a metronidazol $x terapeutické užití $7 D008795
- 650 12
- $a bakteriální vaginóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D016585
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a dechalinium $x terapeutické užití $7 D003868
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace intravaginální $7 D000282
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace orální $7 D000284
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze IV $7 D017429
- 700 1_
- $a Durkech, Anton $u Gynedur s.r.o., Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Malík, Tomáš $u Gyneko spol. s.r.o., Vsetin, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bassfeld, Doerthe $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Grob, Philipp $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Hurtado-Chong, Anahí $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 710 2_
- $a Fluomizin Study Group
- 773 0_
- $w MED00205674 $t JAMA network open $x 2574-3805 $g Roč. 7, č. 5 (2024), s. e248661
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38696172 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134344 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143689 $s 1225924
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 7 $c 5 $d e248661 $e 20240501 $i 2574-3805 $m JAMA network open $n JAMA Netw Open $x MED00205674
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725