-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
G. Raba, A. Durkech, T. Malík, D. Bassfeld, P. Grob, A. Hurtado-Chong, Fluomizin Study Group
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem, multicentrická studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze IV
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2018
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2018
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- aplikace intravaginální MeSH
- aplikace orální MeSH
- bakteriální vaginóza * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dechalinium * terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metronidazol * terapeutické užití MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze IV MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
IMPORTANCE: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. RESULTS: A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.
Gynedur s r o Dubnica nad Váhom Slovakia
Gyneko spol s r o Vsetin Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014058
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134350.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8661 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38696172
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Raba, Grzegorz $u Prywatny Gabinet Gynekologiczno, Zurawica, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial / $c G. Raba, A. Durkech, T. Malík, D. Bassfeld, P. Grob, A. Hurtado-Chong, Fluomizin Study Group
- 520 9_
- $a IMPORTANCE: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. RESULTS: A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a metronidazol $x terapeutické užití $7 D008795
- 650 12
- $a bakteriální vaginóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D016585
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a dechalinium $x terapeutické užití $7 D003868
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace intravaginální $7 D000282
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace orální $7 D000284
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze IV $7 D017429
- 700 1_
- $a Durkech, Anton $u Gynedur s.r.o., Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Malík, Tomáš $u Gyneko spol. s.r.o., Vsetin, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bassfeld, Doerthe $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Grob, Philipp $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Hurtado-Chong, Anahí $u Medinova AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- 710 2_
- $a Fluomizin Study Group
- 773 0_
- $w MED00205674 $t JAMA network open $x 2574-3805 $g Roč. 7, č. 5 (2024), s. e248661
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38696172 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134344 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143689 $s 1225924
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 7 $c 5 $d e248661 $e 20240501 $i 2574-3805 $m JAMA network open $n JAMA Netw Open $x MED00205674
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725