• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The Impact of Coracoid Tip Orientation on Subscapularis Tear Incidence: an MRI-Based Study [Vliv orientace hrotu korakoidu na výskyt trhlin šlachy m. subscapularis: studie založená na MRI]

H. Yaka, M. Özer, B. Sarikaya, U. Kanatli

. 2024 ; 91 (4) : 239-244. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24017542

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study investigated the relationship between the position of the tip of the coracoid process (CP) relative to the glenoid with subscapularis (Ssc) tears. We hypothesized that the coracoid tip is more inferior, lateral and posterior in patients with Ssc tear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This research enrolled 34 isolated Ssc tears and 44 controls. We introduced the axial central glenoid-coracoid angle (acGCA) and sagittal central glenoid-coracoid angle (scGCA) to evaluate the position of the tip of the CP relative to the glenoid center on MRI images. In both groups, acGCA, scGCA on MRI and critical shoulder angle (CSA), glenoid inclination (GI) on true anterior-posterior shoulder radiography were evaluated. RESULTS: When both groups were compared in terms of acGCA, the acGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of acGCA for Ssc tears was 28.3°. acGCA values higher than 28.3° showed 93.3% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio:13.53, AUC: 0.979, 95% CI of AUC: 0.950- 0.999). In terms of acGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tears group and control group was 99.9% between Ssc tears and the control group (effect size d=2.63). When both groups were compared in terms of scGCA, the scGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of scGCA for Ssc tears was 41.4°. Scores of scGCA greater than 41.8° showed 80% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio: 7.73, AUC: 0.899 95% CI of AUC: 0.837-0.958). In terms of scGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tear and control group was 99.8% (effect size d=1.23). When both groups were compared in terms of CSA and GI; CSA and GI values in the Ssc tear group were significantly higher (p<0.001 and p<0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AcGCA values higher than 28.3° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more laterally and posteriorly; scGCA values higher than 41.8° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more inferiorly and these two new indexes are showing that more laterally, posteriorly and inferiorly coracoid tip is related to subscapularis tears. KEY WORDS: coracoid process, subscapularis tear, coracoid morphology, scapula morphology.

Vliv orientace hrotu korakoidu na výskyt trhlin šlachy m. subscapularis: studie založená na MRI

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24017542
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250402155225.0
007      
ta
008      
241004s2024 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/032 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39342646
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Yaka, H. $u Necmettin Erbakan University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Konya, Turkey
245    14
$a The Impact of Coracoid Tip Orientation on Subscapularis Tear Incidence: an MRI-Based Study / $c H. Yaka, M. Özer, B. Sarikaya, U. Kanatli
246    31
$a Vliv orientace hrotu korakoidu na výskyt trhlin šlachy m. subscapularis: studie založená na MRI
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study investigated the relationship between the position of the tip of the coracoid process (CP) relative to the glenoid with subscapularis (Ssc) tears. We hypothesized that the coracoid tip is more inferior, lateral and posterior in patients with Ssc tear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This research enrolled 34 isolated Ssc tears and 44 controls. We introduced the axial central glenoid-coracoid angle (acGCA) and sagittal central glenoid-coracoid angle (scGCA) to evaluate the position of the tip of the CP relative to the glenoid center on MRI images. In both groups, acGCA, scGCA on MRI and critical shoulder angle (CSA), glenoid inclination (GI) on true anterior-posterior shoulder radiography were evaluated. RESULTS: When both groups were compared in terms of acGCA, the acGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of acGCA for Ssc tears was 28.3°. acGCA values higher than 28.3° showed 93.3% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio:13.53, AUC: 0.979, 95% CI of AUC: 0.950- 0.999). In terms of acGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tears group and control group was 99.9% between Ssc tears and the control group (effect size d=2.63). When both groups were compared in terms of scGCA, the scGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of scGCA for Ssc tears was 41.4°. Scores of scGCA greater than 41.8° showed 80% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio: 7.73, AUC: 0.899 95% CI of AUC: 0.837-0.958). In terms of scGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tear and control group was 99.8% (effect size d=1.23). When both groups were compared in terms of CSA and GI; CSA and GI values in the Ssc tear group were significantly higher (p<0.001 and p<0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AcGCA values higher than 28.3° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more laterally and posteriorly; scGCA values higher than 41.8° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more inferiorly and these two new indexes are showing that more laterally, posteriorly and inferiorly coracoid tip is related to subscapularis tears. KEY WORDS: coracoid process, subscapularis tear, coracoid morphology, scapula morphology.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a poranění rotátorové manžety $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D000070636
650    12
$a processus coracoideus $x zranění $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D000070597
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ramenní kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012785
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Özer, M. $u Necmettin Erbakan University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Konya, Turkey
700    1_
$a Sarikaya, B. $u Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey
700    1_
$a Kanatli, U. $u Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 4 (2024), s. 239-244
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39342646 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241004 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250402155221 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2294538 $s 1229492
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 91 $c 4 $d 239-244 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK124 $a Pubmed-20241004

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace