-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A Comparison of Paddle Forces between Whitewater and Flatwater Training in C1 Canoe Slalom
JM. Wakeling, S. Smiešková, M. Vajda, J. Busta
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
7015-2020
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2016
PubMed Central
od 2018
ProQuest Central
od 2021-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2021-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2021-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2016
PubMed
39311275
DOI
10.3390/jfmk9030167
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Becoming an elite canoe slalom athlete requires thousands of hours of training, spread over many years. It is difficult to assess the correct balance between flatwater and whitewater training because differences in the paddle forces on these terrains are not known. The aim of this study was to describe paddle forces during canoe slalom training on flatwater and whitewater courses for the C1 canoe category. METHODS: Paddle forces for twenty C1 canoe slalom athletes were quantified during all-out figure-of-eight tests on a flatwater course and during race simulations on a whitewater course. Paddle forces were measured using strain gauges embedded in the paddle shaft and quantified by their force, impulse, and stroke durations. RESULTS: The mean force during the pull phase of the paddle strokes was not significantly different between the flatwater and whitewater courses; however, the longer pull phase durations led to a greater pull phase impulse when paddling on the whitewater course. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that training for all-out runs on a whitewater course is more demanding for canoe slalom athletes than performing all-out trials on a flatwater figure-of-eight course. This evidence may help to develop effective training plans that are essential to reach the highest levels of the sport.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24017793
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241016081901.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241008s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jfmk9030167 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39311275
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Wakeling, James M $u Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308170867
- 245 12
- $a A Comparison of Paddle Forces between Whitewater and Flatwater Training in C1 Canoe Slalom / $c JM. Wakeling, S. Smiešková, M. Vajda, J. Busta
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Becoming an elite canoe slalom athlete requires thousands of hours of training, spread over many years. It is difficult to assess the correct balance between flatwater and whitewater training because differences in the paddle forces on these terrains are not known. The aim of this study was to describe paddle forces during canoe slalom training on flatwater and whitewater courses for the C1 canoe category. METHODS: Paddle forces for twenty C1 canoe slalom athletes were quantified during all-out figure-of-eight tests on a flatwater course and during race simulations on a whitewater course. Paddle forces were measured using strain gauges embedded in the paddle shaft and quantified by their force, impulse, and stroke durations. RESULTS: The mean force during the pull phase of the paddle strokes was not significantly different between the flatwater and whitewater courses; however, the longer pull phase durations led to a greater pull phase impulse when paddling on the whitewater course. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that training for all-out runs on a whitewater course is more demanding for canoe slalom athletes than performing all-out trials on a flatwater figure-of-eight course. This evidence may help to develop effective training plans that are essential to reach the highest levels of the sport.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Smiešková, Stanislava $u Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Vajda, Matej $u Hamar Institute for Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Comenius University, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000214718465
- 700 1_
- $a Busta, Jan $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00209369 $t Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology $x 2411-5142 $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39311275 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241016081857 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2196374 $s 1229744
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 9 $c 3 $e 20240917 $i 2411-5142 $m Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology $n J Funct Morphol Kinesiol $x MED00209369
- GRA __
- $a 7015-2020 $p Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241008