Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Omission of staging PET/CT linked to reduced survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: insights from the LUCAS project real-world data

G. Krakorova, P. Domecky, J. Blazek, M. Pesek, O. Venclicek, L. Havel, M. Hrnciarik, J. Krejci, A. Mullerova, M. Marel, J. Duba, M. Svaton

. 2024 ; 13 (7) : 1495-1504. [pub] 20240715

Status not-indexed Language English Country China

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly heterogeneous stage due to its subgroups (IIIA-IIIC) comprising both resectable and unresectable tumors. Accurate determination of the extent of the disease is essential for excluding stage IV and choosing the optimal treatment regimen. Whole body positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan (PET/CT) is recommended as an initial staging imaging in locally advanced NSCLC. Despite international guidelines for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment, they are not always adhered to due to various reasons. Even in such a groundbreaking study, the phase 3 trial PACIFIC investigating the efficacy of durvalumab as consolidation therapy in patients with stage III NSCLC PET/CT was not mandatory. With the premise that whole body PET/CT of the trunk is essential for diagnosing stage III NSCLC, we performed a retrospective study evaluating the relationship of the use of PET/CT versus conventional staging with CT of the chest and abdomen, in terms of survival. METHODS: This retrospective study of stage III NSCLC patients used the Czech lung cancer registry LUCAS, which was established in June 2018. As of the data export (up to February 9, 2022), a total of 703 patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model. Continuous variables were tested using the Mann-Whitney test, and categorical variables using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 703 patients were included in the cohort with an average age of 69 years. PET/CT was performed on 354 patients, and conventional staging using chest and abdominal CT on 349 patients. The median OS among patients with PET/CT was 20.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1-23.7], and it was statistically significantly higher (P<0.001) than among patients without PET/CT, where the median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.3-10.6). The observed effect of PET/CT was also statistically significant when comparing individual stages (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC). The multivariate Cox model confirmed the use of PET/CT as an independent prognostic factor. The most common reason for omission of PET/CT was the local or time unavailability of the examination. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of PET/CT can mean a significant decrement in survival for the patients in stage III NSCLC, likely due to poor staging and suboptimal treatment. Routine use of PET/CT is strictly recommended for the optimal management of stage III NSCLC patients even outside the high-income countries.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018131
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241016081801.0
007      
ta
008      
241008s2024 cc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21037/tlcr-24-108 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39118875
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a cc
100    1_
$a Krakorova, Gabriela $u Department of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000191871247 $7 xx0028860
245    10
$a Omission of staging PET/CT linked to reduced survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: insights from the LUCAS project real-world data / $c G. Krakorova, P. Domecky, J. Blazek, M. Pesek, O. Venclicek, L. Havel, M. Hrnciarik, J. Krejci, A. Mullerova, M. Marel, J. Duba, M. Svaton
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly heterogeneous stage due to its subgroups (IIIA-IIIC) comprising both resectable and unresectable tumors. Accurate determination of the extent of the disease is essential for excluding stage IV and choosing the optimal treatment regimen. Whole body positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan (PET/CT) is recommended as an initial staging imaging in locally advanced NSCLC. Despite international guidelines for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment, they are not always adhered to due to various reasons. Even in such a groundbreaking study, the phase 3 trial PACIFIC investigating the efficacy of durvalumab as consolidation therapy in patients with stage III NSCLC PET/CT was not mandatory. With the premise that whole body PET/CT of the trunk is essential for diagnosing stage III NSCLC, we performed a retrospective study evaluating the relationship of the use of PET/CT versus conventional staging with CT of the chest and abdomen, in terms of survival. METHODS: This retrospective study of stage III NSCLC patients used the Czech lung cancer registry LUCAS, which was established in June 2018. As of the data export (up to February 9, 2022), a total of 703 patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model. Continuous variables were tested using the Mann-Whitney test, and categorical variables using the Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 703 patients were included in the cohort with an average age of 69 years. PET/CT was performed on 354 patients, and conventional staging using chest and abdominal CT on 349 patients. The median OS among patients with PET/CT was 20.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1-23.7], and it was statistically significantly higher (P<0.001) than among patients without PET/CT, where the median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.3-10.6). The observed effect of PET/CT was also statistically significant when comparing individual stages (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC). The multivariate Cox model confirmed the use of PET/CT as an independent prognostic factor. The most common reason for omission of PET/CT was the local or time unavailability of the examination. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of PET/CT can mean a significant decrement in survival for the patients in stage III NSCLC, likely due to poor staging and suboptimal treatment. Routine use of PET/CT is strictly recommended for the optimal management of stage III NSCLC patients even outside the high-income countries.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Domecky, Petr $u OAKS Consulting s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000205668080
700    1_
$a Blazek, Jiri $u Department of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000021867798X
700    1_
$a Pesek, Milos $u Department of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246647614 $7 jn20021014008
700    1_
$a Venclicek, Ondrej $u Department of Respiratory Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000291994869
700    1_
$a Havel, Libor $u Department of Respiratory Medicine, Thomayer Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hrnciarik, Michal $u Pulmonary Department, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000664111369
700    1_
$a Krejci, Jana $u Department of Pneumology, Bulovka Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000025526867
700    1_
$a Mullerova, Andrea $u Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000019478160X
700    1_
$a Marel, Miloslav $u Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Motol, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000302596226 $7 nlk19990073527
700    1_
$a Duba, Jaroslav $u OAKS Consulting s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000251672478
700    1_
$a Svaton, Martin $u Department of Pneumology and Phthisiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268218677 $7 xx0224192
773    0_
$w MED00186389 $t Translational lung cancer research $x 2218-6751 $g Roč. 13, č. 7 (2024), s. 1495-1504
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39118875 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241016081757 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2196469 $s 1230082
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 13 $c 7 $d 1495-1504 $e 20240715 $i 2218-6751 $m Translational lung cancer research $n Transl Lung Cancer Res $x MED00186389
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...