• Something wrong with this record ?

Ventilation efficacy during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (PEDIVENT): simulation-based comparative study

T. Skrisovska, J. Djakow, P. Jabandziev, T. Kramplova, J. Klucka, M. Kosinova, P. Stourac

. 2024 ; 11 (-) : 1400948. [pub] 20240513

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: This simulation-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ventilation during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and lay rescuers (LRs). The objective was to assess the number of effective breaths delivered during the initial sequence of CPR. Effective ventilation plays a critical role during paediatric CPR as most cardiac arrests are secondary to hypoxia in origin. The recommendations on initial resuscitation in unresponsive, non-breathing children differ worldwide. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines recommend five breaths before starting the chest compressions. Yet, this recommendation was based on the expert consensus historically and has not changed since 2000 because of the lack of evidence. This research addresses the identified knowledge gap, with potential implications for improving resuscitation practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. METHODS: HCPs and LRs performed 90 s of CPR involving two mannequins: 5-kg Baby and 20-kg Junior. Both groups (HCPs and LRs) performed the task before and after structured CPR training, and the efficacy of ventilation before and after the training was compared. The HCPs provided bag-mask ventilation; LR performed dispatcher-assisted CPR with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. RESULTS: The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in Baby was 26 (65%) vs. 40 (100%) in HCPs and 28 (60.9%) vs. 45 (97.8%) in LRs (improvement in both p < 0.001), respectively. The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in the Junior mannequin was 31 (77.5%) vs. 32 (82.1%) in HCPs (p = 0.77) and 32 (82.1%) vs. 37 (94.9%) in LRs (p = 0.005), respectively. DISCUSSION: This simulation-based study is the first to investigate ventilation efficacy during paediatric CPR provided by HCPs and LRs. Ventilation represents an important aspect of good-quality CPR in children. The concept of initiating paediatric CPR with initial breaths, as stated in ERC guidelines 2021, is justifiable. Trained HCPs and LRs providing dispatcher-assisted CPR could deliver effective ventilation to paediatric mannequins. These findings can contribute to future research in this area and address identified knowledge gaps concerning resuscitation guidelines, given the unique practical application of simulation as a research tool.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018369
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241016081916.0
007      
ta
008      
241008e20240513sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fmed.2024.1400948 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39175823
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Skrisovska, Tamara $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
245    10
$a Ventilation efficacy during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (PEDIVENT): simulation-based comparative study / $c T. Skrisovska, J. Djakow, P. Jabandziev, T. Kramplova, J. Klucka, M. Kosinova, P. Stourac
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: This simulation-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ventilation during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and lay rescuers (LRs). The objective was to assess the number of effective breaths delivered during the initial sequence of CPR. Effective ventilation plays a critical role during paediatric CPR as most cardiac arrests are secondary to hypoxia in origin. The recommendations on initial resuscitation in unresponsive, non-breathing children differ worldwide. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines recommend five breaths before starting the chest compressions. Yet, this recommendation was based on the expert consensus historically and has not changed since 2000 because of the lack of evidence. This research addresses the identified knowledge gap, with potential implications for improving resuscitation practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. METHODS: HCPs and LRs performed 90 s of CPR involving two mannequins: 5-kg Baby and 20-kg Junior. Both groups (HCPs and LRs) performed the task before and after structured CPR training, and the efficacy of ventilation before and after the training was compared. The HCPs provided bag-mask ventilation; LR performed dispatcher-assisted CPR with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. RESULTS: The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in Baby was 26 (65%) vs. 40 (100%) in HCPs and 28 (60.9%) vs. 45 (97.8%) in LRs (improvement in both p < 0.001), respectively. The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in the Junior mannequin was 31 (77.5%) vs. 32 (82.1%) in HCPs (p = 0.77) and 32 (82.1%) vs. 37 (94.9%) in LRs (p = 0.005), respectively. DISCUSSION: This simulation-based study is the first to investigate ventilation efficacy during paediatric CPR provided by HCPs and LRs. Ventilation represents an important aspect of good-quality CPR in children. The concept of initiating paediatric CPR with initial breaths, as stated in ERC guidelines 2021, is justifiable. Trained HCPs and LRs providing dispatcher-assisted CPR could deliver effective ventilation to paediatric mannequins. These findings can contribute to future research in this area and address identified knowledge gaps concerning resuscitation guidelines, given the unique practical application of simulation as a research tool.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Djakow, Jana $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, NH Hospital Inc., Hořovice, Czechia
700    1_
$a Jabandziev, Petr $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kramplova, Tereza $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Klucka, Jozef $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kosinova, Martina $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Stourac, Petr $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00188756 $t Frontiers in medicine $x 2296-858X $g Roč. 11 (20240513), s. 1400948
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39175823 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241016081911 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2196542 $s 1230322
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 11 $c - $d 1400948 $e 20240513 $i 2296-858X $m Frontiers in medicine $n Front Med (Lausanne) $x MED00188756
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...