Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sonographic measurement of deep fascia parameters - Interrater reliability

T. Štěpánková, A. Quittková, Z. Čech, S. Machač

. 2024 ; 46 (9) : 1481-1489. [pub] 20240717

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019103

Grantová podpora
211123 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom

PURPOSE: The deep fascia has recently been a current topic in many medical fields, including rehabilitation. Some research has already focused on assessing deep fascia, however results of individual authors differ in certain aspects. This study focuses on the inter-rater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurement of the thickness of deep fascia and loose connective tissue (LCT). The aim was to define the causes of any discrepancies in measurement that could contribute to the unification of management of evaluating fascia. METHODS: An observational study was performed including 20 healthy individuals in whom fascia lata of the anterior thigh was examined by US imaging and then measured in Image J software. Three raters participated in this study: the first with 6 years of US imaging experience, other two were newly trained. The measurement of fascial parameters was conducted in two phases with special consultation between them resulting in an agreement of the research team on the more precise way of measurement. RESULTS: Results revealed the value of inter-rater reliability ICC3,1 = 0.454 for deep fascia thickness and ICC3,1 = 0.265 for LCT thickness in the first phase and any significant difference in the second phase. This poor inter-rater reliability led to a search for possible causes of discrepancies, which authors subsequently highlighted. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study show the main pitfalls of deep fascia measurement that should contribute to the unification of evaluation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019103
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251014121340.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00276-024-03423-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39014213
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Štěpánková, Tereza $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. teri.stepankova@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0009000393744569
245    10
$a Sonographic measurement of deep fascia parameters - Interrater reliability / $c T. Štěpánková, A. Quittková, Z. Čech, S. Machač
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The deep fascia has recently been a current topic in many medical fields, including rehabilitation. Some research has already focused on assessing deep fascia, however results of individual authors differ in certain aspects. This study focuses on the inter-rater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurement of the thickness of deep fascia and loose connective tissue (LCT). The aim was to define the causes of any discrepancies in measurement that could contribute to the unification of management of evaluating fascia. METHODS: An observational study was performed including 20 healthy individuals in whom fascia lata of the anterior thigh was examined by US imaging and then measured in Image J software. Three raters participated in this study: the first with 6 years of US imaging experience, other two were newly trained. The measurement of fascial parameters was conducted in two phases with special consultation between them resulting in an agreement of the research team on the more precise way of measurement. RESULTS: Results revealed the value of inter-rater reliability ICC3,1 = 0.454 for deep fascia thickness and ICC3,1 = 0.265 for LCT thickness in the first phase and any significant difference in the second phase. This poor inter-rater reliability led to a search for possible causes of discrepancies, which authors subsequently highlighted. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study show the main pitfalls of deep fascia measurement that should contribute to the unification of evaluation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
650    _2
$a fascia lata $x diagnostické zobrazování $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005206
650    _2
$a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
650    _2
$a fascie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005205
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a stehno $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Quittková, Adéla $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000618745096 $7 xx0336951
700    1_
$a Čech, Zdeněk $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900066319588X
700    1_
$a Machač, Stanislav $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000971313331
773    0_
$w MED00004462 $t Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA $x 1279-8517 $g Roč. 46, č. 9 (2024), s. 1481-1489
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39014213 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251014121347 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201744 $s 1231076
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 46 $c 9 $d 1481-1489 $e 20240717 $i 1279-8517 $m Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA $n Surg Radiol Anat $x MED00004462
GRA    __
$a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...