-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Sonographic measurement of deep fascia parameters - Interrater reliability
T. Štěpánková, A. Quittková, Z. Čech, S. Machač
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie
Grantová podpora
211123
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
211123
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fascia lata diagnostické zobrazování anatomie a histologie MeSH
- fascie diagnostické zobrazování anatomie a histologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- odchylka pozorovatele * MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- stehno diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- ultrasonografie * metody MeSH
- zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: The deep fascia has recently been a current topic in many medical fields, including rehabilitation. Some research has already focused on assessing deep fascia, however results of individual authors differ in certain aspects. This study focuses on the inter-rater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurement of the thickness of deep fascia and loose connective tissue (LCT). The aim was to define the causes of any discrepancies in measurement that could contribute to the unification of management of evaluating fascia. METHODS: An observational study was performed including 20 healthy individuals in whom fascia lata of the anterior thigh was examined by US imaging and then measured in Image J software. Three raters participated in this study: the first with 6 years of US imaging experience, other two were newly trained. The measurement of fascial parameters was conducted in two phases with special consultation between them resulting in an agreement of the research team on the more precise way of measurement. RESULTS: Results revealed the value of inter-rater reliability ICC3,1 = 0.454 for deep fascia thickness and ICC3,1 = 0.265 for LCT thickness in the first phase and any significant difference in the second phase. This poor inter-rater reliability led to a search for possible causes of discrepancies, which authors subsequently highlighted. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study show the main pitfalls of deep fascia measurement that should contribute to the unification of evaluation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019103
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20251014121340.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00276-024-03423-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39014213
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Štěpánková, Tereza $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. teri.stepankova@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0009000393744569
- 245 10
- $a Sonographic measurement of deep fascia parameters - Interrater reliability / $c T. Štěpánková, A. Quittková, Z. Čech, S. Machač
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The deep fascia has recently been a current topic in many medical fields, including rehabilitation. Some research has already focused on assessing deep fascia, however results of individual authors differ in certain aspects. This study focuses on the inter-rater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurement of the thickness of deep fascia and loose connective tissue (LCT). The aim was to define the causes of any discrepancies in measurement that could contribute to the unification of management of evaluating fascia. METHODS: An observational study was performed including 20 healthy individuals in whom fascia lata of the anterior thigh was examined by US imaging and then measured in Image J software. Three raters participated in this study: the first with 6 years of US imaging experience, other two were newly trained. The measurement of fascial parameters was conducted in two phases with special consultation between them resulting in an agreement of the research team on the more precise way of measurement. RESULTS: Results revealed the value of inter-rater reliability ICC3,1 = 0.454 for deep fascia thickness and ICC3,1 = 0.265 for LCT thickness in the first phase and any significant difference in the second phase. This poor inter-rater reliability led to a search for possible causes of discrepancies, which authors subsequently highlighted. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study show the main pitfalls of deep fascia measurement that should contribute to the unification of evaluation.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
- 650 _2
- $a fascia lata $x diagnostické zobrazování $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005206
- 650 _2
- $a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
- 650 _2
- $a fascie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005205
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a stehno $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013848
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Quittková, Adéla $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000618745096 $7 xx0336951
- 700 1_
- $a Čech, Zdeněk $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900066319588X
- 700 1_
- $a Machač, Stanislav $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000971313331
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004462 $t Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA $x 1279-8517 $g Roč. 46, č. 9 (2024), s. 1481-1489
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39014213 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20251014121347 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2201744 $s 1231076
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 46 $c 9 $d 1481-1489 $e 20240717 $i 1279-8517 $m Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA $n Surg Radiol Anat $x MED00004462
- GRA __
- $a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- GRA __
- $a 211123 $p Wellcome Trust $2 United Kingdom
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015