-
Something wrong with this record ?
A comparison of patients with epileptic seizures (ES) versus those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) on measures of alexithymia, mood, and anxiety
R. Trobliger, L. Myers, T. Simpson, L. Krámská
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study
- MeSH
- Affect physiology MeSH
- Affective Symptoms * diagnosis etiology MeSH
- Depression diagnosis etiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Epilepsy * psychology complications MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Anxiety * diagnosis etiology MeSH
- Seizures * psychology diagnosis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To compare persons with epilepsy (PWE) to those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) on measures of depression, anxiety, and alexithymia subscales (i.e., difficulty identifying emotions, difficulty describing emotions, and external-oriented thinking). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 235 epilepsy patients and 90 patients with PNES were evaluated between 2012 and 2020 at the Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group. These patients had completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), The Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Background information was collected regarding work/student/disability status at the time of the evaluation history of psychiatric diagnosis; psychological trauma; and involvement in psychotherapy either at the time of the evaluation or prior. RESULTS: Significant differences between PWEs and those with PNES were found not only in historical data (e.g., Psychiatric History, History of Trauma, and History of Therapy) (p < .001) but also on measures of Depression (p = .002) and Anxiety (p < .001). ANOVA analysis also revealed significant differences in the distribution of the TAS-Total score, TAS-Describing emotions, and TAS-Identifying emotions. Using logistic regression (stepwise model) the optimal set of predictors for a differential diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES was combination of TAS-Identifying emotions score, history of psychological trauma, and history of therapy. The accuracy of the prediction was determined to be 80.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Although higher alexithymia rates are present in PNES and PWEs, clinicians may find a combination of TAS-Identifying Emotion score, history of trauma, and history of psychotherapy useful in supporting a differential diagnosis. Also, a subgroup may exist among those with PNES with high levels of alexithymia, depression, and anxiety that may require a different treatment approach focused on addressing difficulties in identifying and describing their emotions and their other symptomatology.
Department of Clinical Psychology Epilepsy Center Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Psychology Faculty of Education Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019517
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110758.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015e20240612enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.06.010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38897162
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Trobliger, Robert $u Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack, NJ, USA. Electronic address: rtrobliger@epilepsygroup.com
- 245 12
- $a A comparison of patients with epileptic seizures (ES) versus those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) on measures of alexithymia, mood, and anxiety / $c R. Trobliger, L. Myers, T. Simpson, L. Krámská
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To compare persons with epilepsy (PWE) to those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) on measures of depression, anxiety, and alexithymia subscales (i.e., difficulty identifying emotions, difficulty describing emotions, and external-oriented thinking). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 235 epilepsy patients and 90 patients with PNES were evaluated between 2012 and 2020 at the Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group. These patients had completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), The Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Background information was collected regarding work/student/disability status at the time of the evaluation history of psychiatric diagnosis; psychological trauma; and involvement in psychotherapy either at the time of the evaluation or prior. RESULTS: Significant differences between PWEs and those with PNES were found not only in historical data (e.g., Psychiatric History, History of Trauma, and History of Therapy) (p < .001) but also on measures of Depression (p = .002) and Anxiety (p < .001). ANOVA analysis also revealed significant differences in the distribution of the TAS-Total score, TAS-Describing emotions, and TAS-Identifying emotions. Using logistic regression (stepwise model) the optimal set of predictors for a differential diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES was combination of TAS-Identifying emotions score, history of psychological trauma, and history of therapy. The accuracy of the prediction was determined to be 80.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Although higher alexithymia rates are present in PNES and PWEs, clinicians may find a combination of TAS-Identifying Emotion score, history of trauma, and history of psychotherapy useful in supporting a differential diagnosis. Also, a subgroup may exist among those with PNES with high levels of alexithymia, depression, and anxiety that may require a different treatment approach focused on addressing difficulties in identifying and describing their emotions and their other symptomatology.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a afektivní symptomy $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D000342
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a úzkost $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D001007
- 650 12
- $a záchvaty $x psychologie $x diagnóza $7 D012640
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a epilepsie $x psychologie $x komplikace $7 D004827
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a afekt $x fyziologie $7 D000339
- 650 _2
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Myers, Lorna $u Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack, NJ, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Simpson, Talia $u Yeshiva University, NY, NY, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Krámská, Lenka $u Department of Clinical Psychology, Epilepsy Center, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004310 $t Seizure $x 1532-2688 $g Roč. 120 (20240612), s. 33-40
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38897162 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110752 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202005 $s 1231490
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 120 $c - $d 33-40 $e 20240612 $i 1532-2688 $m Seizure $n Seizure $x MED00004310
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015