Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Survival and predictive factors of clinical outcome in patients with severe acquired brain injury

T. Tyll, A. Bubeníková, J. Votava, M. Pochop, M. Soták

. 2024 ; 60 (4) : 597-603. [pub] 20240618

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019519

BACKGROUND: Despite the many tools available to modern medicine, predicting the neurological and functional status of patients after severe brain injury remains difficult. AIM: This analysis evaluates the outcomes of patients with the most severe degree of cerebral function impairment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients hospitalized in the long-term Intensive Care Unit (ICU) department in the Military University Hospital in Prague between 2015-2022. POPULATION: We analyzed patients with severe acquired brain damage from five distinct etiologies whose initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was eight or less upon admission to ICU due to neurological damage. METHODS: Several parameters reflecting the patients' clinical status were evaluated. Overall survival after discharge from the ICU was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier model with comparison between traumatic (TR) and non-traumatic (non-TR) etiologies. RESULTS: The analyzed cohort of 221 patients consisted of 116 patients of TR and 105 of non-TR etiology. There was no significant difference in overall survival between TR and non-TR groups. The length of hospitalization in the ICU was similar in both groups with a median of 94 days. The majority of patients had an improvement of GCS during the hospitalization with a median improvement of five points. GCS improvement occurred in the vast majority of patients regardless of TR or non-TR etiology. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistically significant difference in mortality or log-term neurological status between patients with severe brain injury of traumatic or non-traumatic etiology for the duration of our follow-up. The majority of patients had improved GCS, were successfully decannulated, but remained disabled with severe limitations of functional independence. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The return of the patient to normal life is a rehabilitation challenge, regardless of the etiology of brain injury, and is extremely influenced by the level of development of neurorehabilitation programs in individual institutions, the severity of brain injury, and the individual motivation of the patient.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019519
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110757.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08430-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38888736
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Tyll, Tomáš $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Survival and predictive factors of clinical outcome in patients with severe acquired brain injury / $c T. Tyll, A. Bubeníková, J. Votava, M. Pochop, M. Soták
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Despite the many tools available to modern medicine, predicting the neurological and functional status of patients after severe brain injury remains difficult. AIM: This analysis evaluates the outcomes of patients with the most severe degree of cerebral function impairment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients hospitalized in the long-term Intensive Care Unit (ICU) department in the Military University Hospital in Prague between 2015-2022. POPULATION: We analyzed patients with severe acquired brain damage from five distinct etiologies whose initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was eight or less upon admission to ICU due to neurological damage. METHODS: Several parameters reflecting the patients' clinical status were evaluated. Overall survival after discharge from the ICU was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier model with comparison between traumatic (TR) and non-traumatic (non-TR) etiologies. RESULTS: The analyzed cohort of 221 patients consisted of 116 patients of TR and 105 of non-TR etiology. There was no significant difference in overall survival between TR and non-TR groups. The length of hospitalization in the ICU was similar in both groups with a median of 94 days. The majority of patients had an improvement of GCS during the hospitalization with a median improvement of five points. GCS improvement occurred in the vast majority of patients regardless of TR or non-TR etiology. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistically significant difference in mortality or log-term neurological status between patients with severe brain injury of traumatic or non-traumatic etiology for the duration of our follow-up. The majority of patients had improved GCS, were successfully decannulated, but remained disabled with severe limitations of functional independence. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The return of the patient to normal life is a rehabilitation challenge, regardless of the etiology of brain injury, and is extremely influenced by the level of development of neurorehabilitation programs in individual institutions, the severity of brain injury, and the individual motivation of the patient.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a poranění mozku $x rehabilitace $7 D001930
650    12
$a Glasgowská stupnice kómat $7 D015600
650    12
$a jednotky intenzivní péče $7 D007362
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bubeníková, Adéla $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Votava, Jan $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pochop, Martin $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Soták, Michal $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital of Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - michal.sotak@uvn.cz
773    0_
$w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 60, č. 4 (2024), s. 597-603
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38888736 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110751 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202007 $s 1231492
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 60 $c 4 $d 597-603 $e 20240618 $i 1973-9095 $m European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $n Eur J Phys Rehabil Med $x MED00174347
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...