-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The relevance of biologically effective dose for pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: an 871-patient multicenter study
RE. Warnick, I. Paddick, D. Mathieu, E. Adam, C. Iorio-Morin, W. Leduc, A. Hamel, SE. Johnson, M. Bydon, A. Niranjan, LD. Lunsford, Z. Wei, K. Waite, S. Jose, S. Peker, MY. Samanci, E. Tek, G. Mantziaris, S. Pikis, JP. Sheehan, M. Tripathi, N....
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření bolesti MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- neuralgie trigeminu * radioterapie chirurgie MeSH
- radiochirurgie * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that biologically effective dose (BED) is an important correlate of pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The goal of this study was to determine if BED is superior to prescription dose in predicting outcomes in TN patients undergoing GKRS as a first procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 871 patients with type 1 TN from 13 GKRS centers. Patient demographics, pain characteristics, treatment parameters, and outcomes were reviewed. BED was compared with prescription dose and other dosimetric factors for their predictive value. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 60% were female. Nearly 70% of patients experienced pain in the V2 and/or V3 dermatomes, predominantly on the right side (60%). Most patients had modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grade IV or V pain (89.2%) and were taking 1 or 2 pain medications (74.1%). The median prescription dose was 80 Gy (range 62.5-95 Gy). The proximal trigeminal nerve was targeted in 77.9% of cases, and the median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-156 months). Initial pain relief (modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grades I-IIIa) was noted in 81.8% of evaluable patients at a median of 30 days. Of 709 patients who achieved initial pain relief, 42.3% experienced at least one pain recurrence after GKRS at a median of 44 months, with 49.0% of these patients undergoing a second procedure. New-onset facial numbness occurred in 25.3% of patients after a median of 8 months. Age ≥ 63 years was associated with a higher probability of both initial pain relief and maintaining pain relief. A distal target location was associated with a higher probability of initial and long-term pain relief, but also a higher incidence of sensory dysfunction. BED ≥ 2100 Gy2.47 was predictive of pain relief at 30 days and 1 year for the distal target, whereas physical dose ≥ 85 Gy was significant for the proximal target, but the restricted range of BED values in this subgroup could be a confounding factor. A maximum brainstem point dose ≥ 29.5 Gy was associated with a higher probability of bothersome facial numbness. CONCLUSIONS: BED and physical dose were both predictive of pain relief and could be used as treatment planning goals for distal and proximal targets, respectively, while considering maximum brainstem point dose < 29.5 Gy as a potential constraint for bothersome numbness.
Department of Neurological Surgery University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia
Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny Health Network Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
Department of Neurosurgery Koç University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey
Department of Neurosurgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania
Department of Radiation Oncology Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Departments of11Neurosurgery and
Departments of9Neurosurgery and
Division of Neurosurgery University of Sherbrooke CHUS Research Center Sherbrooke Québec Canada
Division of Radiation Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department CEDIMAT Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
Gamma Knife Center Jewish Hospital Mayfield Clinic Cincinnati Ohio
Neuro Informatics Laboratory Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota
Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre London United Kingdom
Radiation Oncology New York University Langone Medical Center New York New York
Radiation Oncology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019617
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110620.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3171/2023.12.JNS231569 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38364220
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Warnick, Ronald E $u 1Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
- 245 14
- $a The relevance of biologically effective dose for pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: an 871-patient multicenter study / $c RE. Warnick, I. Paddick, D. Mathieu, E. Adam, C. Iorio-Morin, W. Leduc, A. Hamel, SE. Johnson, M. Bydon, A. Niranjan, LD. Lunsford, Z. Wei, K. Waite, S. Jose, S. Peker, MY. Samanci, E. Tek, G. Mantziaris, S. Pikis, JP. Sheehan, M. Tripathi, N. Kumar, JD. Alzate, K. Bernstein, P. Ahorukomeye, VR. Kshettry, H. Speckter, W. Hernandez, D. Urgošík, R. Liščák, AI. Yang, JYK. Lee, S. Patel, DM. Kusyk, MJ. Shepard, D. Kondziolka
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that biologically effective dose (BED) is an important correlate of pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The goal of this study was to determine if BED is superior to prescription dose in predicting outcomes in TN patients undergoing GKRS as a first procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 871 patients with type 1 TN from 13 GKRS centers. Patient demographics, pain characteristics, treatment parameters, and outcomes were reviewed. BED was compared with prescription dose and other dosimetric factors for their predictive value. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 60% were female. Nearly 70% of patients experienced pain in the V2 and/or V3 dermatomes, predominantly on the right side (60%). Most patients had modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grade IV or V pain (89.2%) and were taking 1 or 2 pain medications (74.1%). The median prescription dose was 80 Gy (range 62.5-95 Gy). The proximal trigeminal nerve was targeted in 77.9% of cases, and the median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-156 months). Initial pain relief (modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grades I-IIIa) was noted in 81.8% of evaluable patients at a median of 30 days. Of 709 patients who achieved initial pain relief, 42.3% experienced at least one pain recurrence after GKRS at a median of 44 months, with 49.0% of these patients undergoing a second procedure. New-onset facial numbness occurred in 25.3% of patients after a median of 8 months. Age ≥ 63 years was associated with a higher probability of both initial pain relief and maintaining pain relief. A distal target location was associated with a higher probability of initial and long-term pain relief, but also a higher incidence of sensory dysfunction. BED ≥ 2100 Gy2.47 was predictive of pain relief at 30 days and 1 year for the distal target, whereas physical dose ≥ 85 Gy was significant for the proximal target, but the restricted range of BED values in this subgroup could be a confounding factor. A maximum brainstem point dose ≥ 29.5 Gy was associated with a higher probability of bothersome facial numbness. CONCLUSIONS: BED and physical dose were both predictive of pain relief and could be used as treatment planning goals for distal and proximal targets, respectively, while considering maximum brainstem point dose < 29.5 Gy as a potential constraint for bothersome numbness.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a neuralgie trigeminu $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D014277
- 650 12
- $a radiochirurgie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016634
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a měření bolesti $7 D010147
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Paddick, Ian $u 2Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, London, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Mathieu, David $u 3Division of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Adam, Elizabeth $u 3Division of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Iorio-Morin, Christian $u 3Division of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Leduc, William $u 3Division of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Hamel, Andréanne $u 3Division of Neurosurgery, University of Sherbrooke, CHUS Research Center, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Johnson, Sarah E $u 4Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- 700 1_
- $a Bydon, Mohamad $u 4Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- 700 1_
- $a Niranjan, Ajay $u 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Lunsford, L Dade $u 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Wei, Zhishuo $u 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Waite, Kaitlin $u 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Jose, Shalini $u 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Peker, Selcuk $u 6Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Samanci, Mustafa Yavuz $u 6Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Tek, Ece $u 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Mantziaris, Georgios $u 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
- 700 1_
- $a Pikis, Stylianos $u 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
- 700 1_
- $a Sheehan, Jason P $u 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
- 700 1_
- $a Tripathi, Manjul $u Departments of9Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Kumar, Narendra $u 10Radiation Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
- 700 1_
- $a Alzate, Juan Diego $u Departments of11Neurosurgery and
- 700 1_
- $a Bernstein, Kenneth $u 12Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
- 700 1_
- $a Ahorukomeye, Peter $u 13Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- 700 1_
- $a Kshettry, Varun R $u 13Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- 700 1_
- $a Speckter, Herwin $u 14Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hernandez, Wenceslao $u 14Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Urgošík, Dušan $u 15Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Liščák, Roman $u 15Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Yang, Andrew I $u 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Lee, John Y K $u 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Patel, Samir $u 17Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and
- 700 1_
- $a Kusyk, Dorian M $u 18Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Shepard, Matthew J $u 18Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 700 1_
- $a Kondziolka, Douglas $u Departments of11Neurosurgery and
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002843 $t Journal of neurosurgery $x 1933-0693 $g Roč. 141, č. 2 (2024), s. 461-473
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38364220 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110614 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202072 $s 1231590
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 141 $c 2 $d 461-473 $e 20240216 $i 1933-0693 $m Journal of neurosurgery $n J Neurosurg $x MED00002843
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015