• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Understanding the value of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in acutely ill medical patients presenting to the emergency department: a prospective single center evaluation

M. Kralovcova, J. Müller, Z. Hajsmanova, P. Sigutova, L. Bultasova, J. Palatova, M. Matejovic

. 2024 ; 14 (1) : 15255. [pub] 20240702

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019820

The monocyte distribution width (MDW) has emerged as a promising biomarker for accurate and early identification of patients with potentially life-threatening infections. Here we tested the diagnostic performance of MDW in adult patients requiring hospital admission for community-acquired infections and sepsis, evaluated sources of heterogeneity in the estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and assessed the meaning of MDW in a patient population presenting to the emergency department (ED) for acute non-infectious conditions. 1925 consecutive patients were categorized into three groups: non-infection (n = 1507), infection (n = 316), and sepsis/septic shock (n = 102). Diagnostic performance for infection or sepsis of MDW alone or in combination with components of SOFA was tested using AUC of ROC curves, sensitivity, and specificity. The relationship between MDW and different pathogens as well as the impact of non-infectious conditions on MDW values were explored. For the prediction of infection, the AUC/ROC of MDW (0.84) was nearly overlapping that of procalcitonin (0.83), and C-reactive protein (0.89). Statistical optimal cut-off value for MDW was 21 for predicting infection (sensitivity 73%, specificity 82%) and 22 for predicting sepsis (sensitivity 79%, specificity 83%). The best threshold to rule out infection was MDW ≤ 17 (NPV 96.9, 95% CI 88.3-100.0), and ≤ 18 (NPV 99.5, 95% CI 98.3-100.0) to rule out sepsis. The combination of MDW with markers of organ dysfunction (creatinine, bilirubin, platelets) substantially improved the AUC (0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97); specificity and sensitivity of 88% and 94%, respectively). In conclusion, MDW has a good diagnostic performance in diagnosing infection and sepsis in patients presenting in ED. Its use as an infection marker even increases when combined with other markers of organ dysfunction. Understanding the impact of interactions of non-infectious conditions and comorbidities on MDW and its diagnostic accuracy requires further elucidation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019820
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110950.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-024-65883-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38956252
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kralovcova, Marcela $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Understanding the value of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in acutely ill medical patients presenting to the emergency department: a prospective single center evaluation / $c M. Kralovcova, J. Müller, Z. Hajsmanova, P. Sigutova, L. Bultasova, J. Palatova, M. Matejovic
520    9_
$a The monocyte distribution width (MDW) has emerged as a promising biomarker for accurate and early identification of patients with potentially life-threatening infections. Here we tested the diagnostic performance of MDW in adult patients requiring hospital admission for community-acquired infections and sepsis, evaluated sources of heterogeneity in the estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and assessed the meaning of MDW in a patient population presenting to the emergency department (ED) for acute non-infectious conditions. 1925 consecutive patients were categorized into three groups: non-infection (n = 1507), infection (n = 316), and sepsis/septic shock (n = 102). Diagnostic performance for infection or sepsis of MDW alone or in combination with components of SOFA was tested using AUC of ROC curves, sensitivity, and specificity. The relationship between MDW and different pathogens as well as the impact of non-infectious conditions on MDW values were explored. For the prediction of infection, the AUC/ROC of MDW (0.84) was nearly overlapping that of procalcitonin (0.83), and C-reactive protein (0.89). Statistical optimal cut-off value for MDW was 21 for predicting infection (sensitivity 73%, specificity 82%) and 22 for predicting sepsis (sensitivity 79%, specificity 83%). The best threshold to rule out infection was MDW ≤ 17 (NPV 96.9, 95% CI 88.3-100.0), and ≤ 18 (NPV 99.5, 95% CI 98.3-100.0) to rule out sepsis. The combination of MDW with markers of organ dysfunction (creatinine, bilirubin, platelets) substantially improved the AUC (0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97); specificity and sensitivity of 88% and 94%, respectively). In conclusion, MDW has a good diagnostic performance in diagnosing infection and sepsis in patients presenting in ED. Its use as an infection marker even increases when combined with other markers of organ dysfunction. Understanding the impact of interactions of non-infectious conditions and comorbidities on MDW and its diagnostic accuracy requires further elucidation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a urgentní služby nemocnice $7 D004636
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a sepse $x diagnóza $x krev $7 D018805
650    12
$a monocyty $x metabolismus $7 D009000
650    12
$a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a akutní nemoc $7 D000208
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a infekce získané v komunitě $x diagnóza $7 D017714
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Müller, Jiri $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hajsmanova, Zdenka $u Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sigutova, Pavla $u Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bultasova, Lenka $u Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Palatova, Jana $u Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Matejovic, Martin $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic. matejovic@fnplzen.cz
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 14, č. 1 (2024), s. 15255
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38956252 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110944 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202192 $s 1231793
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 14 $c 1 $d 15255 $e 20240702 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...