• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

LVSP and LBBP Result in Similar or Improved LV Synchrony and Hemodynamics Compared to BVP

K. Curila, L. Poviser, P. Stros, P. Jurak, Z. Whinnett, M. Jastrzebski, P. Waldauf, R. Smisek, I. Viscor, M. Hozman, P. Osmancik, L. Kryze, J. Kautzner

. 2024 ; 10 (7 Pt 2) : 1722-1732. [pub] 20240516

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019889

BACKGROUND: The effect of left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) on ventricular synchrony and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic status is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVSP and LBBP vs biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular electrical synchrony and hemodynamic status in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. METHODS: In cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates with LV conduction disease, ventricular synchrony was assessed by measuring QRS duration (QRSd) and using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography. LV electrical dyssynchrony was assessed as the difference between the first activation in leads V1 to V8 to the last from leads V4 to V8. LV hemodynamic status was estimated using invasive systolic blood pressure measurement during multiple transitions between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with a mean LV ejection fraction of 29% and a mean QRSd of 168 ± 24 ms were included. Thirteen had ischemic cardiomyopathy. QRSd during BVP, LVSP, and LBBP was the same, but LBBP provided shorter LV electrical dyssynchrony than BVP (-10 ms; 95% CI: -16 to -4 ms; P = 0.001); the difference between LVSP and BVP was not significant (-5 ms; 95% CI: -12 to 1 ms; P = 0.10). LBBP was associated with higher systolic blood pressure than BVP (4%; 95% CI: 2%-5%; P < 0.001), whereas LVSP was not (1%; 95% CI: 0%-2%; P = 0.10). Hemodynamic differences during LBBP and LVSP vs BVP were more pronounced in nonischemic than ischemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography allowed the documentation of differences in LV synchrony between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP, which were not observed by measuring QRSd. LVSP provided the same LV synchrony and hemodynamic status as BVP, while LBBP was better than BVP in both.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019889
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111015.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.022 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38829298
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Curila, Karol $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: karol.curila@fnkv.cz
245    10
$a LVSP and LBBP Result in Similar or Improved LV Synchrony and Hemodynamics Compared to BVP / $c K. Curila, L. Poviser, P. Stros, P. Jurak, Z. Whinnett, M. Jastrzebski, P. Waldauf, R. Smisek, I. Viscor, M. Hozman, P. Osmancik, L. Kryze, J. Kautzner
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The effect of left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) on ventricular synchrony and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic status is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVSP and LBBP vs biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular electrical synchrony and hemodynamic status in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. METHODS: In cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates with LV conduction disease, ventricular synchrony was assessed by measuring QRS duration (QRSd) and using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography. LV electrical dyssynchrony was assessed as the difference between the first activation in leads V1 to V8 to the last from leads V4 to V8. LV hemodynamic status was estimated using invasive systolic blood pressure measurement during multiple transitions between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with a mean LV ejection fraction of 29% and a mean QRSd of 168 ± 24 ms were included. Thirteen had ischemic cardiomyopathy. QRSd during BVP, LVSP, and LBBP was the same, but LBBP provided shorter LV electrical dyssynchrony than BVP (-10 ms; 95% CI: -16 to -4 ms; P = 0.001); the difference between LVSP and BVP was not significant (-5 ms; 95% CI: -12 to 1 ms; P = 0.10). LBBP was associated with higher systolic blood pressure than BVP (4%; 95% CI: 2%-5%; P < 0.001), whereas LVSP was not (1%; 95% CI: 0%-2%; P = 0.10). Hemodynamic differences during LBBP and LVSP vs BVP were more pronounced in nonischemic than ischemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography allowed the documentation of differences in LV synchrony between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP, which were not observed by measuring QRSd. LVSP provided the same LV synchrony and hemodynamic status as BVP, while LBBP was better than BVP in both.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a srdeční resynchronizační terapie $x metody $7 D058406
650    12
$a hemodynamika $x fyziologie $7 D006439
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a dysfunkce levé srdeční komory $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D018487
650    _2
$a funkce levé komory srdeční $x fyziologie $7 D016277
650    _2
$a mezikomorová přepážka $x patofyziologie $7 D054088
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Poviser, Lukas $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stros, Petr $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jurak, Pavel $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Whinnett, Zachary $u Department of Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Jastrzebski, Marek $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Krakow, Poland
700    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smisek, Radovan $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Viscor, Ivo $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hozman, Marek $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kryze, Lukas $u Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef $u Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 10, č. 7 Pt 2 (2024), s. 1722-1732
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38829298 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111009 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202227 $s 1231862
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 7 Pt 2 $d 1722-1732 $e 20240516 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...