Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Anti-stigma advocacy for health professionals: a systematic review

Z. Guerrero, B. Iruretagoyena, S. Parry, C. Henderson

. 2024 ; 33 (3) : 394-414. [pub] 20230315

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review

Grant support
MR/R023697/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Many anti-stigma programs for healthcare workers already exist however there is less research on the effectiveness of training in skills for health professionals to counter stigma and its impacts on patients. AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the theory base, content, delivery, and outcomes of interventions for healthcare professionals which aim to equip them with knowledge and skills to aid patients to mitigate stigma and discrimination and their health impacts. METHODS: Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Data were screened by two independent reviewers, conflicts were discussed. Quality appraisal was realized using the ICROMS tool. A narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: The final number of studies was 41. In terms of theory base, there are three strands - responsibility as part of the professional role, correction of wrongful practices, and collaboration with local communities. Content focusses either on specific groups experiencing health-related stigma or health advocacy in general. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest programs should link definitions of stigma to the role of the professional. They should be developed following a situational analysis and include people with lived experience. Training should use interactive delivery methods. Evaluation should include follow-up times that allow examination of behavioural change. PROSPERO, ID: CRD42020212527.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24020002
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110928.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/09638237.2023.2182421 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36919957
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Guerrero, Zoe $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000183063610
245    10
$a Anti-stigma advocacy for health professionals: a systematic review / $c Z. Guerrero, B. Iruretagoyena, S. Parry, C. Henderson
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Many anti-stigma programs for healthcare workers already exist however there is less research on the effectiveness of training in skills for health professionals to counter stigma and its impacts on patients. AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the theory base, content, delivery, and outcomes of interventions for healthcare professionals which aim to equip them with knowledge and skills to aid patients to mitigate stigma and discrimination and their health impacts. METHODS: Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Data were screened by two independent reviewers, conflicts were discussed. Quality appraisal was realized using the ICROMS tool. A narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: The final number of studies was 41. In terms of theory base, there are three strands - responsibility as part of the professional role, correction of wrongful practices, and collaboration with local communities. Content focusses either on specific groups experiencing health-related stigma or health advocacy in general. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest programs should link definitions of stigma to the role of the professional. They should be developed following a situational analysis and include people with lived experience. Training should use interactive delivery methods. Evaluation should include follow-up times that allow examination of behavioural change. PROSPERO, ID: CRD42020212527.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a společenské stigma $7 D057545
650    12
$a zdravotnický personál $x psychologie $x výchova $7 D006282
650    _2
$a ochrana zájmů pacientů $7 D010344
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Iruretagoyena, Barbara $u Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Las Condes, Chile
700    1_
$a Parry, Sarah $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000297303547
700    1_
$a Henderson, Claire $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $u Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269985659
773    0_
$w MED00005897 $t Journal of mental health $x 1360-0567 $g Roč. 33, č. 3 (2024), s. 394-414
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36919957 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110922 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202314 $s 1231975
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 33 $c 3 $d 394-414 $e 20230315 $i 1360-0567 $m Journal of mental health $n J Ment Health $x MED00005897
GRA    __
$a MR/R023697/1 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...