-
Something wrong with this record ?
Anti-stigma advocacy for health professionals: a systematic review
Z. Guerrero, B. Iruretagoyena, S. Parry, C. Henderson
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review
Grant support
MR/R023697/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient Advocacy MeSH
- Social Stigma * MeSH
- Health Personnel * psychology education MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Many anti-stigma programs for healthcare workers already exist however there is less research on the effectiveness of training in skills for health professionals to counter stigma and its impacts on patients. AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the theory base, content, delivery, and outcomes of interventions for healthcare professionals which aim to equip them with knowledge and skills to aid patients to mitigate stigma and discrimination and their health impacts. METHODS: Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Data were screened by two independent reviewers, conflicts were discussed. Quality appraisal was realized using the ICROMS tool. A narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: The final number of studies was 41. In terms of theory base, there are three strands - responsibility as part of the professional role, correction of wrongful practices, and collaboration with local communities. Content focusses either on specific groups experiencing health-related stigma or health advocacy in general. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest programs should link definitions of stigma to the role of the professional. They should be developed following a situational analysis and include people with lived experience. Training should use interactive delivery methods. Evaluation should include follow-up times that allow examination of behavioural change. PROSPERO, ID: CRD42020212527.
Department of Neurology and Psychiatry Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo Las Condes Chile
Department of Public Mental Health National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24020002
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110928.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/09638237.2023.2182421 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36919957
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Guerrero, Zoe $u Department of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000183063610
- 245 10
- $a Anti-stigma advocacy for health professionals: a systematic review / $c Z. Guerrero, B. Iruretagoyena, S. Parry, C. Henderson
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Many anti-stigma programs for healthcare workers already exist however there is less research on the effectiveness of training in skills for health professionals to counter stigma and its impacts on patients. AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the theory base, content, delivery, and outcomes of interventions for healthcare professionals which aim to equip them with knowledge and skills to aid patients to mitigate stigma and discrimination and their health impacts. METHODS: Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Data were screened by two independent reviewers, conflicts were discussed. Quality appraisal was realized using the ICROMS tool. A narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: The final number of studies was 41. In terms of theory base, there are three strands - responsibility as part of the professional role, correction of wrongful practices, and collaboration with local communities. Content focusses either on specific groups experiencing health-related stigma or health advocacy in general. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest programs should link definitions of stigma to the role of the professional. They should be developed following a situational analysis and include people with lived experience. Training should use interactive delivery methods. Evaluation should include follow-up times that allow examination of behavioural change. PROSPERO, ID: CRD42020212527.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a společenské stigma $7 D057545
- 650 12
- $a zdravotnický personál $x psychologie $x výchova $7 D006282
- 650 _2
- $a ochrana zájmů pacientů $7 D010344
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Iruretagoyena, Barbara $u Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Las Condes, Chile
- 700 1_
- $a Parry, Sarah $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000297303547
- 700 1_
- $a Henderson, Claire $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $u Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269985659
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005897 $t Journal of mental health $x 1360-0567 $g Roč. 33, č. 3 (2024), s. 394-414
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36919957 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110922 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202314 $s 1231975
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 33 $c 3 $d 394-414 $e 20230315 $i 1360-0567 $m Journal of mental health $n J Ment Health $x MED00005897
- GRA __
- $a MR/R023697/1 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015