• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

One-Year Clinical Outcomes Following Aspheric Toric Monofocal IOL with a Double C-Loop Haptic Design Implantation

RET. Ang, P. Tañá-Rivero, F. Pastor-Pascual, P. Stodulka, M. Slovak, M. Tetz, I. Fischinger, J. Cazal, M. Gessa-Sorroche, M. Ibarz-Barberá, D. Holland, T. Groneberg

. 2024 ; 18 (-) : 3515-3525. [pub] 20241128

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland

Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25002065

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate one-year clinical outcomes in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism implanted with a biconvex aspheric toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a double C-loop haptic-design. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients (236 eyes) with corneal astigmatism (≥0.75D) were implanted bilaterally with the PODEYE toric IOL and assessed up to 1-year after surgery. Postoperative evaluation included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), under both photopic and mesopic lighting conditions, refraction, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (with and without glare), and rotational stability. RESULTS: At the last postoperative visit, 74.6% and 95.8% of eyes were within ±0.50D and ±1.00D of the target refraction, respectively. About 78.0% and 97.5% of eyes showed a postoperative refractive cylinder of ≤0.50D and ≤1.00D, respectively. The mean manifest spherical equivalent value was 0.16±0.40D, and the mean refractive cylinder value was -0.42±0.33D. 97.5% and 100% of patients had a binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/32, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.01±0.09 and -0.03±0.07 logMAR, respectively. Under mesopic conditions, 79.5% and 89.8% of patients showed a binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/32, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.15±0.11 and 0.10±0.10 logMAR, respectively. Binocular contrast sensitivity function both under photopic and mesopic conditions was good. The mean absolute IOL rotation was 2.52±2.59 degrees with 98.56% of eyes having a rotation of less than 10 degrees. CONCLUSION: Bilateral implantation of an aspheric toric monofocal IOL with a double C-loop haptic design in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism provides good visual and refractive outcomes up to 1-year post-surgery.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002065
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250123102024.0
007      
ta
008      
250117e20241128nz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2147/OPTH.S494313 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39629057
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a nz
100    1_
$a Ang, Robert Edward T $u Asian Eye Institute, Makati, Philippines $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250352923
245    10
$a One-Year Clinical Outcomes Following Aspheric Toric Monofocal IOL with a Double C-Loop Haptic Design Implantation / $c RET. Ang, P. Tañá-Rivero, F. Pastor-Pascual, P. Stodulka, M. Slovak, M. Tetz, I. Fischinger, J. Cazal, M. Gessa-Sorroche, M. Ibarz-Barberá, D. Holland, T. Groneberg
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate one-year clinical outcomes in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism implanted with a biconvex aspheric toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a double C-loop haptic-design. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients (236 eyes) with corneal astigmatism (≥0.75D) were implanted bilaterally with the PODEYE toric IOL and assessed up to 1-year after surgery. Postoperative evaluation included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), under both photopic and mesopic lighting conditions, refraction, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (with and without glare), and rotational stability. RESULTS: At the last postoperative visit, 74.6% and 95.8% of eyes were within ±0.50D and ±1.00D of the target refraction, respectively. About 78.0% and 97.5% of eyes showed a postoperative refractive cylinder of ≤0.50D and ≤1.00D, respectively. The mean manifest spherical equivalent value was 0.16±0.40D, and the mean refractive cylinder value was -0.42±0.33D. 97.5% and 100% of patients had a binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/32, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.01±0.09 and -0.03±0.07 logMAR, respectively. Under mesopic conditions, 79.5% and 89.8% of patients showed a binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/32, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.15±0.11 and 0.10±0.10 logMAR, respectively. Binocular contrast sensitivity function both under photopic and mesopic conditions was good. The mean absolute IOL rotation was 2.52±2.59 degrees with 98.56% of eyes having a rotation of less than 10 degrees. CONCLUSION: Bilateral implantation of an aspheric toric monofocal IOL with a double C-loop haptic design in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism provides good visual and refractive outcomes up to 1-year post-surgery.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a kazuistiky $7 D002363
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tañá-Rivero, Pedro $u Oftalvist, Alicante, Spain
700    1_
$a Pastor-Pascual, Francisco $u Oftalvist, Valencia, Spain
700    1_
$a Stodulka, Pavel $u GEMINI Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000023213640X
700    1_
$a Slovak, Martin $u GEMINI Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tetz, Manfred $u Berlin Eye Research Institute (BERI), Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Fischinger, Isaak $u Berlin Eye Research Institute (BERI), Wittenberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Cazal, Jorge $u Miranza IMO Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Gessa-Sorroche, Maria $u Miranza Virgen de Luján, Sevilla, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000154171495
700    1_
$a Ibarz-Barberá, Marta $u Oftalvist, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Holland, Detlef $u Augenzentrum ONE, Kiel, Germany
700    1_
$a Groneberg, Thomas $u Augenzentrum Erding, Erding, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00165196 $t Clinical ophthalmology $x 1177-5467 $g Roč. 18 (20241128), s. 3515-3525
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39629057 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250123102018 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254467 $s 1238068
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 18 $c - $d 3515-3525 $e 20241128 $i 1177-5467 $m Clinical ophthalmology $n Clin Ophthalmol $x MED00165196
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace