Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults

T. Nolan, C. Bhusal, J. Beran, M. Bloch, BS. Cetin, EC. Dinleyici, D. Dražan, S. Kokko, S. Koski, O. Laajalahti, JM. Langley, M. Rämet, PC. Richmond, P. Silas, B. Tapiero, F. Tiong, M. Tipton, B. Ukkonen, B. Ulukol, M. Lattanzi, M. Trapani, A....

. 2024 ; 11 (11) : ofae638. [pub] 20241030

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25002223

BACKGROUND: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains. RESULTS: Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule.

AusTrials Tarragindi QLD Australia

Canadian Center for Vaccinology Halifax NS Canada

CHU Sainte Justine Montreal QC Canada

Copperview Medical Center South Jordan Utah USA

Department of Medicine Kirby Institute University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia

Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine Kayseri Türkiye

Department of Pediatrics Ankara University School of Medicine Ankara Türkiye

Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Eskisehir Türkiye

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology FVR Finnish Vaccine Research Tampere University Tampere Finland

FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University Espoo Clinic Espoo Finland

FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University Seinäjoen Rokotetutkimusklinikka Seinäjoki Finland

General Practice for Children and Adolescents Jindřichův Hradec Czechia

GSK Amsterdam The Netherlands

GSK Siena Italy

Helsinki South Clinic FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University Finland

Holdsworth House Medical Practice Sydney NSW Australia

Infectious Diseases Division Department of Pediatrics University of Montreal QC Canada

Oulu Vaccine Research Clinic FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University Oulu Finland

University of Western Australia School of Medicine and Vaccine Trials Group Telethon Kids Institute Nedlands Washington Australia

Vaccination and Travel Medicine Centre Hradec Králové Czechia

Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group Peter Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia

Wee Care Pediatrics Syracuse Utah USA

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002223
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250123102007.0
007      
ta
008      
250117s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ofid/ofae638 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39582508
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Nolan, Terry $u Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Peter Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
245    10
$a 4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults / $c T. Nolan, C. Bhusal, J. Beran, M. Bloch, BS. Cetin, EC. Dinleyici, D. Dražan, S. Kokko, S. Koski, O. Laajalahti, JM. Langley, M. Rämet, PC. Richmond, P. Silas, B. Tapiero, F. Tiong, M. Tipton, B. Ukkonen, B. Ulukol, M. Lattanzi, M. Trapani, A. Willemsen, D. Toneatto, QUINTET study group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains. RESULTS: Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bhusal, Chiranjiwi $u GSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Beran, Jiří $u Vaccination and Travel Medicine Centre, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Bloch, Mark $u Holdsworth House Medical Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia $u Department of Medicine, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
700    1_
$a Cetin, Benhur S $u Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284704907
700    1_
$a Dinleyici, Ener C $u Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye $1 https://orcid.org/0000000203390134
700    1_
$a Dražan, Daniel $u General Practice for Children and Adolescents, Jindřichův Hradec, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kokko, Satu $u Oulu Vaccine Research Clinic, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Oulu, Finland
700    1_
$a Koski, Susanna $u Helsinki South Clinic, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320788475
700    1_
$a Laajalahti, Outi $u FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Seinäjoen Rokotetutkimusklinikka, Seinäjoki, Finland
700    1_
$a Langley, Joanne M $u Canadian Center for Vaccinology (Dalhousie University, IWK Health and Nova Scotia Health), Halifax, NS, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000332707345
700    1_
$a Rämet, Mika $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland $1 https://orcid.org/000000025776164X
700    1_
$a Richmond, Peter C $u University of Western Australia School of Medicine and Vaccine Trials Group, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Washington, Australia
700    1_
$a Silas, Peter $u Wee Care Pediatrics, Syracuse, Utah, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000309800701
700    1_
$a Tapiero, Bruce $u CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada $u Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, QC, Canada
700    1_
$a Tiong, Florence $u AusTrials (Wellers Hill), Tarragindi, QLD, Australia
700    1_
$a Tipton, Mary $u Copperview Medical Center, South Jordan, Utah, USA $1 https://orcid.org/000000033002521X
700    1_
$a Ukkonen, Benita $u FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Espoo Clinic, Espoo, Finland
700    1_
$a Ulukol, Betul $u Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
700    1_
$a Lattanzi, Maria $u GSK, Siena, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/000000023457426X
700    1_
$a Trapani, Mauro $u GSK, Siena, Italy
700    1_
$a Willemsen, Arnold $u GSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000169444249
700    1_
$a Toneatto, Daniela $u GSK, Siena, Italy
710    2_
$a QUINTET study group
773    0_
$w MED00188131 $t Open forum infectious diseases $x 2328-8957 $g Roč. 11, č. 11 (2024), s. ofae638
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39582508 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250123102001 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254507 $s 1238226
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 11 $c 11 $d ofae638 $e 20241030 $i 2328-8957 $m Open forum infectious diseases $n Open Forum Infect Dis $x MED00188131
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...