Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Extreme Obesity: Comparison of the Harris-Benedict Equation with Indirect Calorimetry

A. Jílková, B. Lampová, O. Kádě, L. Kouřimská, D. Chrpová, I. Kaiserová, M. Matoulek

. 2024 ; 13 (19) : . [pub] 20241008

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
CZ-DRO-VFN64165 Metabolic Diseases - 207037-1
LM2023064 METROFOOD-CZ

Background: The main objective of the work was the analysis and description of data on body composition and resting energy expenditure (REE) values of selected groups of patients with obesity whose REE measurement results using indirect calorimetry reached a level below 95% of the predicted REE calculated using the Harris-Benedict (H-B) equation. The sub-goals were to describe the dependence of body composition on the size of the REE and to find out if the deviations between the number of the total measured REE and the REE calculated using H-B in the adapted group (patients with altered REE values, lower than expected caused by long caloric restriction) are significant. Methods: For the research, 71 (39 women and 32 men) patients treated in obesitology were selected. Patients underwent the measurement of resting metabolism using indirect calorimetry (IC) and body composition measurement on the bioimpedance device and, at the same time, the value of resting metabolism was calculated for everyone using the H-B equation. The whole group was divided into five groups according to the deviation of the measurement using IC and the calculation of the H-B equation. Results: In the total set of examined individuals, there were 32.4% with a reduced REE value compared to the REE calculation according to the H-B equation, which corresponds to 23 individuals. In the adapted group, the average measured REE was 2242 ± 616 kcal compared to the H-B calculation of 2638 ± 713 kcal. Statistically, these results were not significant, but a high case-to-case variation was found. The highest deviation from the H-B predictive calculation was -42% and +43% in the whole research group. The amount of muscle tissue in the adapted group averaged 44.3 ± 11.9 kg and the amount of fat-free mass (FFM) 77.9 ± 20.1 kg. When statistically testing the dependence of REE on FFM and muscle tissue in the adapted group, a strong correlation was found. Conclusions: The H-B equation alone is not suitable for setting a suitable diet therapy for an individual with obesity. In order to select and characterize a group of adapted individuals, it will be necessary to use other methods or a larger research sample, and preferably examine and divide patients with specific comorbidities or include their health status.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002407
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250123101926.0
007      
ta
008      
250117s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/jcm13195993 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39408053
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Jílková, Anna $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Extreme Obesity: Comparison of the Harris-Benedict Equation with Indirect Calorimetry / $c A. Jílková, B. Lampová, O. Kádě, L. Kouřimská, D. Chrpová, I. Kaiserová, M. Matoulek
520    9_
$a Background: The main objective of the work was the analysis and description of data on body composition and resting energy expenditure (REE) values of selected groups of patients with obesity whose REE measurement results using indirect calorimetry reached a level below 95% of the predicted REE calculated using the Harris-Benedict (H-B) equation. The sub-goals were to describe the dependence of body composition on the size of the REE and to find out if the deviations between the number of the total measured REE and the REE calculated using H-B in the adapted group (patients with altered REE values, lower than expected caused by long caloric restriction) are significant. Methods: For the research, 71 (39 women and 32 men) patients treated in obesitology were selected. Patients underwent the measurement of resting metabolism using indirect calorimetry (IC) and body composition measurement on the bioimpedance device and, at the same time, the value of resting metabolism was calculated for everyone using the H-B equation. The whole group was divided into five groups according to the deviation of the measurement using IC and the calculation of the H-B equation. Results: In the total set of examined individuals, there were 32.4% with a reduced REE value compared to the REE calculation according to the H-B equation, which corresponds to 23 individuals. In the adapted group, the average measured REE was 2242 ± 616 kcal compared to the H-B calculation of 2638 ± 713 kcal. Statistically, these results were not significant, but a high case-to-case variation was found. The highest deviation from the H-B predictive calculation was -42% and +43% in the whole research group. The amount of muscle tissue in the adapted group averaged 44.3 ± 11.9 kg and the amount of fat-free mass (FFM) 77.9 ± 20.1 kg. When statistically testing the dependence of REE on FFM and muscle tissue in the adapted group, a strong correlation was found. Conclusions: The H-B equation alone is not suitable for setting a suitable diet therapy for an individual with obesity. In order to select and characterize a group of adapted individuals, it will be necessary to use other methods or a larger research sample, and preferably examine and divide patients with specific comorbidities or include their health status.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lampová, Barbora $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000347661271
700    1_
$a Kádě, Ondřej $u 3rd Internal Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, General University Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339115414
700    1_
$a Kouřimská, Lenka $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000211027239 $7 mzk2005274994
700    1_
$a Chrpová, Diana $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000340207524
700    1_
$a Kaiserová, Iveta $u 3rd Internal Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, General University Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000400059712
700    1_
$a Matoulek, Martin $u 3rd Internal Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, General University Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269902876 $7 xx0080325
773    0_
$w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 13, č. 19 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39408053 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250123101920 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254563 $s 1238410
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 13 $c 19 $e 20241008 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
GRA    __
$a CZ-DRO-VFN64165 $p Metabolic Diseases - 207037-1
GRA    __
$a LM2023064 $p METROFOOD-CZ
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...