-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of tissue viscoelasticity on delivered mechanical power in a physical respiratory system model: distinguishing between airway and tissue resistance
S. Walzel, K. Roubik
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39591658
DOI
10.1088/2057-1976/ad974b
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- dýchací soustava MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mechanika dýchání MeSH
- plíce * fyziologie MeSH
- poddajnost plic MeSH
- pružnost * MeSH
- rezistence dýchacích cest * MeSH
- tlak MeSH
- umělé dýchání metody MeSH
- viskozita MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Understanding the mechanics of the respiratory system is crucial for optimizing ventilator settings and ensuring patient safety. While simple models of the respiratory system typically consider only flow resistance and lung compliance, lung tissue resistance is usually neglected. This study investigated the effect of lung tissue viscoelasticity on delivered mechanical power in a physical model of the respiratory system and the possibility of distinguishing tissue resistance from airway resistance using proximal pressure measured at the airway opening. Three different configurations of a passive physical model of the respiratory system representing different mechanical properties (Tissue resistance model, Airway resistance model, and No-resistance model) were tested. The same volume-controlled ventilation and parameters were set for each configuration, with only the inspiratory flow rates being adjusted. Pressure and flow were measured with a Datex-Ohmeda S/5 vital signs monitor (Datex-Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA). Tissue resistance was intentionally tuned so that peak pressures and delivered mechanical energy measured at airway opening were similar in Tissue and Airway Resistance models. However, measurements inside the artificial lung revealed significant differences, with Tissue resistance model yielding up to 20% higher values for delivered mechanical energy. The results indicate the need to revise current methods of calculating mechanical power delivery, which do not distinguish between tissue resistance and airway flow resistance, making it difficult to evaluate and interpret the significance of mechanical power delivery in terms of lung ventilation protectivity.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25003093
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206104035.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1088/2057-1976/ad974b $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39591658
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Walzel, Simon $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000313099567
- 245 10
- $a Effect of tissue viscoelasticity on delivered mechanical power in a physical respiratory system model: distinguishing between airway and tissue resistance / $c S. Walzel, K. Roubik
- 520 9_
- $a Understanding the mechanics of the respiratory system is crucial for optimizing ventilator settings and ensuring patient safety. While simple models of the respiratory system typically consider only flow resistance and lung compliance, lung tissue resistance is usually neglected. This study investigated the effect of lung tissue viscoelasticity on delivered mechanical power in a physical model of the respiratory system and the possibility of distinguishing tissue resistance from airway resistance using proximal pressure measured at the airway opening. Three different configurations of a passive physical model of the respiratory system representing different mechanical properties (Tissue resistance model, Airway resistance model, and No-resistance model) were tested. The same volume-controlled ventilation and parameters were set for each configuration, with only the inspiratory flow rates being adjusted. Pressure and flow were measured with a Datex-Ohmeda S/5 vital signs monitor (Datex-Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA). Tissue resistance was intentionally tuned so that peak pressures and delivered mechanical energy measured at airway opening were similar in Tissue and Airway Resistance models. However, measurements inside the artificial lung revealed significant differences, with Tissue resistance model yielding up to 20% higher values for delivered mechanical energy. The results indicate the need to revise current methods of calculating mechanical power delivery, which do not distinguish between tissue resistance and airway flow resistance, making it difficult to evaluate and interpret the significance of mechanical power delivery in terms of lung ventilation protectivity.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a rezistence dýchacích cest $7 D000403
- 650 _2
- $a viskozita $7 D014783
- 650 12
- $a pružnost $7 D004548
- 650 12
- $a plíce $x fyziologie $7 D008168
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a mechanika dýchání $7 D015656
- 650 _2
- $a umělé dýchání $x metody $7 D012121
- 650 _2
- $a tlak $7 D011312
- 650 _2
- $a poddajnost plic $7 D008170
- 650 _2
- $a dýchací soustava $7 D012137
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Roubik, Karel $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00208693 $t Biomedical physics & engineering express $x 2057-1976 $g Roč. 11, č. 1 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39591658 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206104030 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263074 $s 1239100
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 11 $c 1 $e 20241204 $i 2057-1976 $m Biomedical physics & engineering express $n Biomed Phys Eng Express $x MED00208693
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121