Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

J. Matulova, I. Musilova, R. Kukla, R. Bolehovska, K. Balcarova, J. Wiik, V. Sengpiel, P. Bostik, B. Jacobsson, M. Kacerovsky

. 2024 ; 37 (1) : 2425761. [pub] 20241113

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003161

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of Lactobacillus crispatus DNA, Lactobacillus iners DNA, Gardnerella vaginalis DNA, Sneathia sanguinegens DNA, and Ureaplasma species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of L. crispatus DNA, L. iners DNA, G. vaginalis DNA, S. sanguinegens DNA, and U. spp DNA. according to the cone length. METHODS: This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to L. crispatus, L. iners, G. vaginalis, S. sanguinegens, and U. spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available. RESULTS: Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of L. iners DNA (4.4 × 106 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of U. spp. DNA (1.1 × 105 copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL, p = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, p = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of L. crispatus DNA (6% vs. 89%, p = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of L. iners DNA (1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04; 91% vs. 35%, p = .04), and higher loads of G. vaginalis DNA (7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL, p = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003161
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104058.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/14767058.2024.2425761 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39537205
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Matulova, Jana $u Department of Non-medical Studies, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes / $c J. Matulova, I. Musilova, R. Kukla, R. Bolehovska, K. Balcarova, J. Wiik, V. Sengpiel, P. Bostik, B. Jacobsson, M. Kacerovsky
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of Lactobacillus crispatus DNA, Lactobacillus iners DNA, Gardnerella vaginalis DNA, Sneathia sanguinegens DNA, and Ureaplasma species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of L. crispatus DNA, L. iners DNA, G. vaginalis DNA, S. sanguinegens DNA, and U. spp DNA. according to the cone length. METHODS: This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to L. crispatus, L. iners, G. vaginalis, S. sanguinegens, and U. spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available. RESULTS: Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of L. iners DNA (4.4 × 106 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of U. spp. DNA (1.1 × 105 copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL, p = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, p = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of L. crispatus DNA (6% vs. 89%, p = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of L. iners DNA (1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04; 91% vs. 35%, p = .04), and higher loads of G. vaginalis DNA (7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL, p = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a předčasný odtok plodové vody $x mikrobiologie $x epidemiologie $7 D005322
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a cervix uteri $x mikrobiologie $x chirurgie $7 D002584
650    _2
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a Lactobacillus $x izolace a purifikace $x genetika $7 D007778
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x analýza $x izolace a purifikace $7 D004269
650    _2
$a Gardnerella vaginalis $x izolace a purifikace $x genetika $7 D006194
650    _2
$a Ureaplasma $x izolace a purifikace $7 D014509
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Musilova, Ivana $u Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Most, o.z., Krajska zdravotni, Most, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kukla, Rudolf $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bolehovska, Radka $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Balcarova, Klara $u Department of Non-medical Studies, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Wiik, Johanna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
700    1_
$a Sengpiel, Verena $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
700    1_
$a Bostik, Pavel $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jacobsson, Bo $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Domain of Health Data and Digitalization, Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
700    1_
$a Kacerovsky, Marian $u Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Most, o.z., Krajska zdravotni, Most, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000198587900 $7 xx0096559
773    0_
$w MED00007048 $t Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine $x 1476-4954 $g Roč. 37, č. 1 (2024), s. 2425761
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39537205 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104054 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263111 $s 1239168
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 37 $c 1 $d 2425761 $e 20241113 $i 1476-4954 $m Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine $n J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med $x MED00007048
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...