-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
J. Matulova, I. Musilova, R. Kukla, R. Bolehovska, K. Balcarova, J. Wiik, V. Sengpiel, P. Bostik, B. Jacobsson, M. Kacerovsky
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- cervix uteri * mikrobiologie chirurgie MeSH
- DNA bakterií analýza izolace a purifikace MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Gardnerella vaginalis izolace a purifikace genetika MeSH
- Lactobacillus izolace a purifikace genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiota MeSH
- předčasný odtok plodové vody * mikrobiologie epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Ureaplasma izolace a purifikace MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of Lactobacillus crispatus DNA, Lactobacillus iners DNA, Gardnerella vaginalis DNA, Sneathia sanguinegens DNA, and Ureaplasma species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of L. crispatus DNA, L. iners DNA, G. vaginalis DNA, S. sanguinegens DNA, and U. spp DNA. according to the cone length. METHODS: This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to L. crispatus, L. iners, G. vaginalis, S. sanguinegens, and U. spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available. RESULTS: Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of L. iners DNA (4.4 × 106 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of U. spp. DNA (1.1 × 105 copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL, p = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, p = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of L. crispatus DNA (6% vs. 89%, p = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of L. iners DNA (1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04; 91% vs. 35%, p = .04), and higher loads of G. vaginalis DNA (7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL, p = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.
Biomedical Research Center University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Most o z Krajska zdravotni Most Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25003161
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206104058.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/14767058.2024.2425761 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39537205
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Matulova, Jana $u Department of Non-medical Studies, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a History of cervical excisional treatment is associated with changes in the cervical microbiota in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes / $c J. Matulova, I. Musilova, R. Kukla, R. Bolehovska, K. Balcarova, J. Wiik, V. Sengpiel, P. Bostik, B. Jacobsson, M. Kacerovsky
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in the cervical load and prevalence of Lactobacillus crispatus DNA, Lactobacillus iners DNA, Gardnerella vaginalis DNA, Sneathia sanguinegens DNA, and Ureaplasma species DNA between pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) with and without a history of cervical excisional treatment. We also assessed the changes in the cervical load and prevalence of L. crispatus DNA, L. iners DNA, G. vaginalis DNA, S. sanguinegens DNA, and U. spp DNA. according to the cone length. METHODS: This retrospective study included 132 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM. For all women, information about the cervical loads of bacterial DNA corresponding to L. crispatus, L. iners, G. vaginalis, S. sanguinegens, and U. spp., which was assessed using PCR, was available. RESULTS: Women with a history of cervical excisional treatment had a higher cervical load of L. iners DNA (4.4 × 106 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.5 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04) and a higher load and prevalence of U. spp. DNA (1.1 × 105 copies DNA/mL vs. 9.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL, p = .03; 2.7% vs. 0.5%, p = .04) than those without a history of cervical excisional treatment. In the subset of women with a history of cervical excisional treatment, those with a cone length 18 mm and more had a lower relative abundance of L. crispatus DNA (6% vs. 89%, p = .02), a higher load and relative abundance of L. iners DNA (1.1 × 107 copies DNA/mL vs. 8.2 × 105 copies DNA/mL, p = .04; 91% vs. 35%, p = .04), and higher loads of G. vaginalis DNA (7.6 × 104 copies DNA/mL vs. 3.2 × 102 copies DNA/mL, p = .02) than those with cone length < 18 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A history of cervical excisional treatment was associated with alterations in the cervical microbiota composition in pregnant women with PPROM.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a předčasný odtok plodové vody $x mikrobiologie $x epidemiologie $7 D005322
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a cervix uteri $x mikrobiologie $x chirurgie $7 D002584
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a Lactobacillus $x izolace a purifikace $x genetika $7 D007778
- 650 _2
- $a DNA bakterií $x analýza $x izolace a purifikace $7 D004269
- 650 _2
- $a Gardnerella vaginalis $x izolace a purifikace $x genetika $7 D006194
- 650 _2
- $a Ureaplasma $x izolace a purifikace $7 D014509
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Musilova, Ivana $u Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Most, o.z., Krajska zdravotni, Most, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kukla, Rudolf $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bolehovska, Radka $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Balcarova, Klara $u Department of Non-medical Studies, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Wiik, Johanna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Sengpiel, Verena $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Bostik, Pavel $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jacobsson, Bo $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Domain of Health Data and Digitalization, Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Kacerovsky, Marian $u Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Most, o.z., Krajska zdravotni, Most, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000198587900 $7 xx0096559
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007048 $t Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine $x 1476-4954 $g Roč. 37, č. 1 (2024), s. 2425761
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39537205 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206104054 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263111 $s 1239168
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 37 $c 1 $d 2425761 $e 20241113 $i 1476-4954 $m Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine $n J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med $x MED00007048
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121