Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

TMJ synovial chondromatosis - an evaluation of 37 patients

M. Vladimír, V. Vasilis, H. Dušan, P. Robert, B. Michal, F. René

. 2024 ; 28 (4) : 1653-1660. [pub] 20240628

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Letter

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated a cohort of 37 patients with histologically verified synovial chondromatosis (SC) between 2013 and 2022. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 37 patients (26 women, 11 men). 36 patients had unilateral involvement, while one patient had bilateral involvement. The average age of the patients was 54.77 years. The authors used the Milgram histopathological classification. They evaluated SC localisation, clinical symptoms, diagnostics and treatment (including recurrence incidence) in this cohort. RESULTS: In 31 patients (83.7%) SC affected only the upper joint space in one patient (2.7%) the lower space, and in five patients (13.6%) both spaces. 12 patients (32%) were Milgram Stage 1 (presence of synovial metaplasia without loose bodies), eight patients (22%) were Stage 2 (presence of synovial changes, loose bodies), and 17 patients (46%) were Stage 3 (presence of loose bodies, no synovial changes). Pain was the dominant clinical symptom (32 patients, 86.4%). Treatment consisted of arthroscopy and open surgery. Two patients underwent primary reconstruction and total TMJ replacement. Treatment was successful in 89.2% of cases (33 patients), with four (10.8%) patients suffering recurrence. CONCLUSION: As this patient cohort shows, pain was the dominant symptom in patients with SC. Magnetic resonance imaging is fundamental in the diagnosis of SC, demonstrating pathological findings even in patients for whom an initial X-ray was negative. These were mainly patients with Milgram Stages 1 and 2 without calcification, loose bodies or pathological changes of the bone structures. This is why the authors recommend MRI for any patient experiencing pain for more than three months, and if this reveals an effusion, joint distension or intraarticular soft tissue mass, they will always indicate arthroscopy. Thorough follow-up of patients is recommended, although SC recurrence is not very frequent. The authors recommend follow-up one, three and six months after surgery, and then annually for the first five years after surgery. They recommend follow-up MRI one, two and five years after surgery.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003327
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104248.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10006-024-01273-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38937389
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Vladimír, Machoň $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic
245    10
$a TMJ synovial chondromatosis - an evaluation of 37 patients / $c M. Vladimír, V. Vasilis, H. Dušan, P. Robert, B. Michal, F. René
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The authors evaluated a cohort of 37 patients with histologically verified synovial chondromatosis (SC) between 2013 and 2022. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 37 patients (26 women, 11 men). 36 patients had unilateral involvement, while one patient had bilateral involvement. The average age of the patients was 54.77 years. The authors used the Milgram histopathological classification. They evaluated SC localisation, clinical symptoms, diagnostics and treatment (including recurrence incidence) in this cohort. RESULTS: In 31 patients (83.7%) SC affected only the upper joint space in one patient (2.7%) the lower space, and in five patients (13.6%) both spaces. 12 patients (32%) were Milgram Stage 1 (presence of synovial metaplasia without loose bodies), eight patients (22%) were Stage 2 (presence of synovial changes, loose bodies), and 17 patients (46%) were Stage 3 (presence of loose bodies, no synovial changes). Pain was the dominant clinical symptom (32 patients, 86.4%). Treatment consisted of arthroscopy and open surgery. Two patients underwent primary reconstruction and total TMJ replacement. Treatment was successful in 89.2% of cases (33 patients), with four (10.8%) patients suffering recurrence. CONCLUSION: As this patient cohort shows, pain was the dominant symptom in patients with SC. Magnetic resonance imaging is fundamental in the diagnosis of SC, demonstrating pathological findings even in patients for whom an initial X-ray was negative. These were mainly patients with Milgram Stages 1 and 2 without calcification, loose bodies or pathological changes of the bone structures. This is why the authors recommend MRI for any patient experiencing pain for more than three months, and if this reveals an effusion, joint distension or intraarticular soft tissue mass, they will always indicate arthroscopy. Thorough follow-up of patients is recommended, although SC recurrence is not very frequent. The authors recommend follow-up one, three and six months after surgery, and then annually for the first five years after surgery. They recommend follow-up MRI one, two and five years after surgery.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a chondromatóza synoviální $x chirurgie $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D015838
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a nemoci temporomandibulárního kloubu $x chirurgie $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013705
650    _2
$a artroskopie $7 D001182
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a dopisy $7 D016422
700    1_
$a Vasilis, Vlachopulos $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dušan, Hirjak $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Robert, Plachý $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Michal, Beňo $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic. michal.beno@vfn.cz
700    1_
$a René, Foltán $u Department Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty Hospital Prague Prague, Charles University, Prague U Nemocnice 2 str, Prague 2, Staré Město, 128 08, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00200178 $t Oral and maxillofacial surgery $x 1865-1569 $g Roč. 28, č. 4 (2024), s. 1653-1660
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38937389 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104244 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263222 $s 1239334
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 28 $c 4 $d 1653-1660 $e 20240628 $i 1865-1569 $m Oral and maxillofacial surgery $n Oral Maxillofac Surg $x MED00200178
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...