Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden

P. Maresova, L. Rezny, J. Hruska, B. Klimova, LL. Swanstrom, K. Kuca

. 2024 ; 24 (1) : 1351. [pub] 20241106

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003508

Grantová podpora
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation

BACKGROUND: This study aims to review the existing knowledge on the cost-effectiveness and item costs related to the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients at different stages. METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic search involved several steps: finding and identifying relevant articles, filtering them according to the set criteria, and examining the final number of selected articles to obtain the primary information. The number of articles published between 2013 and September 2024 in the Web of Science and PubMed databases was considered. The CHEERS checklist was used for the risk of bias assessment. Ultimately, 36 studies were included. RESULTS: Regarding the cost-effectiveness of GERD treatment, Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appeared to be the dominant solution for non-refractory patients. However, this might change with the adoption of the novel drug vonoprazan, which is more effective and cheaper. With advancements in emerging technologies, new diagnostic and screening approaches such as Endosheath, Cytosponge, and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring catheters should be considered, with potential implications for optimal GERD management strategies. DISCUSSION: The new diagnostic methods are reliable, safe, and more comfortable than standard procedures. PPIs are commonly used as the first line of treatment for GERD. Surgery, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation or laparoscopic fundoplication, is only recommended for patients with treatment-resistant GERD or severe symptoms. OTHER: Advances in emerging technologies for diagnostics and screening may lead to a shift in the entire GERD treatment model, offering less invasive options and potentially improving patients' quality of life.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003508
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104401.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39501242
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Maresova, Petra $u Betthera s.r.o, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden / $c P. Maresova, L. Rezny, J. Hruska, B. Klimova, LL. Swanstrom, K. Kuca
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: This study aims to review the existing knowledge on the cost-effectiveness and item costs related to the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients at different stages. METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic search involved several steps: finding and identifying relevant articles, filtering them according to the set criteria, and examining the final number of selected articles to obtain the primary information. The number of articles published between 2013 and September 2024 in the Web of Science and PubMed databases was considered. The CHEERS checklist was used for the risk of bias assessment. Ultimately, 36 studies were included. RESULTS: Regarding the cost-effectiveness of GERD treatment, Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appeared to be the dominant solution for non-refractory patients. However, this might change with the adoption of the novel drug vonoprazan, which is more effective and cheaper. With advancements in emerging technologies, new diagnostic and screening approaches such as Endosheath, Cytosponge, and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring catheters should be considered, with potential implications for optimal GERD management strategies. DISCUSSION: The new diagnostic methods are reliable, safe, and more comfortable than standard procedures. PPIs are commonly used as the first line of treatment for GERD. Surgery, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation or laparoscopic fundoplication, is only recommended for patients with treatment-resistant GERD or severe symptoms. OTHER: Advances in emerging technologies for diagnostics and screening may lead to a shift in the entire GERD treatment model, offering less invasive options and potentially improving patients' quality of life.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a gastroezofageální reflux $x diagnóza $x terapie $x ekonomika $x farmakoterapie $7 D005764
650    12
$a analýza nákladů a výnosů $7 D003362
650    12
$a inhibitory protonové pumpy $x terapeutické užití $x ekonomika $7 D054328
650    _2
$a osobní újma zaviněná nemocí $7 D017281
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Rezny, Lukas $u Betthera s.r.o, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hruska, Jan $u Betthera s.r.o, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klimova, Blanka $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Swanstrom, Lee L $u IHU Strasbourg, Innovat Officer & Sci, Strasbourg, France
700    1_
$a Kuca, Kamil $u Betthera s.r.o, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. kamil.kuca@uhk.cz $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. kamil.kuca@uhk.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196641109 $7 xx0041831
773    0_
$w MED00008183 $t BMC health services research $x 1472-6963 $g Roč. 24, č. 1 (2024), s. 1351
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39501242 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104357 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263333 $s 1239515
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 24 $c 1 $d 1351 $e 20241106 $i 1472-6963 $m BMC health services research $n BMC Health Serv Res $x MED00008183
GRA    __
$a grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP $p European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
GRA    __
$a grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP $p European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
GRA    __
$a grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP $p European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
GRA    __
$a grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP $p European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
GRA    __
$a grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP $p European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...