• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project

F. Muehlensiepen, H. Stanze, S. May, K. Stahlhut, C. Helm, HT. Hakam, MM. Bała, TP. Peričić, T. Vrbová, J. Klugarova, R. Prill

. 2024 ; 22 (4) : 345-355. [pub] 20241101

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003720

INTRODUCTION: Advance care planning (ACP) ensures that patients receive medical care aligned with their values, goals, and preferences, especially regarding end-of-life decisions in serious chronic illnesses. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to introduce and promote evidence-based ACP in oncology and palliative care at a midsized hospital near Berlin, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used a mixed methods audit cycle. A baseline audit was conducted using qualitative interviews and workshops with representatives from all the health care disciplines involved in oncology and palliative care at the hospital. The findings were compared with eight best practice recommendations. Targeted strategies aimed at the key stakeholders involved in ACP practice were then implemented. Finally, a semi-quantitative questionnaire was used in a follow-up audit with the same participants as in the baseline audit. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed a high level of familiarity with the concept of ACP. However, there was a lack of a uniformly accepted definition and understanding of ACP among the health care professionals, leading to a lack of coordination in task distribution. The follow-up audit revealed improvements with regard to education and training in ACP (Criterion 1: 50% to 100%) and organizational support to facilitate ACP conversations (Criterion 3: 87.5% to 100%). Other audit criteria compliance rates remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Clinical education and team-based process analysis can facilitate ACP implementation across disciplines in oncology and palliative care facilities. However, the project did not succeed in implementing lasting changes in clinical processes and best practice ACP due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Such an endeavor would demand considerable resources and time, both of which were constrained during the pandemic. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A236.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003720
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104636.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000445 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39036875
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Muehlensiepen, Felix $u Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Rüdersdorf, Germany $u Evidence-Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
245    10
$a Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project / $c F. Muehlensiepen, H. Stanze, S. May, K. Stahlhut, C. Helm, HT. Hakam, MM. Bała, TP. Peričić, T. Vrbová, J. Klugarova, R. Prill
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Advance care planning (ACP) ensures that patients receive medical care aligned with their values, goals, and preferences, especially regarding end-of-life decisions in serious chronic illnesses. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to introduce and promote evidence-based ACP in oncology and palliative care at a midsized hospital near Berlin, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used a mixed methods audit cycle. A baseline audit was conducted using qualitative interviews and workshops with representatives from all the health care disciplines involved in oncology and palliative care at the hospital. The findings were compared with eight best practice recommendations. Targeted strategies aimed at the key stakeholders involved in ACP practice were then implemented. Finally, a semi-quantitative questionnaire was used in a follow-up audit with the same participants as in the baseline audit. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed a high level of familiarity with the concept of ACP. However, there was a lack of a uniformly accepted definition and understanding of ACP among the health care professionals, leading to a lack of coordination in task distribution. The follow-up audit revealed improvements with regard to education and training in ACP (Criterion 1: 50% to 100%) and organizational support to facilitate ACP conversations (Criterion 3: 87.5% to 100%). Other audit criteria compliance rates remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Clinical education and team-based process analysis can facilitate ACP implementation across disciplines in oncology and palliative care facilities. However, the project did not succeed in implementing lasting changes in clinical processes and best practice ACP due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Such an endeavor would demand considerable resources and time, both of which were constrained during the pandemic. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A236.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a předběžné plánování péče $7 D032722
650    12
$a paliativní péče $x organizace a řízení $7 D010166
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x epidemiologie $7 D000086382
650    12
$a lékařská onkologie $7 D008495
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
650    _2
$a pandemie $7 D058873
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe založená na důkazech $7 D055317
650    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Stanze, Henrikje $u Department of Social and Nursing Science, City University of Applied Science Bremen, Bremen, Germany
700    1_
$a May, Susann $u Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Rüdersdorf, Germany
700    1_
$a Stahlhut, Kerstin $u Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany
700    1_
$a Helm, Carolin $u Department of Social and Nursing Science, City University of Applied Science Bremen, Bremen, Germany
700    1_
$a Hakam, Hassan Tarek $u Evidence-Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany $u Center of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
700    1_
$a Bała, Małgorzata M $u Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
700    1_
$a Peričić, Tina Poklepović $u Department of Prosthodontics, Study of Dental Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
700    1_
$a Vrbová, Tereza $u Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Special Education Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klugarova, Jitka $u Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Special Education Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prill, Robert $u Evidence-Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany $u Center of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00210184 $t JBI evidence implementation $x 2691-3321 $g Roč. 22, č. 4 (2024), s. 345-355
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39036875 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104632 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263470 $s 1239727
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 22 $c 4 $d 345-355 $e 20241101 $i 2691-3321 $m JBI evidence implementation $n JBI Evid Implement $x MED00210184
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace