-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence
K. Vlckova, S. Gonella, L. Bavelaar, G. Mitchell, T. Sussman
Jazyk angličtina Země Austrálie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled
Grantová podpora
161462
CIHR - Canada
JPND - EU Joint-Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research
161462
CIHR - Canada
8F19005
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport
733051084
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
JPND-HSC-2018-002
Health Research Board - Ireland
AS-IGF-17-001
Alzheimer's Society - United Kingdom
PubMed
38113927
DOI
10.1111/ijn.13224
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- kvalitativní výzkum * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- péče o umírající * etika MeSH
- výzkumný projekt * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
AIM: This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations. BACKGROUND: Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted. DATA SOURCES: Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022. REVIEW METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data. CONCLUSION: The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Prague The Czech Republic
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino Torino Italy
Center for Palliative Care Prague The Czech Republic
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics University of Torino Torino Italy
Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
School of Nursing and Midwifery Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25004093
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206105127.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 at f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/ijn.13224 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38113927
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a at
- 100 1_
- $a Vlckova, Karolina $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, The Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, The Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320049656 $7 xx0265051
- 245 10
- $a Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence / $c K. Vlckova, S. Gonella, L. Bavelaar, G. Mitchell, T. Sussman
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations. BACKGROUND: Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted. DATA SOURCES: Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022. REVIEW METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data. CONCLUSION: The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
- 650 12
- $a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
- 650 12
- $a péče o umírající $x etika $7 D013727
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Gonella, Silvia $u Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy $u Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino, Torino, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Bavelaar, Laura $u Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Mitchell, Gary $u School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Sussman, Tamara $u School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007208 $t International journal of nursing practice $x 1440-172X $g Roč. 30, č. 5 (2024), s. e13224
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38113927 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206105122 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263693 $s 1240100
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 30 $c 5 $d e13224 $e 20231219 $i 1440-172X $m International journal of nursing practice $n Int J Nurs Pract $x MED00007208
- GRA __
- $a 161462 $p CIHR $2 Canada
- GRA __
- $p JPND - EU Joint-Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research
- GRA __
- $a 161462 $p CIHR $2 Canada
- GRA __
- $a 8F19005 $p Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport
- GRA __
- $a 733051084 $p Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- GRA __
- $a JPND-HSC-2018-002 $p Health Research Board $2 Ireland
- GRA __
- $a AS-IGF-17-001 $p Alzheimer's Society $2 United Kingdom
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121