-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Metoda klinické anamnézy versus tomografie rohovky při odhadování optické mohutnosti rohovky po fotorefrakční operaci
[Clinical history method versus corneal tomographers in estimating corneal power after photorefractive surgery]
Alejandro Tello, Virgilio Galvis, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Ruby Morales, Valeria Otoya, Sylvia J. Villamizar, Sergio E. Serrano
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
PubMed
38925892
DOI
10.31348/2024/23
Meditorial
- Klíčová slova
- optická mohutnost rohovkx,
- MeSH
- fotorefrakční keratektomie MeSH
- lasery excimerové terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- myopie chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování patofyziologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- refrakce oka MeSH
- rohovka * chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování patofyziologie MeSH
- rohovková topografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Aims: To investigate the concordance between the corneal power determined by various approaches with two tomographers (MS-39® and Galilei G6®) and the clinical history method (CHM) in patients undergoing photorefractive surgery with excimer laser for myopic errors. Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing keratorefractive surgery, and having pre- and postoperative keratometries, and tomographies, were included. Results: In 90 eyes, the differences in the power estimated by the CHM and the one determined by four approaches with the corneal tomographers, which included measurements of the posterior cornea, did not show statistically significant differences in their averages. However, the 95% limits of agreement were very wide. After obtaining regression formulas to adjust the values of these four variables, the results of the agreement analysis were similar. Conclusion: Although certain values either directly determined or derived from measurements with the Galilei® and MS-39®corneal tomographers, approximated the estimated value of postoperative corneal power according to the CHM, due to the amplitude of their limits of agreement, these calculations must be taken with care, because they may not be accurate in a given eye.
Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis Floridablanca Colombia
Departament of Ophthalmology Fundacion Oftalmologica de Santander FOSCAL Floridablanca Colombia
Faculty of Health Department of Surgery Universidad Industrial de Santander UIS Bucaramanga Colombia
Research and Development SCHWIND eye tech solutions GmbH Kleinostheim Germany
Clinical history method versus corneal tomographers in estimating corneal power after photorefractive surgery
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25007851
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20251010094300.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250828s2025 xr cd f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.31348/2024/23 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38925892
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Tello, Alejandro $u Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Departament of Ophthalmology, Fundacion Oftalmologica de, Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad, Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Surgery, Universidad Industrial, de Santander UIS, Bucaramanga, Colombia
- 245 10
- $a Metoda klinické anamnézy versus tomografie rohovky při odhadování optické mohutnosti rohovky po fotorefrakční operaci / $c Alejandro Tello, Virgilio Galvis, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Ruby Morales, Valeria Otoya, Sylvia J. Villamizar, Sergio E. Serrano
- 246 31
- $a Clinical history method versus corneal tomographers in estimating corneal power after photorefractive surgery
- 520 9_
- $a Aims: To investigate the concordance between the corneal power determined by various approaches with two tomographers (MS-39® and Galilei G6®) and the clinical history method (CHM) in patients undergoing photorefractive surgery with excimer laser for myopic errors. Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing keratorefractive surgery, and having pre- and postoperative keratometries, and tomographies, were included. Results: In 90 eyes, the differences in the power estimated by the CHM and the one determined by four approaches with the corneal tomographers, which included measurements of the posterior cornea, did not show statistically significant differences in their averages. However, the 95% limits of agreement were very wide. After obtaining regression formulas to adjust the values of these four variables, the results of the agreement analysis were similar. Conclusion: Although certain values either directly determined or derived from measurements with the Galilei® and MS-39®corneal tomographers, approximated the estimated value of postoperative corneal power according to the CHM, due to the amplitude of their limits of agreement, these calculations must be taken with care, because they may not be accurate in a given eye.
- 650 07
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a rohovka $x chirurgie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D003315 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a lasery excimerové $x terapeutické užití $7 D054018 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a myopie $x chirurgie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D009216 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a fotorefrakční keratektomie $7 D018903 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a rohovková topografie $7 D019781 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446 $2 czmesh
- 650 07
- $a refrakce oka $7 D012029 $2 czmesh
- 653 00
- $a optická mohutnost rohovkx
- 700 1_
- $a Galvis, Virgilio $u Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Departament of Ophthalmology, Fundacion Oftalmologica de, Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad, Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia
- 700 1_
- $a Arba-Mosquera, Samuel $u Research and Development, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Morales, Ruby $u ROCOL, Barranquilla, Colombia
- 700 1_
- $a Otoya, Valeria $u Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Departament of Ophthalmology, Fundacion Oftalmologica de, Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad, Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia
- 700 1_
- $a Villamizar, J. Sylvia $u Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Departament of Ophthalmology, Fundacion Oftalmologica de, Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad, Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia
- 700 1_
- $a Serrano, E. Sergio $u Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia $u Faculty of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad, Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010980 $t Česká a slovenská oftalmologie $x 1211-9059 $g Roč. 81, č. 2 (2025), s. 69-80
- 856 41
- $u https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/ceska-slovenska-oftalmologie/2025-2-2/clinical-history-method-versus-corneal-tomographers-in-estimating-corneal-power-after-photorefractive-surgery-137722 $y Meditorial
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 202 $c 639 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250403 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20251010094246 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2392121 $s 1244926
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 81 $c 2 $d 69-80 $i 1211-9059 $m Česká a slovenská oftalmologie $x MED00010980 $y 137722
- LZP __
- $c NLK109 $d 20251001 $b NLK111 $a Meditorial-20250403
