-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The employment of recommended root canal treatment procedures by dentists in Croatia and the Czech Republic
M. Kapitán, J. Schmidt, L. Vavřičková, I. Vidović Zdrilić, J. Vidas Hrstić
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Univerzita Karlova
Sveučilište u Rijeci
PubMed
39813082
DOI
10.1111/iej.14197
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dodržování směrnic statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- terapie kořenového kanálku * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- vzorové postupy ve stomatologii * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- zubní lékaři statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Chorvatsko MeSH
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the compliance of dentists in Croatia and the Czech Republic with endodontic recommendations and identify the subjective and objective factors influencing their adherence to them. METHODOLOGY: A total of 1386 dentists from Croatia and the Czech Republic participated in an online survey through a self-administered, author-designed questionnaire. After excluding those who did not perform root canal treatments (RCT), 1376 responses (394 from Croatia and 982 from the Czech Republic) were statistically analysed. RESULTS: The median age of respondents was 40 years, with a higher proportion of females in both countries. Croatian dentists treated fewer patients weekly but performed more RCTs and placed more composite fillings than their Czech counterparts. Czech dentists more frequently employed magnification devices, rubber dam (RD), pre-endodontic build-ups, nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, irrigant activation, bioceramic sealers, indirect post-endodontic restoration of lateral teeth, and single-visit treatments. These practices were also more common among endodontists than general dental practitioners and other specialists in both countries. Croatian dentists adhered more consistently to the recommended irrigation protocol. In the Czech group, adherence to recommended procedures, such as magnification, RD usage, and irrigation protocol correlated with younger age, smaller weekly number of patients, and preference for treating patients in the supine position. No such correlations were observed among the Croatian dentists. CONCLUSIONS: Despite notable improvements in recent years, dentists still do not fully comply with the recommended RCT working procedures in Croatia and the Czech Republic.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25009372
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134848.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/iej.14197 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39813082
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kapitán, Martin $u Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Dentistry, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277672054 $7 xx0239963
- 245 14
- $a The employment of recommended root canal treatment procedures by dentists in Croatia and the Czech Republic / $c M. Kapitán, J. Schmidt, L. Vavřičková, I. Vidović Zdrilić, J. Vidas Hrstić
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the compliance of dentists in Croatia and the Czech Republic with endodontic recommendations and identify the subjective and objective factors influencing their adherence to them. METHODOLOGY: A total of 1386 dentists from Croatia and the Czech Republic participated in an online survey through a self-administered, author-designed questionnaire. After excluding those who did not perform root canal treatments (RCT), 1376 responses (394 from Croatia and 982 from the Czech Republic) were statistically analysed. RESULTS: The median age of respondents was 40 years, with a higher proportion of females in both countries. Croatian dentists treated fewer patients weekly but performed more RCTs and placed more composite fillings than their Czech counterparts. Czech dentists more frequently employed magnification devices, rubber dam (RD), pre-endodontic build-ups, nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments, irrigant activation, bioceramic sealers, indirect post-endodontic restoration of lateral teeth, and single-visit treatments. These practices were also more common among endodontists than general dental practitioners and other specialists in both countries. Croatian dentists adhered more consistently to the recommended irrigation protocol. In the Czech group, adherence to recommended procedures, such as magnification, RD usage, and irrigation protocol correlated with younger age, smaller weekly number of patients, and preference for treating patients in the supine position. No such correlations were observed among the Croatian dentists. CONCLUSIONS: Despite notable improvements in recent years, dentists still do not fully comply with the recommended RCT working procedures in Croatia and the Czech Republic.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a terapie kořenového kanálku $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012390
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a vzorové postupy ve stomatologii $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D019239
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a dodržování směrnic $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D019983
- 650 _2
- $a zubní lékaři $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003815
- 651 _2
- $a Chorvatsko $7 D017523
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Schmidt, Jan $u Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Dentistry, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000283997111
- 700 1_
- $a Vavřičková, Lenka $u Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Dentistry, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000177068570 $7 xx0105262
- 700 1_
- $a Vidović Zdrilić, Ivana $u Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000276564625
- 700 1_
- $a Vidas Hrstić, Jelena $u Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172785837
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005345 $t International endodontic journal $x 1365-2591 $g Roč. 58, č. 4 (2025), s. 643-657
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39813082 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134844 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311007 $s 1246453
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 58 $c 4 $d 643-657 $e 20250115 $i 1365-2591 $m International endodontic journal $n Int Endod J $x MED00005345
- GRA __
- $p Univerzita Karlova
- GRA __
- $p Sveučilište u Rijeci
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415