-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Direct comparison of PMT and SiPM PET systems using modified NEMA IEC Body phantom
J. Ptáček, P. Karhan, G. Horňák, L. Quinn
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
- MeSH
- fantomy radiodiagnostické * MeSH
- křemík MeSH
- počítačové zpracování obrazu metody MeSH
- pozitronová emisní tomografie * přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the image quality of the Siemens Biograph mCT40 (photomultiplier-based system - PMT) and the Siemens Vision600 (silicon photomultiplier-based system - SiPM) using a modified NEMA IEC Body phantom (Data Spectrum). METHODS: SiPM-based Vision600 has a smaller crystal size (3.2 × 3.2 mm vs. 4.0 × 4.0 mm in the PMT-based mCT40), resulting in better spatial resolution. Enhanced time-of-flight (TOF) timing and higher sensitivity leads to nearly four times higher effective sensitivity. The standard NEMA IEC Body phantom was modified with a 3D-printed holder to accommodate also Hollow and Micro Hollow Spheres of 15.4 mm, 12.4 mm, 7.9 mm, 6.2 mm, 5.0 mm, and 4.0 mm. Each of the three acquisition sessions per scanner included 18 time points and spanned 5.6 half-lives to assess system performance at varying activity concentrations in the field of view. RESULTS: Recovery curves for both systems were similar when identical post-reconstruction filters were applied. The SiPM-based Vision600 system detected smaller sources at significantly lower activity concentrations, and the variations in standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVA50) measurements were generally smaller compared to those of the PMT-based system. The two smallest sources became undetectable below 63 MBq and 16 MBq on the PMT system, versus 20 MBq and 6.5 MBq on the SiPM system. CONCLUSIONS: SiPM technology demonstrated superior performance compared to PMT in detecting small sources in low-activity scenarios and provided more robust quantification results. It is recommended to use averaged SUV metrics, such as SUVA50 or SUVpeak.
Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25009643
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250612125516.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415e20250209it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104919 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39929092
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Ptáček, Jaroslav $u Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic. Electronic address: jaroslav.ptacek@fnol.cz
- 245 10
- $a Direct comparison of PMT and SiPM PET systems using modified NEMA IEC Body phantom / $c J. Ptáček, P. Karhan, G. Horňák, L. Quinn
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the image quality of the Siemens Biograph mCT40 (photomultiplier-based system - PMT) and the Siemens Vision600 (silicon photomultiplier-based system - SiPM) using a modified NEMA IEC Body phantom (Data Spectrum). METHODS: SiPM-based Vision600 has a smaller crystal size (3.2 × 3.2 mm vs. 4.0 × 4.0 mm in the PMT-based mCT40), resulting in better spatial resolution. Enhanced time-of-flight (TOF) timing and higher sensitivity leads to nearly four times higher effective sensitivity. The standard NEMA IEC Body phantom was modified with a 3D-printed holder to accommodate also Hollow and Micro Hollow Spheres of 15.4 mm, 12.4 mm, 7.9 mm, 6.2 mm, 5.0 mm, and 4.0 mm. Each of the three acquisition sessions per scanner included 18 time points and spanned 5.6 half-lives to assess system performance at varying activity concentrations in the field of view. RESULTS: Recovery curves for both systems were similar when identical post-reconstruction filters were applied. The SiPM-based Vision600 system detected smaller sources at significantly lower activity concentrations, and the variations in standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVA50) measurements were generally smaller compared to those of the PMT-based system. The two smallest sources became undetectable below 63 MBq and 16 MBq on the PMT system, versus 20 MBq and 6.5 MBq on the SiPM system. CONCLUSIONS: SiPM technology demonstrated superior performance compared to PMT in detecting small sources in low-activity scenarios and provided more robust quantification results. It is recommended to use averaged SUV metrics, such as SUVA50 or SUVpeak.
- 650 12
- $a fantomy radiodiagnostické $7 D019047
- 650 12
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
- 650 _2
- $a křemík $7 D012825
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Karhan, Pavel $u Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horňák, Gregor $u Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic $7 xx0333185
- 700 1_
- $a Quinn, Libuše $u Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167391 $t Physica medica $x 1724-191X $g Roč. 131 (20250209), s. 104919
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39929092 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250612125507 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311174 $s 1246724
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 131 $c - $d 104919 $e 20250209 $i 1724-191X $m Physica medica $n Phys Med $x MED00167391
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415