• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data in evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol

TH. Barker, GM. McBride, A. Ross-White, D. Pollock, C. Stern, S. Hasanoff, R. Kanukula, M. Dias, A. Scott, E. Aromataris, A. Whitehorn, JC. Stone, L. Shamseer, P. Palmieri, M. Klugar, Z. Munn

. 2025 ; 23 (3) : 536-545. [pub] 20240910

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25009765

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify, catalogue, and characterize previously reported tools, techniques, methods, and processes that have been recommended or used by evidence synthesizers to detect fraudulent or erroneous data and mitigate its impact. INTRODUCTION: Decision-making for policy and practice should always be underpinned by the best available evidence-typically peer-reviewed scientific literature. Evidence synthesis literature should be collated and organized using the appropriate evidence synthesis methodology, best exemplified by the role systematic reviews play in evidence-based health care. However, with the rise of "predatory journals," fraudulent or erroneous data may be invading this literature, which may negatively affect evidence syntheses that use this data. This, in turn, may compromise decision-making processes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include peer-reviewed articles, commentaries, books, and editorials that describe at least 1 tool, technique, method, or process with the explicit purpose of identifying or mitigating the impact of fraudulent or erroneous data for any evidence synthesis, in any topic area. Manuals, handbooks, and guidance from major organizations, universities, and libraries will also be considered. METHODS: This review will be conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases and relevant organizational websites will be searched for eligible studies. Title and abstract, and, subsequently, full-text screening will be conducted in duplicate. Data from identified full texts will be extracted using a pre-determined checklist, while the findings will be summarized descriptively and presented in tables. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/u8yrn.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25009765
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429135522.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.11124/JBIES-24-00167 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39252571
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Barker, Timothy Hugh $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/000000026897814
245    10
$a Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data in evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol / $c TH. Barker, GM. McBride, A. Ross-White, D. Pollock, C. Stern, S. Hasanoff, R. Kanukula, M. Dias, A. Scott, E. Aromataris, A. Whitehorn, JC. Stone, L. Shamseer, P. Palmieri, M. Klugar, Z. Munn
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify, catalogue, and characterize previously reported tools, techniques, methods, and processes that have been recommended or used by evidence synthesizers to detect fraudulent or erroneous data and mitigate its impact. INTRODUCTION: Decision-making for policy and practice should always be underpinned by the best available evidence-typically peer-reviewed scientific literature. Evidence synthesis literature should be collated and organized using the appropriate evidence synthesis methodology, best exemplified by the role systematic reviews play in evidence-based health care. However, with the rise of "predatory journals," fraudulent or erroneous data may be invading this literature, which may negatively affect evidence syntheses that use this data. This, in turn, may compromise decision-making processes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include peer-reviewed articles, commentaries, books, and editorials that describe at least 1 tool, technique, method, or process with the explicit purpose of identifying or mitigating the impact of fraudulent or erroneous data for any evidence synthesis, in any topic area. Manuals, handbooks, and guidance from major organizations, universities, and libraries will also be considered. METHODS: This review will be conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases and relevant organizational websites will be searched for eligible studies. Title and abstract, and, subsequently, full-text screening will be conducted in duplicate. Data from identified full texts will be extracted using a pre-determined checklist, while the findings will be summarized descriptively and presented in tables. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/u8yrn.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a vědecký podvod $7 D015871
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $x normy $7 D012107
650    _2
$a systematický přehled jako téma $7 D000078202
650    _2
$a podvod $x prevence a kontrola $7 D005607
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a McBride, Grace McKenzie $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/000000026260098
700    1_
$a Ross-White, Amanda $u Queen's University Library, Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality (QcHcQ), Kingston, ON, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000347370968
700    1_
$a Pollock, Danielle $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000266040609
700    1_
$a Stern, Cindy $u JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000209245042
700    1_
$a Hasanoff, Sabira $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172460485
700    1_
$a Kanukula, Raju $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/000000030793786
700    1_
$a Dias, Mafalda $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
700    1_
$a Scott, Anna $u Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
700    1_
$a Aromataris, Edoardo $u JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172385833
700    1_
$a Whitehorn, Ashley $u JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000212555279
700    1_
$a Stone, Jennifer C $u JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000237876175
700    1_
$a Shamseer, Larissa $u Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000336903378
700    1_
$a Palmieri, Patrick $u EBHC South America, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru $u School of Nursing, Excelsior University, New York, NY, USA $u College of Graduate Health Studies, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MI, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000207650239
700    1_
$a Klugar, Miloslav $u Cochrane Czech Republic, The Czech Republic: JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Faculty of Education, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228047295 $7 mzk2015879957
700    1_
$a Munn, Zachary $u Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000270915842
773    0_
$w MED00207800 $t JBI evidence synthesis $x 2689-8381 $g Roč. 23, č. 3 (2025), s. 536-545
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39252571 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429135518 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311253 $s 1246846
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 23 $c 3 $d 536-545 $e 20240910 $i 2689-8381 $m JBI evidence synthesis $n JBI Evid Synth $x MED00207800
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace