• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Impact of the type of vaginal assisted delivery on the pelvic floor and OASI - Ultrasound study

J. Dvorak, R. Poncova, T. Fucik, HP. Dietz, J. Masata, A. Martan, K. Svabik

. 2025 ; 305 (-) : 142-146. [pub] 20241216

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25010061

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma in women after assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: Retrospective study on 201 primiparous women after assisted vaginal delivery, control group 43 women after normal vaginal delivery. 4D translabial ultrasound examination of the levator ani and the anal sphincter was performed according to standard methodology at least 3 months postpartum. Ultrasound classification of trauma was performed by two independent evaluators blinded to clinical data. A third evaluator was asked to confirm findings in case of discrepancy. RESULTS: The LAM avulsion rate for normal delivery was 20.9%, for forceps 60%, for vacuum extraction 21.7% Odds ratio for forceps vs. NVD was 4.32 (1.69, 11.01), for vacuum vs. NVD 0.98 (0.409, 2.327). Ultrasound OASI rate was 33.3% for Forceps and 30.50% for Vacuum. This equated to an OR of 1.78 (0.85 - 3.10) for Forceps and 1.62 (0.85-3.10) for Vacuum relative to NVD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm forceps as the major risk factor for levator avulsion. Forceps also implies a non-significantly higher risk of OASI compared to NVD.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010061
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134610.0
007      
ta
008      
250415e20241216ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.023 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39701008
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Dvorak, Jan $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jan.dvorak2@vfn.cz
245    10
$a Impact of the type of vaginal assisted delivery on the pelvic floor and OASI - Ultrasound study / $c J. Dvorak, R. Poncova, T. Fucik, HP. Dietz, J. Masata, A. Martan, K. Svabik
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma in women after assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: Retrospective study on 201 primiparous women after assisted vaginal delivery, control group 43 women after normal vaginal delivery. 4D translabial ultrasound examination of the levator ani and the anal sphincter was performed according to standard methodology at least 3 months postpartum. Ultrasound classification of trauma was performed by two independent evaluators blinded to clinical data. A third evaluator was asked to confirm findings in case of discrepancy. RESULTS: The LAM avulsion rate for normal delivery was 20.9%, for forceps 60%, for vacuum extraction 21.7% Odds ratio for forceps vs. NVD was 4.32 (1.69, 11.01), for vacuum vs. NVD 0.98 (0.409, 2.327). Ultrasound OASI rate was 33.3% for Forceps and 30.50% for Vacuum. This equated to an OR of 1.78 (0.85 - 3.10) for Forceps and 1.62 (0.85-3.10) for Vacuum relative to NVD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm forceps as the major risk factor for levator avulsion. Forceps also implies a non-significantly higher risk of OASI compared to NVD.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a pánevní dno $x diagnostické zobrazování $x zranění $7 D017773
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a anální kanál $x zranění $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001003
650    12
$a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
650    12
$a vakuová extrakce porodnická $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014620
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a porodnické kleště $x škodlivé účinky $7 D009772
650    _2
$a vedení porodu $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D036861
650    _2
$a extrakce porodnická $x škodlivé účinky $7 D005113
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Poncova, Renata $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fucik, Tomas $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dietz, Hans Peter $u Sydney Urodynamic Centres, Penrith, NSW, Australia
700    1_
$a Masata, Jaromir $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Martan, Alois $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svabik, Kamil $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 305 (20241216), s. 142-146
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39701008 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134605 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311432 $s 1247142
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 305 $c - $d 142-146 $e 20241216 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...