-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Impact of the type of vaginal assisted delivery on the pelvic floor and OASI - Ultrasound study
J. Dvorak, R. Poncova, T. Fucik, HP. Dietz, J. Masata, A. Martan, K. Svabik
Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- anální kanál * zranění diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- extrakce porodnická škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pánevní dno * diagnostické zobrazování zranění MeSH
- porodnické kleště škodlivé účinky MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ultrasonografie * metody MeSH
- vakuová extrakce porodnická * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- vedení porodu škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma in women after assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: Retrospective study on 201 primiparous women after assisted vaginal delivery, control group 43 women after normal vaginal delivery. 4D translabial ultrasound examination of the levator ani and the anal sphincter was performed according to standard methodology at least 3 months postpartum. Ultrasound classification of trauma was performed by two independent evaluators blinded to clinical data. A third evaluator was asked to confirm findings in case of discrepancy. RESULTS: The LAM avulsion rate for normal delivery was 20.9%, for forceps 60%, for vacuum extraction 21.7% Odds ratio for forceps vs. NVD was 4.32 (1.69, 11.01), for vacuum vs. NVD 0.98 (0.409, 2.327). Ultrasound OASI rate was 33.3% for Forceps and 30.50% for Vacuum. This equated to an OR of 1.78 (0.85 - 3.10) for Forceps and 1.62 (0.85-3.10) for Vacuum relative to NVD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm forceps as the major risk factor for levator avulsion. Forceps also implies a non-significantly higher risk of OASI compared to NVD.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010061
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134610.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415e20241216ie f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39701008
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Dvorak, Jan $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jan.dvorak2@vfn.cz
- 245 10
- $a Impact of the type of vaginal assisted delivery on the pelvic floor and OASI - Ultrasound study / $c J. Dvorak, R. Poncova, T. Fucik, HP. Dietz, J. Masata, A. Martan, K. Svabik
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma in women after assisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: Retrospective study on 201 primiparous women after assisted vaginal delivery, control group 43 women after normal vaginal delivery. 4D translabial ultrasound examination of the levator ani and the anal sphincter was performed according to standard methodology at least 3 months postpartum. Ultrasound classification of trauma was performed by two independent evaluators blinded to clinical data. A third evaluator was asked to confirm findings in case of discrepancy. RESULTS: The LAM avulsion rate for normal delivery was 20.9%, for forceps 60%, for vacuum extraction 21.7% Odds ratio for forceps vs. NVD was 4.32 (1.69, 11.01), for vacuum vs. NVD 0.98 (0.409, 2.327). Ultrasound OASI rate was 33.3% for Forceps and 30.50% for Vacuum. This equated to an OR of 1.78 (0.85 - 3.10) for Forceps and 1.62 (0.85-3.10) for Vacuum relative to NVD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm forceps as the major risk factor for levator avulsion. Forceps also implies a non-significantly higher risk of OASI compared to NVD.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a pánevní dno $x diagnostické zobrazování $x zranění $7 D017773
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a anální kanál $x zranění $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001003
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
- 650 12
- $a vakuová extrakce porodnická $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014620
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a porodnické kleště $x škodlivé účinky $7 D009772
- 650 _2
- $a vedení porodu $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D036861
- 650 _2
- $a extrakce porodnická $x škodlivé účinky $7 D005113
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Poncova, Renata $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fucik, Tomas $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dietz, Hans Peter $u Sydney Urodynamic Centres, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Masata, Jaromir $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Martan, Alois $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Svabik, Kamil $u Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 305 (20241216), s. 142-146
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39701008 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134605 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311432 $s 1247142
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 305 $c - $d 142-146 $e 20241216 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415