-
Something wrong with this record ?
Assessing PFAS in drinking water: Insights from the Czech Republic's risk-based monitoring approach
F. Kozisek, D. Dvorakova, F. Kotal, H. Jeligova, L. Mayerova, V. Svobodova, M. Jurikova, V. Gomersall, J. Pulkrabova
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical * analysis MeSH
- Solid Phase Extraction MeSH
- Fluorocarbons * analysis MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring * methods MeSH
- Drinking Water * chemistry MeSH
- Tandem Mass Spectrometry MeSH
- Environmental Exposure analysis statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n = 27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n = 21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010063
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134632.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415e20241226enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143969 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39694288
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kozisek, Frantisek $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Assessing PFAS in drinking water: Insights from the Czech Republic's risk-based monitoring approach / $c F. Kozisek, D. Dvorakova, F. Kotal, H. Jeligova, L. Mayerova, V. Svobodova, M. Jurikova, V. Gomersall, J. Pulkrabova
- 520 9_
- $a This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n = 27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n = 21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.
- 650 12
- $a fluorokarbony $x analýza $7 D005466
- 650 12
- $a pitná voda $x chemie $7 D060766
- 650 12
- $a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $7 D014874
- 650 12
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a extrakce na pevné fázi $7 D052616
- 650 _2
- $a tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D053719
- 650 _2
- $a vystavení vlivu životního prostředí $x analýza $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004781
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dvorakova, Darina $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: darina.dvorakova@vscht.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Kotal, Filip $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jeligova, Hana $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mayerova, Lenka $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodova, Veronika $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jurikova, Martina $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gomersall, Veronika $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pulkrabova, Jana $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 370 (20241226), s. 143969
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39694288 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134627 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311433 $s 1247144
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 370 $c - $d 143969 $e 20241226 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415