• Something wrong with this record ?

Assessing PFAS in drinking water: Insights from the Czech Republic's risk-based monitoring approach

F. Kozisek, D. Dvorakova, F. Kotal, H. Jeligova, L. Mayerova, V. Svobodova, M. Jurikova, V. Gomersall, J. Pulkrabova

. 2025 ; 370 (-) : 143969. [pub] 20241226

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n = 27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n = 21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010063
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134632.0
007      
ta
008      
250415e20241226enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143969 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39694288
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kozisek, Frantisek $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Assessing PFAS in drinking water: Insights from the Czech Republic's risk-based monitoring approach / $c F. Kozisek, D. Dvorakova, F. Kotal, H. Jeligova, L. Mayerova, V. Svobodova, M. Jurikova, V. Gomersall, J. Pulkrabova
520    9_
$a This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n = 27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n = 21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.
650    12
$a fluorokarbony $x analýza $7 D005466
650    12
$a pitná voda $x chemie $7 D060766
650    12
$a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $7 D014874
650    12
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a extrakce na pevné fázi $7 D052616
650    _2
$a tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D053719
650    _2
$a vystavení vlivu životního prostředí $x analýza $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004781
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dvorakova, Darina $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: darina.dvorakova@vscht.cz
700    1_
$a Kotal, Filip $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jeligova, Hana $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mayerova, Lenka $u National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svobodova, Veronika $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jurikova, Martina $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gomersall, Veronika $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pulkrabova, Jana $u University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 370 (20241226), s. 143969
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39694288 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134627 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311433 $s 1247144
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 370 $c - $d 143969 $e 20241226 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...