Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Prevalence of dietary supplement use among the military population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

R. Molani-Gol, M. Rafraf, B. Alipour

. 2025 ; 33 (1) : 36-48. [pub] -

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online Full text

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2004
ProQuest Central from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources from 1993

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate widespread dietary supplements (DSs) use among the military population. There is no recent study to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of DS use among the military population. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to present an overview and estimate of the overall prevalence of DSs use among the military population. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to September 2023 using relevant keywords. All original articles written in English evaluating the prevalence of DSs use among the military population were eligible for this study. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. The meta-analysis was performed utilizing a random-effects model and STATA software. RESULTS: In total, 32 cross-sectional studies were included in this review. The prevalence rate of DS use in the overall military population was 57% (95% CI: 49-64); this rate was higher in the studies that were carried out in the USA and the studies with a sample size lower than 10,000 members. Eleven studies reported adverse effects (AEs) following DSs use in the military population, the pooled effect size of them was 13.0% (95% CI: 6-20). The most common AEs reported by military personnel were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea, however, they did not include any serious complications. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that the prevalence of DSs use among the military personnel was high. Moreover, some studies reported AEs following DSs use such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Promotion of knowledge and informed attitudes regarding the DSs use in the military population could be useful.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25011617
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250521143013.0
007      
ta
008      
250506s2025 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a8321 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40293828
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Molani-Gol, Roghayeh $u Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran $u Department of Community Nutrition, Nutrition Research Centre, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
245    10
$a Prevalence of dietary supplement use among the military population: a systematic review and meta-analysis / $c R. Molani-Gol, M. Rafraf, B. Alipour
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate widespread dietary supplements (DSs) use among the military population. There is no recent study to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of DS use among the military population. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to present an overview and estimate of the overall prevalence of DSs use among the military population. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to September 2023 using relevant keywords. All original articles written in English evaluating the prevalence of DSs use among the military population were eligible for this study. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. The meta-analysis was performed utilizing a random-effects model and STATA software. RESULTS: In total, 32 cross-sectional studies were included in this review. The prevalence rate of DS use in the overall military population was 57% (95% CI: 49-64); this rate was higher in the studies that were carried out in the USA and the studies with a sample size lower than 10,000 members. Eleven studies reported adverse effects (AEs) following DSs use in the military population, the pooled effect size of them was 13.0% (95% CI: 6-20). The most common AEs reported by military personnel were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea, however, they did not include any serious complications. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that the prevalence of DSs use among the military personnel was high. Moreover, some studies reported AEs following DSs use such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Promotion of knowledge and informed attitudes regarding the DSs use in the military population could be useful.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ozbrojené síly $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008889
650    12
$a potravní doplňky $x statistika a číselné údaje $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019587
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
700    1_
$a Rafraf, Maryam $u Department of Community Nutrition, Nutrition Research Centre, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
700    1_
$a Alipour, Beitullah $u Department of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 33, č. 1 (2025), s. 36-48
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40293828 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20250506 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250521143011 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2324868 $s 1248707
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 33 $c 1 $d 36-48 $e - $i 1210-7778 $m Central European journal of public health $n Cent Eur J Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$b NLK116 $a Pubmed-20250506

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...