• Something wrong with this record ?

Development of point-of-need colourimetric, isothermal diagnostic assays for specific detection of Bacillus subtilis using shikimate dehydrogenase gene

N. S, M. C, SK. T, RR. S, K. A, PM. K, P. D, SS. N

. 2025 ; 70 (2) : 463-473. [pub] 20240927

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

The largest obstacle in the promotion of biopesticides is the existence of counterfeit products available in the market. Identification and quantification of antagonistic organisms in biopesticide products are the key to the reduction of spurious microbial pesticides. In this study, we have developed a simple, sensitive, isothermal-based colourimetric assay for specific detection of Bacillus subtilis from the biopesticide formulations and soil samples. A region specific to B. subtilis which codes for shikimate dehydrogenase was identified through in silico analysis. We employed conventional PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and qPCR for specific detection of B. subtilis in soil samples and biopesticide formulations. Specificity tests showed that the PCR primers amplified an amplicon of 521 bp in four strains of B. subtilis only, and no amplification was found in negative control samples. Similarly, the LAMP assay showed sky blue colour in all four strains of B. subtilis and violet colour in negative control samples. Whereas in the RPA assay, upon the addition of SYBR Green dye, a bright green colour was seen in B. subtilis strains, while a brick-red colour was observed in negative control samples by visualizing under a UV transilluminator. The qPCR assay showed specific amplifications with a Ct value of 12 for B. subtilis strains and no amplification in negative control samples. In the sensitivity test, PCR could amplify DNA of B. subtilis up to 500 pg/μL. DNA concentration as low as 10 pg/μL was enough to show the colour change in the LAMP as well as the RPA assays, whereas the qPCR assay showed sensitivity till 100 pg/μL. All four diagnostic assays developed in the study have been validated in soil samples and B. subtilis-based biopesticides. Compared to conventional PCR, the qPCR assay has the advantage of quantification and visualizing the result in real-time, whereas LAMP and RPA assays have the benefits of being colourimetric and less time-consuming. The other advantages are that the results can be visualized with the naked eye, and these assays do not require a costly thermal cycler and gel documentation system. Hence, LAMP and RPA assays are highly suitable for developing point-of-need diagnostic kits and, in turn, help regulators assess the quality of biopesticides in the market.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25013011
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250605092907.0
007      
ta
008      
250605s2025 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-024-01201-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39331280
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a S, Nanditha $u Department of Biotechnology, Jain University, Bengaluru, 560 027, India $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India
245    10
$a Development of point-of-need colourimetric, isothermal diagnostic assays for specific detection of Bacillus subtilis using shikimate dehydrogenase gene / $c N. S, M. C, SK. T, RR. S, K. A, PM. K, P. D, SS. N
520    9_
$a The largest obstacle in the promotion of biopesticides is the existence of counterfeit products available in the market. Identification and quantification of antagonistic organisms in biopesticide products are the key to the reduction of spurious microbial pesticides. In this study, we have developed a simple, sensitive, isothermal-based colourimetric assay for specific detection of Bacillus subtilis from the biopesticide formulations and soil samples. A region specific to B. subtilis which codes for shikimate dehydrogenase was identified through in silico analysis. We employed conventional PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and qPCR for specific detection of B. subtilis in soil samples and biopesticide formulations. Specificity tests showed that the PCR primers amplified an amplicon of 521 bp in four strains of B. subtilis only, and no amplification was found in negative control samples. Similarly, the LAMP assay showed sky blue colour in all four strains of B. subtilis and violet colour in negative control samples. Whereas in the RPA assay, upon the addition of SYBR Green dye, a bright green colour was seen in B. subtilis strains, while a brick-red colour was observed in negative control samples by visualizing under a UV transilluminator. The qPCR assay showed specific amplifications with a Ct value of 12 for B. subtilis strains and no amplification in negative control samples. In the sensitivity test, PCR could amplify DNA of B. subtilis up to 500 pg/μL. DNA concentration as low as 10 pg/μL was enough to show the colour change in the LAMP as well as the RPA assays, whereas the qPCR assay showed sensitivity till 100 pg/μL. All four diagnostic assays developed in the study have been validated in soil samples and B. subtilis-based biopesticides. Compared to conventional PCR, the qPCR assay has the advantage of quantification and visualizing the result in real-time, whereas LAMP and RPA assays have the benefits of being colourimetric and less time-consuming. The other advantages are that the results can be visualized with the naked eye, and these assays do not require a costly thermal cycler and gel documentation system. Hence, LAMP and RPA assays are highly suitable for developing point-of-need diagnostic kits and, in turn, help regulators assess the quality of biopesticides in the market.
650    12
$a Bacillus subtilis $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $x enzymologie $7 D001412
650    12
$a techniky amplifikace nukleových kyselin $x metody $7 D021141
650    12
$a kolorimetrie $x metody $7 D003124
650    12
$a alkoholoxidoreduktasy $x genetika $7 D000429
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    12
$a diagnostické techniky molekulární $x metody $7 D025202
650    _2
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
650    _2
$a bakteriální proteiny $x genetika $7 D001426
650    _2
$a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a C, Manjunatha $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India. manjunatha.c@icar.gov.in $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228128503
700    1_
$a T, Shivakumara K $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India
700    1_
$a S, Ramya R $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India
700    1_
$a A, Kandan $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India
700    1_
$a K, Prasannakumar M $u Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560 065, India
700    1_
$a D, Pramesh $u Agricultural Research Station, Gangavathi, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, 583 227, India
700    1_
$a N, Sushil S $u Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 560 024, India
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 70, č. 2 (2025), s. 463-473
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39331280 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250605 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250605092901 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2333588 $s 1250121
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 70 $c 2 $d 463-473 $e 20240927 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia Microbiol (Praha) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250605

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...