-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
[18 F]-Fluoroestradiol PET (FES-PET) and [18 F] Flurodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) Imaging May Aid in Managing Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Lobular Breast Cancer
PM. Manohar, LM. Peterson, IC. Jenkins, QV. Wu, BF. Kurland, A. Novakova-Jiresova, M. Muzi, DL. Chen, JM. Specht, S. Dintzis, PE. Kinahan, DA. Mankoff, HM. Linden
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
R50 CA211270
NCI NIH HHS - United States
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- estradiol * analogy a deriváty chemie MeSH
- fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 * chemie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lobulární karcinom * diagnostické zobrazování terapie patologie MeSH
- metastázy nádorů MeSH
- nádory prsu * diagnostické zobrazování patologie terapie MeSH
- pozitronová emisní tomografie * metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIM: This study examines the combination of FES-PET and FDG-PET as complementary imaging for detection of metastatic ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated FES and FDG uptake in patients with metastatic ILC from an estrogen receptor (ER) positive primary tumor. We classified lesions into three categories (FES high/FDG low, FES high/FDG high, FES low/FDG low) using SUVmax cut-off values of 1.5 for FES and 5.0 for FDG. Qualitative evaluation included examination of the difference in the extent of disease between FES and FDG. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 82% had FES uptake in all tumor sites identified by FDG, with 18% lacking FES uptake in at least one lesion. Mean (range) SUVmax for FES and FDG was 4.0 (0.67-10.6) and 4.6 (1.3-12.5), respectively. The majority of ILC patients (25/38), had lesions with FES high/FDG low uptake, consistent with the strongly ER + indolent nature of ILC. Patients with disease classified as FES high/FDG low had longer median overall survival (OS) (3.2 years) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.5 years) than FES high/FDG high (OS = 2.1 years and PFS = 0.46 years). The median overall OS for all patients was 3.0 years (95% CI 2.5, 4.8) and PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI 0.6, 2.5). 8 patients (21%) had qualitatively more extensive disease by FES-PET. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both FES-PET and FDG-PET can identify metastatic ILC and be useful in detecting the pattern and extent of disease. The imaging combination provides additional information for prognosis and clinical decision making, balancing suitability for endocrine therapy and aggressiveness/indolence of disease.
Charles University and Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center FHCC 1144 Eastlake Seattle WA 98109 1023 USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25015435
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731090956.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s11307-025-02015-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40369385
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Manohar, Poorni M $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 245 10
- $a [18 F]-Fluoroestradiol PET (FES-PET) and [18 F] Flurodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) Imaging May Aid in Managing Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Lobular Breast Cancer / $c PM. Manohar, LM. Peterson, IC. Jenkins, QV. Wu, BF. Kurland, A. Novakova-Jiresova, M. Muzi, DL. Chen, JM. Specht, S. Dintzis, PE. Kinahan, DA. Mankoff, HM. Linden
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: This study examines the combination of FES-PET and FDG-PET as complementary imaging for detection of metastatic ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated FES and FDG uptake in patients with metastatic ILC from an estrogen receptor (ER) positive primary tumor. We classified lesions into three categories (FES high/FDG low, FES high/FDG high, FES low/FDG low) using SUVmax cut-off values of 1.5 for FES and 5.0 for FDG. Qualitative evaluation included examination of the difference in the extent of disease between FES and FDG. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 82% had FES uptake in all tumor sites identified by FDG, with 18% lacking FES uptake in at least one lesion. Mean (range) SUVmax for FES and FDG was 4.0 (0.67-10.6) and 4.6 (1.3-12.5), respectively. The majority of ILC patients (25/38), had lesions with FES high/FDG low uptake, consistent with the strongly ER + indolent nature of ILC. Patients with disease classified as FES high/FDG low had longer median overall survival (OS) (3.2 years) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.5 years) than FES high/FDG high (OS = 2.1 years and PFS = 0.46 years). The median overall OS for all patients was 3.0 years (95% CI 2.5, 4.8) and PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI 0.6, 2.5). 8 patients (21%) had qualitatively more extensive disease by FES-PET. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both FES-PET and FDG-PET can identify metastatic ILC and be useful in detecting the pattern and extent of disease. The imaging combination provides additional information for prognosis and clinical decision making, balancing suitability for endocrine therapy and aggressiveness/indolence of disease.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 $x chemie $7 D019788
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory prsu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x terapie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x metody $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a estradiol $x analogy a deriváty $x chemie $7 D004958
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 12
- $a lobulární karcinom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $x patologie $7 D018275
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Peterson, Lanell M $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. lanell@uw.edu $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA. lanell@uw.edu $1 https://orcid.org/0000000216135909
- 700 1_
- $a Jenkins, Isaac C $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Wu, Qian Vicky $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Kurland, Brenda F $u GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Novakova-Jiresova, Alena $u Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Muzi, Mark $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Delphine L $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Specht, Jennifer M $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Dintzis, Suzanne $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Kinahan, Paul E $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Mankoff, David A $u University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Linden, Hannah M $u University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA $u Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, FHCC 1144 Eastlake (LG-200), Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008643 $t Molecular imaging and biology $x 1860-2002 $g Roč. 27, č. 3 (2025), s. 410-420
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40369385 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731090950 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366330 $s 1252560
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 27 $c 3 $d 410-420 $e 20250514 $i 1860-2002 $m Molecular imaging and biology $n Mol Imaging Biol $x MED00008643
- GRA __
- $a R50 CA211270 $p NCI NIH HHS $2 United States
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708