• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality for abdominal CT exams using photon-counting and energy-integrating CT: A self-controlled study including optimized patient positioning

L. Sukupova

. 2025 ; 31 (3) : 102909. [pub] 20250313

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015919

INTRODUCTION: Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents a major advancement in CT imaging, offering improved image quality and reduced radiation dose compared to traditional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. This study compared image quality and radiation dose using a self-controlled approach, while evaluating the impact of patient positioning. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 200 patients who underwent abdominal CT scans on both EID (Somatom Definition Flash) and PCD (Naeotom Alpha) scanners. After applying inclusion criteria for proper positioning (within ±20 mm) and stable anatomical conditions, 119 patients were included. Radiation doses were assessed using CTDIvol, and image quality was evaluated via CT numbers, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR to dose (SNRD), and contrast-to-noise ratio to dose (CNRD). RESULTS: The study found a median radiation dose reduction of 37 % with PCD CT compared to EID CT (p < 0.05). Image quality assessments revealed significant improvements with PCD CT, including reduced noise levels (up to 31 % in contrast-enhanced organs) and enhanced SNRD (33-51 % increase). CNRD improved by 60-76 %, indicating superior imaging performance of PCD CT. However, 36 % of patients on EID were positioned outside the ±20 mm range, which could adversely affect image quality and radiation dose, underscoring the need for more precise patient positioning. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that PCD CT achieves substantial reductions in radiation dose while enhancing image quality. However, accurate patient positioning is crucial to fully optimize these benefits. Automated tools that ensure proper positioning may be necessary to consistently maintain image quality and reduce radiation exposure. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: PCD CT offers improved patient safety and diagnostic imaging. Automated positioning tools are essential to optimize and consistently maintain image quality and minimize radiation exposure.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015919
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091346.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102909 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40086170
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Sukupova, L $u Division of the Director, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Lucie.sukupova@ikem.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of radiation dose and image quality for abdominal CT exams using photon-counting and energy-integrating CT: A self-controlled study including optimized patient positioning / $c L. Sukupova
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents a major advancement in CT imaging, offering improved image quality and reduced radiation dose compared to traditional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. This study compared image quality and radiation dose using a self-controlled approach, while evaluating the impact of patient positioning. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 200 patients who underwent abdominal CT scans on both EID (Somatom Definition Flash) and PCD (Naeotom Alpha) scanners. After applying inclusion criteria for proper positioning (within ±20 mm) and stable anatomical conditions, 119 patients were included. Radiation doses were assessed using CTDIvol, and image quality was evaluated via CT numbers, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR to dose (SNRD), and contrast-to-noise ratio to dose (CNRD). RESULTS: The study found a median radiation dose reduction of 37 % with PCD CT compared to EID CT (p < 0.05). Image quality assessments revealed significant improvements with PCD CT, including reduced noise levels (up to 31 % in contrast-enhanced organs) and enhanced SNRD (33-51 % increase). CNRD improved by 60-76 %, indicating superior imaging performance of PCD CT. However, 36 % of patients on EID were positioned outside the ±20 mm range, which could adversely affect image quality and radiation dose, underscoring the need for more precise patient positioning. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that PCD CT achieves substantial reductions in radiation dose while enhancing image quality. However, accurate patient positioning is crucial to fully optimize these benefits. Automated tools that ensure proper positioning may be necessary to consistently maintain image quality and reduce radiation exposure. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: PCD CT offers improved patient safety and diagnostic imaging. Automated positioning tools are essential to optimize and consistently maintain image quality and minimize radiation exposure.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a polohování pacienta $x metody $7 D056888
650    12
$a dávka záření $7 D011829
650    12
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a rentgendiagnostika břicha $x metody $7 D011860
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a poměr signál - šum $7 D059629
650    _2
$a fotony $7 D017785
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
773    0_
$w MED00167436 $t Radiography $x 1532-2831 $g Roč. 31, č. 3 (2025), s. 102909
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40086170 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091340 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366632 $s 1253044
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 31 $c 3 $d 102909 $e 20250313 $i 1532-2831 $m Radiography $n Radiography (Lond) $x MED00167436
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...