• Something wrong with this record ?

Targeted ablation of epicardial ganglionated plexi during cardiac surgery with pulsed field electroporation (NEURAL AF)

DR. Musikantow, VY. Reddy, I. Skalsky, T. Shaburishvili, M. van Zyl, B. O'Brien, K. Coffey, J. Reilly, P. Neuzil, S. Asirvatham, JR. de Groot

. 2025 ; 68 (2) : 467-474. [pub] 20230810

Language English

Document type Clinical Study, Journal Article

Grant support
879499 Horizon 2020

BACKGROUND: Modulation of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a promising adjuvant therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In pre-clinical models, pulsed field (PF) energy has the advantage of selectively ablating the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) that govern the ANS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of epicardial ablation of the GPs with PF during cardiac surgery with a primary efficacy outcome of prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP). METHODS: In a single-arm, prospective analysis, patients with or without a history of AF underwent epicardial GP ablation with PF during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). AERP was determined immediately pre- and post- GP ablation to assess cardiac ANS function. Holter monitors were performed to determine rhythm status and heart rate variability (HRV) at baseline and at 1-month post-procedure. RESULTS: Of 24 patients, 23 (96%) received the full ablation protocol. No device-related adverse effects were noted. GP ablation resulted in a 20.7 ± 19.9% extension in AERP (P < 0.001). Post-operative AF was observed in 7 (29%) patients. Holter monitoring demonstrated an increase in mean heart rate (74.0 ± 8.7 vs. 80.6 ± 12.3, P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in HRV. There were no study-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of epicardial ablation of the GP using PF to modulate the ANS during cardiac surgery. Large, randomized analyses are necessary to determine whether epicardial PF ablation can offer a meaningful impact on the cardiac ANS and reduce AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration: NCT04775264.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25016381
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731092853.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10840-023-01615-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37561246
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a x
100    1_
$a Musikantow, Daniel R $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1030, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
245    10
$a Targeted ablation of epicardial ganglionated plexi during cardiac surgery with pulsed field electroporation (NEURAL AF) / $c DR. Musikantow, VY. Reddy, I. Skalsky, T. Shaburishvili, M. van Zyl, B. O'Brien, K. Coffey, J. Reilly, P. Neuzil, S. Asirvatham, JR. de Groot
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Modulation of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a promising adjuvant therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In pre-clinical models, pulsed field (PF) energy has the advantage of selectively ablating the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) that govern the ANS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of epicardial ablation of the GPs with PF during cardiac surgery with a primary efficacy outcome of prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP). METHODS: In a single-arm, prospective analysis, patients with or without a history of AF underwent epicardial GP ablation with PF during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). AERP was determined immediately pre- and post- GP ablation to assess cardiac ANS function. Holter monitors were performed to determine rhythm status and heart rate variability (HRV) at baseline and at 1-month post-procedure. RESULTS: Of 24 patients, 23 (96%) received the full ablation protocol. No device-related adverse effects were noted. GP ablation resulted in a 20.7 ± 19.9% extension in AERP (P < 0.001). Post-operative AF was observed in 7 (29%) patients. Holter monitoring demonstrated an increase in mean heart rate (74.0 ± 8.7 vs. 80.6 ± 12.3, P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in HRV. There were no study-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of epicardial ablation of the GP using PF to modulate the ANS during cardiac surgery. Large, randomized analyses are necessary to determine whether epicardial PF ablation can offer a meaningful impact on the cardiac ANS and reduce AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration: NCT04775264.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    12
$a koronární bypass $x metody $7 D001026
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie ambulantní $7 D015716
650    12
$a elektroporace $x metody $7 D018274
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    12
$a ganglia autonomní $x chirurgie $7 D005725
650    12
$a perikard $x chirurgie $x inervace $7 D010496
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinická studie $7 D000068397
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1030, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA. vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
700    1_
$a Skalsky, Ivo $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Shaburishvili, Tamaz $u Tbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
700    1_
$a van Zyl, Martin $u Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, BC, Canada
700    1_
$a O'Brien, Barry $u AtriAN Medical, Galway, Ireland
700    1_
$a Coffey, Ken $u AtriAN Medical, Galway, Ireland
700    1_
$a Reilly, John $u AtriAN Medical, Galway, Ireland
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Asirvatham, Samuel $u Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
700    1_
$a de Groot, Joris R $u University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00008134 $t Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology $x 1572-8595 $g Roč. 68, č. 2 (2025), s. 467-474
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37561246 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731092847 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366913 $s 1253506
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 68 $c 2 $d 467-474 $e 20230810 $i 1572-8595 $m Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology $n J Interv Card Electrophysiol $x MED00008134
GRA    __
$a 879499 $p Horizon 2020
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...